Skip to main content
Log in

Deformation monitoring using different least squares adjustment methods: A simulated study

  • Surveying and Geo-Spatial Information Engineering
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the ability of different least squares adjustment techniques for detecting deformation. A simulated geodetic netwo rk is used for this purpose. The observations are collected using the Total Station instrument in three epochs and different least squares adjustment methods are used to analyze the simulated network. The applied methods are adjustment-byelement, using variance-covariance components and Tikhonov regularization. For numerical computation, we utilized exist geodetic network around the simulated network and the deformation (changes in the simulated network) imposes to the object using a simulator in each epoch. The obtained results demonstrate that more accurate outcome for detection of small deformation is possible by estimating variance-covariance components. The difference of the estimated and the simulated deformations in the best scenario, i.e., applying variance-covariance components, is 0.2 and 0.1 mm in x and y directions. In comparison with adjustment by element and Tikhonov regularization methods the differences are 1.1 and 0.1 in x direction and 1.4 and 1.1 mm in y direction, respectively. In addition, it is also possible to model the deformation and therefore it can be seen that how the calculated displacement will affect the result of deformation modelling. It has been demonstrated that determining reasonable variance-covariance components is very important to estimate realistic deformation model and monitoring the geodetic networks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beshr, A. A. El.-W. and Kaloop, M. R. (2013). “Monitoring bridge deformation using auto-correlation adjustment technique for total station observations.” Positioning, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 1–7, DOI: 10.4236/pos.2013.41001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjerhammar, A. (1973). Theory of errors and generalized matrix inverses, Elsevier.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bouman, J. (1998). Quality of regularization methods, DEOS Report no. 98.2, Delft University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. Q. (1983). Analysis of deformation surveys — A generalized method, Technical Report No. 94, Department of Surveying Engineering, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, N.B.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chrzanowski, A., Chen, Y. Q., and Secord, J. M. (1983). “On thestrain analysis of tectonic movements using faultcrossing geodetic surveys.” Tectonophysics, Vol. 97, Issues 1–4, pp. 297–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosser, E., Roberts, G. W., Xiaolin Meng, and Dodson, A. H. (2003). “Measuring the dynamic deformation of bridges using a total stations.” Proceedings, 11th FIG Symposium on Deformation Measurements, Santorini, Greece.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ditmar, P., Kusche, J., and Klees, R. (2003). “Computation of spherical harmonics coefficients from gravity gradiometry data to be acquired by the GOCE satellite: regularization issues.” J Geod., Vol. 77, Issues 7–8, pp. 465–477.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, H. (2006). Theory of errors and least squares adjustment, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafarend, E., Kleusberg, A., and Schaffrin, B. (1980). “An introduction to the variance and covariance component estimation of helmert type.” ZfV, Vol. 105, No. 4, 1980, pp. 161–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, P. C. (1998). Rank-Deficient and discrete ill-posed problems, SIAM monographs on mathematical modeling and computation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, P. C. (2008). Regularization Tools version 4.0 for Matlab 7.3, Numerical Algorithms, Vol. 46, pp. 189–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HMK-Ge:S. (1996). Handbok i mät-och kartfrågor, Geodesi Stommätning. Gävle: Lantmäteriet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. D. and Sippel, K. D. (2002). Modern deformation monitoring: a multi sensor approach, FIG XXII International Congress, Washington DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junhuan, P., Shi Yun, Li Shuhui, and Yang Honglei (2011). “Minque of Variance-Covariance Components in Linear Gauss-Markov Models.” Journal of Surveying Engineering, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000050.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaloop, M. R. and Li, H. (2009). “Monitoring of bridge deformation using GPS technique.” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 13, Issue 6, pp. 423–431, DOI: 10.1007/s12205-009-0423-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuang, S. L. (1991). Optimization and design of deformation monitoring schemes, Technical Report No. 157. PhD Thesis, Department of Surveying Eng. University of New Brunswick, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuang, S. L. (1996). Geodetic network analysis and optimum design: concepts and applications, Ann Arbor Press, Inc., Chelsea, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng, X. (2002). Real-time deformation monitoring of bridges using GPS/accelerometers, PhD Thesis, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radovanovic, R. S. and Teskey, W. F. (2001). “Dynamic monitoring of deforming structures: GPS verses robotic tacheometry systems.” The 10th FIG International Symposium on Deformation Measurements, Orange, California, USA, pp. 61–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, C. R. and Mitra, S. K. (1971). Generalized inverse of matrices and its applications, New York: Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, C. R. (1973). Linear statistical inference and its applications, 2nd edition, John Wiley & Sons.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Raziq, N. and Collier, P. (2007). GPS deflection monitoring of the west gate bridge, 3rd IAG / 12th FIG Symposium, Baden, May 22-24, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Setan, H. and Singh, R. (2001). Deformation analysis of a geodetic monitoring network. Geomatica, Vol. 55, No. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg, L. E. (1983). Unbaised estimation of variance-covariance components in condition adjustment, Department of Geodesy, Uppsala University, Report No. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolnikoff, I. S. (1956). Mathematical theory of elasticity, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tikhonov, A. N. (1963). Solution of incorrectly formulated problems and regularization method, Soviet Math. Dokl., 4: 1035–1038, English translation of Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR 151, pp. 501–504.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Bagherbandi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bagherbandi, M. Deformation monitoring using different least squares adjustment methods: A simulated study. KSCE J Civ Eng 20, 855–862 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-015-0454-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-015-0454-5

Keywords

Navigation