Skip to main content
Log in

National level assessment of Biodiversity importance — Focusing on South Korea

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biodiversity management has become an international issue as global environmental problems become more controversial. At the 10th International Conference of Biodiversity, an international consensus was formed around the “Aichi targets”. New international targets have been set as follows: loss of natural habitat including forest is to be reduced by half, or to zero percent, and conservation in inland areas and coastal areas is to be expanded up to 17% and 10%, respectively, by the year 2020. Likewise, each country must prepare a national strategy for the management of biodiversity and perform in accordance with international targets while securing national sovereignty over biodiversity, as it is an important indicator of a nation’s competitiveness. The consensus evaluated the importance of biodiversity with the goal of selecting the regions that are the most significant for maintaining biodiversity in a national territory. This study evaluated the potential regions for expanding the amount of biodiversity under preservation management, including areas that serve as biodiversity footholds and those that already have a high level of biodiversity. In addition, by analyzing the factors that threaten biodiversity, it made decision making possible by determining whether urgent management of severely threatened areas is necessary. The results of our analysis showed that the highest scores were primarily for the Bakdudaegan Mountain ranges and Mt. Seorak National Park in the Bakdudaegan region, where the wetlands of Mt. Daeam Yong Swamp and natural parks are located. The biodiversity of the whole region surrounding the Yongsan River basins and around the Sumjin River estuaries was also evaluated to be high. Yanggu, Hwacheon, and the DMZ in Inje were the local governments with the highest biodiversity importance. This study can provide assistance in identifying the regions that are significant for maintaining biodiversity and can be used as a fundamental guide for intense biodiversity management or for the nation's investment decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banai, R. (1993). “Fuzziness in geographical information systems: Contributions from the analytic hierarchy process.” INT. J. Geographical Information Systems Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 315–329, DOI: 10.1080/02693799308901964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BDM (Biodiversity Monitoring in Switzerland) (2009). The state of biodiversity in Switzerland: Overview of the findings of biodiversity monitoring Switzerland (BDM) as of May 2009, Federal Office for The Environment (FOEN).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, G. A. (1995). Urban forest landscapes, University of Washington Press, Seattle, 224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Büchs, W. (2003). “Biodiversity and agri-environmental indicators- general scopes and skills with special reference to the habitat level.” Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, Vol. 98, No. 2, pp. 35–78, DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8809-03-00070-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cha, S. Y. and Park, J. H. (1999). “Development of green network plan using bird habitat evaluation model- A case study of seoul.” Journal of the Korean Institute of Fresh Water Architecture, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, J. C., Shin, H. C., Park, S. K., Cho, D. S., and Kwon, O. S. (2010). Biodiversity is Our Life, Kungree, Seoul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dramstad, W. E., Olson, J. D., and Forman, R. T. T. (1996). Landscape ecology principles in landscape architecture and land-use planning, Island Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dröschmeister, R. and Sukopp, U. (2009). “Indicators and conservation policy: The German sustainability indicator for species diversity as an example.” Avocetta, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 149–156, DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2007.09.005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duke, G. and Aycrigg, M. (2000). Biodiversity and environmental assessment toolkit, Environmental Resources Management, The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egoh, B., Fouget, M., Reyers, B., Kinight, A. T., Cowlings, R. M., van Jaarsveld, A. S., and Welz, A. (2007). “Integrating ecosystem services into conservation assessments.” Ecological Economics, Vol. 63, No, 4, pp. 714–721, DOI: 10.1016j.ecolecon.2007.04.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FME (Federal Ministry for the Environment), NCNS (Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety) (2010). Fourth national report under the convention on biological diversity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gontier, M., Balfors, B., and Mortberg, U. (2006). “Biodiversity in environmental assessment- current practice and tools for prediction.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 268–286, DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2005.09.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graymore, M. L. M., Wallis, A. M., and Richards, A. J. (2009). “An index of regional sustainability: A GIS-based multiple criteria analysis decision support system for progressing sustainability.” Ecological Complexity, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 453–462, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.08.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, K. W. and Park, S. Y. (2003). “Fresh water scale ecosystem evaluation for sustainable land use planning.” Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 78–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • JME (Japan Ministry of Environment) (2010). National parks of JAPAN important biodiversity areas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, D. J., Kang, K. H., Huh, J., Kim, C. J., Kim, S. H., and Lee, J. B. (2010). “Mapping for biodiversity using national forest inventory data and GIS.” Journal of Korean Society of Environmental Impact Assessment, Vol. 19, No. 6, pp. 573–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H. A. (2007). A study on setting of wetland management area through wetland ecosystem assessment, MSc Thesis, Seoul National University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H. W. and Choi, M. H. (2010). “River management through riverside buffer zones-Utility of ecological hydrological models and remote sensing.” Journal of Korea River Association, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 92–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K. K. (2003). Wetland and environment, Seoul Academy Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, W. J. (2004). Classification of ecological areas in Korea based on spatial variables related to natural environment, PhD Thesis, Seoul National University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, W. J. and Hwang, S. R. (2006). Assessment of nature destruction in unit development projects and application plan, Seoul Development Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, D. D. and Walsh, D. M. (1994). “Plant species richness- the effect of island size and habitat diversity.” J. of Ecology, Vol. 82, pp. 367–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, Y. H., Roh, T. H., Lee, H. W., and Jung, H. R. (2006). Introduction of biodiversity in assessing environments, Korea Environment Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakes, T. and Kim, H. O. (2012). “The urban environmental indicator “biotope area ratio”—An enhanced approach to assess and manage the urban ecosystem services using high resolution remote-sensing.” Ecological Indicators, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 93–103, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.05.016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D. K., Yoon, S. W., Kim, E. Y., Cheon, S. W., and Choi, J. Y. (2005). “Application of fresh water ecology indicators for conservation value assessment.” Journal of the Korean Institute of Fresh water Architecture, Vol. 32, No. 6, pp. 14–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, G. G. (2006). “Ecological resource assessment for spatial decision support on private land policy inside national parks Korea.” Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology, Vol. 9, No. 5, pp. 41–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, G. G. (2009). “A model to support spatial decision making for selection of ecotourism sites in urban and regional area.” Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 50–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, G. G. (2010). A study on introduction of biotope area rate indicators and invigoration of the system, Ministry of Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, G. G., Sung, H. C., and Choi, J. Y. (2007). “Conservation area designation method for natural environmental management in a rural local government.” Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology, Vol. 10, No. 5, pp. 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, G. G. and Yang, B. Y. (2001). “A determinant model for methods to calculate the weighted value of each indicator for environmental evaluation.” Journal of Korean Society of Environmental Impact Assessment, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 59–71.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. C. (2002). “A study on developmental strategies of policy for biodiversity conservation.” Regional Development Research, Vol. 10, pp. 317–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • ME (Korea Ministry of Environment) (2007). A study on building wide ecosystem.

    Google Scholar 

  • ME (Korea Ministry of Environment) (2010). Policy-setting on sustainable ecological use of land.

    Google Scholar 

  • ME (Korea Ministry of Environment) (2011). A guideline on making urban ecological status maps (biotope maps).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortberg, U. M., Balfors, B., and Knol, W. C. (2007). “Landscape ecological assessment a tool for integrating biodiversity issues in strategic environmental assessment and planning.” Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 82, No. 4, pp. 457–470, DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.01.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, J. W. (2008). “Legal issues on biodiversity conservation and ecosystem restoration.” Journal of Environmental Law Association, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 73–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, S. J. and Choi, S. J. (2008). A study on approaches to marine genetic resources and benefit-sharing by the government — Based on the convention on biological diversity, Korea Maritime Institute research report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, Y. H., Lee, H. W., Kim, K. K., Lee, G. G., Choi, J. Y., Huh, S. J., and Seo, K. W. (2008). “Development of designation criteria for ecological protected areas and its application methodology.” Journal of Korean Society of Environmental Impact Assessment, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 177–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, Y. H., Lee, H. W., Kim, K. K., Lee, G. G., Seo, K. W., Kyung, J. H., Park, J. H., and Huh, S. J. (2007). A Study on objectification in designating eco-reserves, Ministry of Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, Y. K. (1994). “Strategy for bio-diversity and genetic conservation of forest resources in Korea.” Journal of Korean Forest Society, Vol. 83, No. 2, pp. 191–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricklefs, R. E. and Lovette, I. J. (1999). “The roles of island area perse and habitat diversity in the species-area relationship of four Lesser Antillean faunal groups.” Journal of Animal Ecology, Vol. 68, pp. 1142–1160, DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2656.1999.00358.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowntree, R. A. (1986). “Ecology of the urban forest-part II: Function.” Urban Ecology, Vol. 9, pp. 227–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, H. T. (2000). A study on assessment criteria of ecosystem preservation areas based on priority in preservation, PhD Thesis, Yeungnam University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, J. H. (2010). “A study on the natural park plan through ecological conservation value evaluation-A case study on Mt. Hwangmaesan county park.” Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology, Vol. 13, No. 5, pp. 28–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, J. H., Kwon, J. O., Oh, J. H., Cheon, J. H., Lim, J. H., Yang, H. M., and Kim, Y. G. (2009). Forest scenery and ecosystem management regions in Korea, Korea Forest Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP CBD (1992). Convention on biological diversity.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP WCMC (World Conservation Monitoring Centre) (2010). The Arctic Biodiversity Assessment (ABA) international expert workshop on the 2010 biodiversity indicators and post-2010 indicator development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Water Resources Corporation (2010). Water resource unit map.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, J. H., Cheon, S. K., Choi, W. Y., and Lee, W. S. (2006). “Rank decision of ecological environment assessment field introducing fuzzy integral.” Journal of the Korean Institute of Fresh Water Architecture, Vol. 34, No. 5, pp. 39–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, K. J. (2005). A study on designation of sanctuaries in the baekdu mountain range and review of validity of setting the scope of management, Korea Forest Conservation Association Research Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, K. R., Park, M. Y., and Kim, K. K. (2009). “A study on management of forests in urban areas by assessing their preservation values — Based on a case study of surisan in Gunpo-si.” Regional Development Research, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 69–85.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gwan-Gyu Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, JH., Lee, MJ. & Lee, GG. National level assessment of Biodiversity importance — Focusing on South Korea. KSCE J Civ Eng 19, 46–62 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-013-0678-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-013-0678-1

Keywords

Navigation