Abstract
The paper analyzes the move of discrediting the opponent as a means to persuasion in political debates. After analysis of a corpus of political debates, a typology of discrediting strategies is outlined, distinguished in terms of three criteria: the target—the feature of the opponent specifically attacked (dominance, competence, benevolence); the route through which it is attacked—topic, mode or directly the person; and the type of communicative act that conveys the attack (insult, criticism, correction…). The relevance of body signals in discrediting moves is highlighted.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
EPR (European Pressurized Reactor).
References
Aristotle (1961) Retorica. Laterza, Bari
Walton DN (1992) Types of dialogue, dialectical shifts and fallacies. In: van Eemeren FH, Grootendorst RJ, Blair A, Willard CA (eds) Argumentation illuminated. SICSAT, Amsterdam, pp 133–147
Walton DN (1998) Ad Hominem arguments. Studies in rhetoric and communication. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa
van Eemeren FH, Grootendorst R (1992) Argumentation, communication, and fallacies: a pragma-dialectical perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale
Hovland CI, Weiss W (1951) The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opin Q 15:635–650
Heider F (1944) Social perception and phenomenal causality. Psychol Rev 51:358–374
Weiner B (1986) An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. Springer, New York
Seligman MEP (1975) Helplessness: on depression, development, and death. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco
Peeters G (1971) The positive-negative asymmetry: on cognitive consistency and positivity bias. Eur J Soc Psychol 1(4):455–474
Catellani P (2011) Attacco e difesa nella comunicazione massmediale. In: Catellani P, Sensales G (eds) Psicologia della politica, pp 97–112
Gamson WA, Modigliani A (1987) The changing culture of affirmative action. Res Polit Sociol 3:137–177
Mazzoleni P (2004) La comunicazione politica. Il Mulino, Bologna
Poggi I, D’Errico F, Vincze L (2011) Discrediting moves in political debate. In: Ricci F et al. (eds) Proceedings of second international workshop on user models for motivational systems: the affective and the rational routes to persuasion (UMMS 2011), Girona. LNCS. Springer, Berlin, pp 84–99
Fiske ST, Cuddy AJC, Glick P, Xu J (2002) A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. J Pers Soc Psychol 82:878–902
Ekvall G (1991) The organizational culture of idea-management: a creative climate for the management of ideas. In: Henry J, Walker D (eds) Managing innovation. SAGE, London, pp 73–79
Leach CW, Ellemers N, Barreto M (2007) Group virtue: the importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of ingroups. J Pers Soc Psychol 93:234–249
Catellani P, Bertolotti M (2011) Leadership attacks versus morality attacks: their effects on the evaluation of politicians. In: XVI general meeting of the European association of social psychology, Stockholm 12–16 July, 2011
Conte R, Castelfranchi C (1995) Cognitive and social action. University College, London
Miceli M, Castelfranchi C (1998) The role of evaluation in cognition and social interaction. In: Dautenhahn K (ed) Human cognition and agent technology. Benjamins, Amsterdam
Poggi I (2008) Types of emotions and types of goals. In: Proceedings of the workshop AFFINE: affective interaction in natural environment, post-conference workshop of ICMI 2008, Chania, Crete, 24 September 2008
Austin JL (1962) How to do things with words. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Chomsky N (1965) Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge
Poggi I (2007) Mind, hands, face and body. A goal and belief view of multimodal communication. Weidler Buchverlag, Berlin
Kendon A (2004) Gesture. Visible action as utterance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Poggi I (2011) Irony, humour ad ridicule. Power, image and judicial rhetoric in an Italian political trial. In: Vion R, Giacomi A, Vargas C (eds) La corporalité du language: Multimodalité, discours et écriture, Hommage à Claire Maury-Rouan. Presses Universitaires de Provence, Aix en Provence
Zullow HM, Oettingen G, Peterson C, Seligman MEP (1988) Pessimistic explanatory style in the historical record: CAVing LBJ, presidential candidates, and East versus West Berlin. Am Psychol 43:673–682
Zullow HM, Seligman MEP (1990) Pessimistic rumination predicts defeat of presidential candidates, 1900–1984. Psychol Inquiry 1:52–61
Fogg BJ (2002) Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo
Curhan JR, Pentland A (2007) Thin slices of negotiation: predicting outcomes from conversational dynamics within the first 5 minutes. J Appl Psychol 92:802–808
Acknowledgements
Research supported by SSPNet Seventh Framework Program, European Network of Excellence SSPNet (Social Signal Processing Network), Grant Agreement N. 231287.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
D’Errico, F., Poggi, I. & Vincze, L. Discrediting signals. A model of social evaluation to study discrediting moves in political debates. J Multimodal User Interfaces 6, 163–178 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12193-012-0098-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12193-012-0098-4