Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Paradigm shift in main contractor-subcontractor partnerships with an e-procurement framework

  • Construction Management
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Subcontractors play an important role in the successful completion of construction projects. Recent changes within the business environment have shifted subcontracting toward a more advanced principal of partnership: between a main contractor and their subcontractors. While many studies have revealed a variety of factors that enhance partnerships, practical research about building a long-term systematic partnership between such main contractors and subcontractors is almost nonexistent. This research presents a paradigm shift in main contractor-subcontractor partnerships. It identifies 7 partnering elements - subcontracting strategy, performance improvement, process innovation, information sharing, cooperation in collaboration, standardization of selection, and feedback of evaluation - from literature reviews, and presents feedback and analysis from surveys and interviews. The results confirmed that both main contractors and subcontractors recognized that these elements were important to partnering, but that they were lacking in current execution. It also suggests the developing of a framework for an e-procurement system that applies a strategic-partnership philosophy to help improve the subcontracting processes of strategy, bidding, evaluation, and management. The results of this study may be applicable as a reference to aid development in creating realistic guidelines for the purpose of enhancing the overall effectiveness of the construction industry by improving main contractor-subcontractor partnerships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AGC (1991). Partnering: A concept for success, Associated General Contractors of America, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arditi, D. and Chotibhongs, R. (2005). “Issues in subcontracting practice.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, Vol. 131, No. 8, pp. 866–876, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131: 8(866).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, J., Cohen, M., Jashapara, A., and Simpson, Y. (1997), Partnering: Revealing the realities in the construction industry, Policy Press, Bristol, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxendale, T. and Greaves, D. (1997). “A link between contractor and subcontractor.” Proc. of CIB W92 Symposium, 20–23 May, 1997, Montréal, Canada, pp. 21–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. and Jayes, S. (1998). The seven pillars of partnering: A guide to second generation partnering, Homas Telford Ltd., London, UK.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Black, C., Akintoye, A., and Fitzgerald, E. (2000). “An analysis of success factors and benefits of partnering in construction.” International Journal of Project Management, Elsevier, Vol. 18, No. 6, pp. 423–434, DOI: 10.1016/S0263-7863(99)00046-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bresnen, M. and Marshall, N. (2000). “Partnering in construction: a critical review of issues, problems and dilemmas.” Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 229–237, DOI: 10.1080/014461900370852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick, T. and Rajagopal, S. (1995). Strategic supply management: an implementation toolkit, Oxford, Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd., UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, E. W. and Li, H. (2001). “Development of a conceptual model of construction partnering.” Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Emerald, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 292–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, E. W., Li, H., and Love, P. E. D. (2000). “Establishment of critical success factors for construction partnering.” Journal Management in Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 84–92, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2000)16:2(84).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, M. (1992). Logistics and supply chain management: Strategies for reducing costs and improving service, Pitman Publishing, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Construction Industry Institute (1991). “In search of partnering excellence.” Publication No. 17-1, Austin, TX, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, E. L. and Hancher, D. E. (1990). “Partnering: Contracting for the future.” Journal of Management in Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 431–446, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)9742-597X(1990)6:4(431).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, C. J., Blackburn, J. D., and van Wassenhove, L. N. (1999). Partnerships to improve supply chains, Sloan Management Review, summer, pp. 71–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dainty, A. R. J., Briscoe, G. H., and Millett, S. J. (2001). “Subcontractor perspectives on supply chain alliances.” Construction Management and Economics, Routledge, Vol. 19, No. 8, pp. 841–848, DOI: 10.1080/01446190110089727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliman, T. and Orange, G. (2003). “Developing distributed design capabilities in the construction supply chain.” Construction Innovation, Emerald, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 15–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ENR (2006). The top 225 global contractors, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eom, S. J. and Paek, J. H. (2006). “The subcontractor evaluation system model based on balanced scorecard with new partnership theory,” Journal Architectural Institute of Korea, AIK, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 139–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinze, J. and Tracey, A. (1994). “The main contractor-subcontractor relationship: The subcontractors view.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, Vol. 120, No. 2, pp. 254–287, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1994)120:2(274).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M. H. (2004). A Study on the construction subcontractor management system for improvement of cost competitiveness, Construction and Economy Research Institute of Korea, Seoul, Korea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumaraswamy, M. M. and Matthews, J. D. (2000). “Improved subcontractor selection employing partnering principles.” Journal of Management in Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 47–57, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2000)16:3(47).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latham, M. (1994). Constructing the team, Department of the Environment, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotte Engineering and Construction (2006). e-procurement and win-win cooperation plan, Internal Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, S. (1997). “Subcontractor partnering: I’ll believe it when I see it.” Journal of Management in Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 13, No. 5, pp. 29–31, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(1997)13:5(29).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, J. (1996). A project partnering approach to the main contractor-subcontractor relationship, PhD Thesis, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naim, M. M. and Towill, D. R. (1994). “Establishing a framework for effective materials logistics management.” International Journal of Logistics Management, Emerald, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 81–88, DOI: 10.1108/09574099410805108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neely, A. and Bourne, M. (2000). “Why measurement initiatives fail,” Measuring Business Excellence, Emerald, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 3–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nitithamyong, P. and Skibniewski, M. J. (2004). “Web-based construction project management systems: how to make them successful?.” Automation in Construction, Elsevier, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 491–506, DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2004.02.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nobbs, H. (1993). Future role of construction specialists, The Business Round Table, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rankin, J. H., Chen, Y. J., and Christian, A. J. (2006). “e-procurement in the atlantic Canadian AEC industry.” Journal of Information in Construction, ICRIBC, Vol. 11, pp. 75–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reading Construction Forum (1995). Trusting the team: The best practice guide to partnering in construction, Center for Strategic Studies in Construction, Reading, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, S. R. and Moore, M. M. (1992). “Perceptions of partnering in the public sector.” Project Management Journal, Wiley InterScience, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 13–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, G. P. (2003). Electronic commerce, Thomson Learning. Boston, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimizu, J. Y. and Cardoso, F. F. (2002). “Subcontracting and cooperation network in building construction: a literature review.” Proc. The 10 th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC-10), August, 2002, Gramado, Brazil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas Ng, S. T., and Luu, C. D. T. (2008). “Modeling subcontractor registration decisions through case-based reasoning approach.” Automation in Construction, Elsevier, Vol. 17, No. 7, pp. 873–881, DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2008.02.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas Ng, S. T., Chen, S. E., McGeorge, D., and Lam, K. C. (2001). “Current state of IT usage by Australian subcontractors.” Construction Innovation, Emerald, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, A. H. and Matthews, J. (1996). “An evaluation of definitions and the key elements of partnering.” Proc. of the RICS Foundation COBRA Conference, September, 1996, Bristol, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veeramani, R., Russel, J. S., Chan, C., Cusick, N., Mahle, M. M., and Roo, B. V. (2002). State-of-practice of ecommerce application in the construction industry, CII Research Report, CII, Austin, TX, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verheij, H. and Augenbroe, G. (2006). Collaborative planning of AEC projects and partnerships, Automation in Construction, Elsevier, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 428–437, DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2005.06.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrijhoef, R. (1998). Co-makership in construction: towards construction supply chain management, Thesis of Graduate Studies, Delft Univ. of Tech., Delft, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, K. (1999). “Is partnering starting to mean all things to all people.” Contract Journal, Vol. 397, No. 6212, pp. 14–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welling, D. T. and Kamann, D. J. F. (2001). “Vertical cooperation in the construction industry: Size does matter.” The Journal of Supply Chain Management, Wiley InterScience, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 28–33, 10.1111/j.1745-493X.2001.tb00110.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, G. D. and Ellis, R. C. T. (2005). “Main contractor experiences of partnering relationships on UK construction projects.” Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 317–325, DOI: 10.1080/0144619042000287714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou, P. X. W. and Seo, Y. S. (2006). “Effective application of ecommerce technologies in construction supply chain: Current practice and future improvement.” Journal of Information in Construction, ICRIBC, Vol. 11, pp. 127–147.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Kyungil University, Gyeongsan, 712-701, Korea

    Shin-Jo Eom

  2. Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Hanbat National University, Daejeon, 305-719, Korea

    Sang-Chul Kim

  3. Dept. of Civil Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, 712-749, Korea

    Won-Suk Jang

Authors
  1. Shin-Jo Eom
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sang-Chul Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Won-Suk Jang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sang-Chul Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eom, SJ., Kim, SC. & Jang, WS. Paradigm shift in main contractor-subcontractor partnerships with an e-procurement framework. KSCE J Civ Eng 19, 1951–1961 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-015-0179-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-015-0179-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation