Skip to main content
Log in

Usefulness of model-based iterative reconstruction in semi-automatic volumetry for ground-glass nodules at ultra-low-dose CT: a phantom study

  • Published:
Radiological Physics and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the effects of parameter presets of the forward projected model-based iterative reconstruction solution (FIRST) on the accuracy of pulmonary nodule volume measurement. A torso phantom with simulated nodules [diameter: 5, 8, 10, and 12 mm; computed tomography (CT) density: − 630 HU] was scanned with a multi-detector CT at tube currents of 10 mA (ultra-low-dose: UL-dose) and 270 mA (standard-dose: Std-dose). Images were reconstructed with filtered back projection [FBP; standard (Std-FBP), ultra-low-dose (UL-FBP)], FIRST Lung (UL-Lung), and FIRST Body (UL-Body), and analyzed with a semi-automatic software. The error in the volume measurement was determined. The errors with UL-Lung and UL-Body were smaller than that with UL-FBP. The smallest error was 5.8% ± 0.3 for the 12-mm nodule with UL-Body (middle lung). Our results indicated that FIRST Body would be superior to FIRST Lung in terms of accuracy of nodule measurement with UL-dose CT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yankelevitz DF, Reeves AP, Kostis WJ, Zhao B, Henschke CI. Small pulmonary nodules: volumetrically determined growth rates based on CT evaluation. Radiology. 2000;217:251–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kanashiki M, Tomizawa T, Yamaguchi I, Kurishima K, Hizawa N, Ishikawa H, Kagohashi K, Satoh H. Volume doubling time of lung cancers detected in a chest radiograph mass screening program: comparison with CT screening. Oncol Lett. 2012;4:513–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Team TNLSTR. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2004;365:395–409.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Geyer LL, Schoepf UJ, Meinel FG, Nance JW, Bastarrika G, Leipsic JA, Paul SP, Rengo M, Laghi A, De Cecco CN. State of the art: iterative CT reconstruction techniques. Radiology. 2015;276:339–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ohno Y, Yaguchi A, Okazaki T, Aoyagi K, Yamagata H, Sugihara N, Koyama H, Yoshikawa T, Sugimura K. Comparative evaluation of newly developed model-based and commercially available hybrid-type iterative reconstruction methods and filter back projection method in terms of accuracy of computer-aided volumetry (CADv) for low-dose CT protocols in phantom study. Eur J Radiol. 2016;85:1375–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tatsugami F, Higaki T, Sakane H, Fukumoto W, Kaichi Y, Iida M, Baba Y, Kiguchi M, Tsushima S, Awai K. Coronary artery stent evaluation with model-based iterative reconstruction at coronary CT Angiography. Acad Radiol. 2017;24:975–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. International Commission on Radiological Publication 102. Managing patient dose in multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT). Ann ICRP. 2007;37:73–9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Doo KW, Kang EY, Yong HS, Woo OH, Lee KY, Oh YW. Accuracy of lung nodule volumetry in low-dose CT with iterative reconstruction: an anthropomorphic thoracic phantom study. Br J Radiol. 2014;87:20130644.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software “EZR” for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013;48:452–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen B, Barnhart H, Richard S, Robins M, Colsher J, Samei E. Volumetric quantification of lung nodules in CT with iterative reconstruction (ASiR and MBIR). Med Phys. 2013;40:111902.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sakai N, Yabuuchi H, Kondo M, Kojima T, Nagatomo K, Kawanami S, Kamitani T, Yonezawa M, Nagao M, Honda H. Volumetric measurement of artificial pure ground-glass nodules at low-dose CT: comparisons between hybrid iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84:2654–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim H, Park CM, Song YS, Lee SM, Goo JM. Influence of radiation dose and iterative reconstruction algorithms for measurement accuracy and reproducibility of pulmonary nodule volumetry: a phantom study. Eur J Radiol. 2014;83:848–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Willemink MJ, Leiner T, Budde RPJ, De Kort FPL, Vliegenthart R, Van Ooijen PMA, et al. Systematic error in lung nodule volumetry: effect of iterative reconstruction versus filtered back projection at different CT parameters. Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199:1241–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nomura Y, Higaki T, Fujita M, Miki S, Awaya Y, Nakanishi T, Yoshikawa T, Hayashi N, Awai K. Effects of iterative reconstruction algorithms on computer-assisted detection (CAD) software for lung nodules in ultra-low-dose CT for lung cancer screening. Acad Radiol. 2017;24:124–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Christe A, Torrente JC, Lin M, Yen A, Hallett R, Roychoudhury K, Schmitzberger F, Vock P, Roos J. CT screening and follow-up of lung nodules: effects of tube current-time setting and nodule size and density on detectability and of tube current-time setting on apparent size. Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:623–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fujita M, Higaki T, Awaya Y, Nakanishi T, Nakamura Y, Tatsugami F, Baba Y, Iida M, Awai K. Lung cancer screening with ultra-low dose CT using full iterative reconstruction. Jpn J Radiol. 2017;35:179–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hwang EJ, Goo JM, Kim J, Park SJ, Ahn S, Park CM, Shin YG. Development and validation of a prediction model for measurement variability of lung nodule volumetry in patients with pulmonary metastases. Eur Radiol. 2017;27:3257–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sui X, Meinel FG, Song W, Xu X, Wang Z, Wang Y, Jin Z, Chen J, Vliegenthart R, Schoepf UJ. Detection and size measurements of pulmonary nodules in ultra-low-dose CT with iterative reconstruction compared to low dose CT. Eur J Radiol. 2016;85:564–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hoop B de, Gietema H, van Ginneken B, Zanen P, Groenewegen G, Prokop M. A comparison of six software packages for evaluation of solid lung nodules using semi-automated volumetry: what is the minimum increase in size to detect growth in repeated CT examinations. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:800–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Prof. Kunio Doi for improvement in the English expressions and also in support for guiding the research of young investigators, which is based on the Individual Research Guidance Program established by the Japanese Society of Radiological Technology (JSRT). This manuscript was partly supported by Akiyoshi Ohtsuka Fellowship of the Japanese Society of Radiological Technology for improvement in English expression of a draft version of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuki Maruyama.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies performed with human participants or animals.

Informed consent

Informed consent for this study was not required, because no research involving human participants was undertaken by any of the authors.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maruyama, S., Fukushima, Y., Miyamae, Y. et al. Usefulness of model-based iterative reconstruction in semi-automatic volumetry for ground-glass nodules at ultra-low-dose CT: a phantom study. Radiol Phys Technol 11, 235–241 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-018-0442-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-018-0442-9

Keywords

Navigation