Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A special Partial Least Squares (PLS) path decision modeling for bid evaluation of large construction projects

  • Construction Management
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Large construction projects involve massive capital investments, lengthy execution period, and enormous management uncertainties. Therefore, the task of selecting a capable contractor for smooth project delivery is challenging. Although previous studies have attempted to improve the methods of bidding evaluation, limitations still exist. First, the evaluation results might be biased due to the heterogeneity in a small group of experts with different professional experience and capabilities. Second, multi-correlation can reduce the validity of the weightings of the indexes and evaluation results. Third, the subjectivity of the weightings can be a crucial hurdle to the selection of a suitable contractor for a specific project. To overcome these shortcomings, this study introduces Partial Least Squares (PLS) path modeling and develops a Sequence-Multi-Criteria System which can aggregate the evaluation results from different professional practitioners without the use of pre-defined weighting schemes, thus providing a reliable reference for bid evaluation. We incorporated this approach into an evaluation procedure stipulated in the procurement documents of the World Bank and specifically aimed at selecting suitable contractors for large construction projects. A case study was conducted via comparisons across various scenarios, and the validity of this approach was subsequently proved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aibinu, A. A. and Al-Lawati, A. M. (2010). “Using PLS-SEM technique to model construction organizations’ willingness to participate in e-bidding.” Automation in Construction, Vol. 19, No. 6, pp. 714–724. DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2010.02.016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Reshaid, K. and Kartam, N. (2005). “Design–build pre-qualification and tendering approach for public projects.” International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 309–320, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.11.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arslan, G., Kivrak, S., Birgonul, M. T., and Dikmen, I. (2008). “Improving sub-contractor selection process in construction projects: Web-based suB-contractor Evaluation System (WEBSES).” Automation in Construction, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 480–488, DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2007.08.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beil, D. R. and Wein, L. M. (2003). “An inverse-optimization-based auction mechanism to support a multiattribute RFQ process.” Management Science, Vol. 49, No. 11, pp. 1529–1545, DOI: org/ 10.1287/mnsc.49.11.1529.20588.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Burge, P., Devlin, N., Appleby, J., Rohr, C., and Grant, J. (2005). London patient choice project evaluation: A model of patients’ choices of hospital from stated and revealed preference choice data, Rand Corporation/The King’s Fund and City University, London. DOI: http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, A. P. and Chan, A. P. (2004). “Key performance indicators for measuring construction success.” Benchmarking: an International Journal, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 203–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, E. W. and Li, H. (2004). “Contractor selection using the analytic network process.” Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 22, No. 10, pp. 1021–1032, DOI: 10.1080/0144619042000202852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David, E., Azoulay-Schwartz, R., and Kraus, S. (2006). “Bidding in sealed-bid and English multi-attribute auctions.” Decision Support Systems, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 527–556, DOI: 1016/j.dss.2005.02.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirtas, E. A. and Ustun, O. (2008). “An integrated multiobjective decision making process for supplier selection and order allocation.” Omega, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 76–90, DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2005.11.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fong, P. S. W. and Choi, S. K. Y. (2000). “Final contractor selection using the analytical hierarchy process.” Construction Management & Economics, Vol. 18, No. 5, pp. 547–557, DOI: 10.1080/014461900407356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallien, J. and Wein, L. M. (2005). “A smart market for industrial procurement with capacity constraints.” Management Science, Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 76–91, DOI: org/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0230.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Guinot, C., Latreille, J., and Tenenhaus, M. (2001). “PLS path modelling and multiple table analysis. Application to the cosmetic habits of women in Ile-de-France.” Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, Vol. 58, No. 2, pp. 247–259, DOI: 10.1016/S0169-7439(01)00163-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatush, Z. and Skitmore, M. (1998). “Contractor selection using multicriteria utility theory: An additive model.” Building and Environment, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 105–115, DOI: 10.1016/S0360-1323(97)00016-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, G. D. (1998). “Which contractor selection methodology?” International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 153–164, DOI: 10.1016/S0263-7863(97)00035-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huo, T. F., Liu, B. S., Chen, Y., and Wang, X. Q. (2015). “Research into the Dynamic Evolution Mechanism of the Forming of Chinese Construction Industry Competitiveness in the New Century—On the development strategy after entering GPA.” Operations Research and Management Science[J], Vol. 24, No. 5, pp. 251–258, DOI: 10.12005/orms.2015.0184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isik, Z., Arditi, D., Dikmen, I., and Birgonul, M. T. (2009). “Impact of corporate strengths/weaknesses on project management competencies.” International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 27, No. 6, pp. 629–637, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.10.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakobowicz, E. and Derquenne, C. (2007). “A modified PLS path modeling algorithm handling reflective categorical variables and a new model building strategy.” Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Vol. 51, No. 8, pp. 3666–3678, DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2006.12.004.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jaselskis, E. J. and Russell, J. S. (1992). “Risk analysis approach to selection of contractor evaluation method.” Journal of construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 118, No. 4, pp. 814–821, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1992)118:4(814).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, P. and Holt, G. D. (1998). “Prequalification and multicriteria selection: A measure of contractors’ opinions.” Construction Management & Economics, Vol. 16, No. 6, pp. 651–660, DOI: 10.1080/014461998371944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kashiwagi, D. and Byfield, R. E. (2002). “Selecting the best contractor to get performance: On time, on budget, meeting quality expectations.” Journal of Facilities Management, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 103–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, K. K., Liu, S. L., and Wang, S. Y. (2004). “A method used for evaluating bids in the Chinese construction industry.” International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 193–201, DOI: 10.1016/S0263-7863(03)00009-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, K. C., Ng, S. T., Tiesong, H., Skitmore, M., and Cheung, S. O. (2000). “Decision support system for contractor pre-qualification-artificial neural network model.” Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 251–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, B. S., Huo, T. F., Liang, Y., Sun, Y., and Hu, X. (2015b). Key Factors of Project Features Affecting Project Delivery System Decision-Making—A Case Study with Chinese Data Based on Rough Set Theory, ASCE Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice [J] (accepted in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, B. S., Huo, T. F., Liao, P. C., Gong, J., and Xue, B. (2014b). A Group Decision-Making Aggregation Model for Contractor Selection in Large Scale Construction Projects Based on Two-Stage Partial Least Squares (PLS) Path Modeling, Group Decision and Negotiation, pp. 1–29, DOI: 10.1007/s10726-014-9418-2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, B. S., Huo, T. F., Meng, J. N., Gong, J., Shen, Q. P., and Sun, T. (2015a). “Identification of key contractor characteristic factors that affect project success under different project delivery systems.” Journal of Management of Engineering, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, B. S., Huo, T. F., Shen, Q. P., Yang, Z. Y., Meng, J. N., and Xue, B. (2014a). “Which owner’s characteristics are key factors affecting project delivery system decision-making?—Empirical analysis based on rough set theory.” Journal of Management of Engineering, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE) ME.1943-5479.0000298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, B. S., Huo, T. F., Wang, X. Q, Shen, Q. P., and Chen, Y. (2013). “The decision model of the intuitionistic fuzzy group bid evaluation for urban infrastructure projects considering social costs.” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 263–273, DOI: 10.1139/cjce-2012-0283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, B. S., Wang, X. Q., and Li, B. (2011). “Analysis of chinese construction industry competitiveness formation mechanism—empirical research of pls-based structural equation model.” Journal of Applied Statistics and Management, Vol. 11, pp. 12–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, S. T. and Skitmore, R. M. (2001). “Contractor selection criteria: a cost-benefit analysis.” Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 96–106, DOI: 10.1109/17.913169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padhi, S. S. and Mohapatra, P. K. (2010). “Centralized bid evaluation for awarding of construction projects–A case of India government.” International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 275–284, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.06.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palaneeswaran, E. and Kumaraswamy, M. (2001). “Recent advances and proposed improvements in contractor prequalification methodologies.” Building and Environment, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 73–87, DOI: 10.1016/S0360-1323(99)00069-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patil, B. S. (2006). Civil engineering contracts and estimates, University press, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shyur, H. J. and Shih, H. S. (2006). “A hybrid MCDM model for strategic vendor selection.” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, Vol. 44, No. 7, pp. 749–761, DOI: 10.1016/j.mcm.2005.04.018.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, A., Hawking, P., and Wyld, D. C. (2003). “The 20% solution?: A case study on the efficacy of reverse auctions.” Management Research News, Vol. 26, No. 5, pp. 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tenenhaus, A. and Tenenhaus, M. (2011). “Regularized generalized canonical correlation analysis.” Psychometrika, Vol. 76, No. 2, pp. 257–284, DOI: 10.1007/s11336-011-9206-8.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., Chatelin, Y. M., and Lauro, C. (2005). “PLS path modeling.” Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 159–205, DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2004.03.005.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Topcu, Y. I. (2004). “A decision model proposal for construction contractor selection in Turkey.” Building and Environment, Vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 469–481, DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2003.09.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tran, V. H. Q. (2002). Practical frontier in construction pre-qualification using data envelopment analysis, Master thesis, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H. W. and Fu, L. H. (2004). “The application research of partial least square path modeling on establishing synthesis evaluation Index.” Systems Engineering-theory & Practice, Vol. 10, No. 10, pp. 80–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Xu, Y., and Li, Z. (2009). “Research on project selection system of pre-evaluation of engineering design project bidding.” International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 27, No. 6, pp. 584–599, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.10.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X. and Triantaphyllou, E. (2008). “Ranking irregularities when evaluating alternatives by using some ELECTRE methods.” Omega, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 45–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z. F. and Zhang, Y. (2010). The Project Bid Evaluation Model Based on Entropy Method, Science and Technology Management Research, pp. 47–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt, D. J., Kayis, B., and Willey, K. (2010). “The relative importance of tender evaluation and contractor selection criteria.” International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 51–60, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.04.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wold, H. (1985). “Partial least squares, Kotz S Johnson N L, Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences.” New York: John Wiley & Sons, Vol. 6, pp. 581–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, C. H., Holt, G. D., and Harris, P. (2001). “Multi-criteria selection or lowest price? Investigation of UK construction clients’ tender evaluation preferences.” Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 257–271, DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-232x.2001.00205.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1992). Guidelines, Procurement under IBRD Loans and IDA Credits.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, H. and Proverbs, D. (2003). “Factors influencing contractor performance: An international investigation.” Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 10, No. 5, pp. 322–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management and Economics, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China

    Bingsheng Liu

  2. Faculty of Construction Management and Real Estate, Chongqing University, Chongqing, 400044, PR China

    Tengfei Huo

  3. Dept. of Building and Real Estate, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong

    Tengfei Huo

  4. Dept. of Construction Management, School of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China

    Pin-chao Liao

  5. School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, China

    Jingfeng Yuan

  6. Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing Jiangsu, China

    Jiong Sun

  7. Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, USA

    Xuan Hu

Authors
  1. Bingsheng Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tengfei Huo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Pin-chao Liao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jingfeng Yuan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jiong Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xuan Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pin-chao Liao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, B., Huo, T., Liao, Pc. et al. A special Partial Least Squares (PLS) path decision modeling for bid evaluation of large construction projects. KSCE J Civ Eng 21, 579–592 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-0702-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-0702-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation