Skip to main content
Log in

A case for leveraging integrated regulation strategies to optimize health benefits from self-determined exercise behavior

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Annals of Behavioral Medicine

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Williams DM, Dunsiger S, Miranda R, et al. Recommending self-paced exercise among overweight and obese adults: A randomized pilot study. Ann Behav Med. 2015; 49: 280–285. doi:10.1007/s12160-014-9642-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ekkekakis P, Parfitt G, Petruzzello SJ. The pleasure and displeasure people feel when they exercise at different intensities: Decennial update and progress towards a tripartite rationale for exercise intensity prescription. Sport Med. 2011; 41: 641–671. doi:10.2165/11590680-000000000-00000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Williams DM. Exercise, affect, and adherence: An integrated model and a case for self-paced exercise. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2008; 30: 471–496.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Williams DM, Raynor HA. Disentangling the effects of choice and intensity on affective response to and preference for self-selected-versus imposed-intensity physical activity. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2013; 14: 767–775. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.04.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Garber CE, Blissmer B, Deschenes MR, et al. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: Guidance for prescribing exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011; 43: 1334–1359. doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e318213fefb.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Arem H, Moore SC, Patel A, et al. Leisure time physical activity and mortality: A detailed pooled analysis of thedose-response relationship. JAMA Intern Med. 2015; 175(6): 959–967. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.0533.

  7. Gebel K, Ding D, Chey T, Stamatakis E, Brown WJ, Bauman AE. Effect of moderate to vigorous physical activity on all-cause mortality in middle-aged and older Australians. JAMA Intern Med. 2015; 175(6): 970–977. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.0541.

  8. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000; 55: 68–78. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fletcher L, Hayes SC. Relational frame theory, acceptance and commitment therapy, and a functional analytic definition of mindfulness. J Ration Emot Cogn Behav Ther. 2005; 23: 315–336. doi:10.1007/s10942-005-0017-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Forman EM, Hoffman KL, Juarascio AS, Butryn ML, Herbert JD. Eating behaviors comparison of acceptance-based and standard cognitive-based coping strategies for craving sweets in overweight and obese women. Eat Behav. 2013; 14: 64–68. doi:10.1016/j.eatbeh.2012.10.016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gifford E, Kolhenberg B, Hayes S, et al. Acceptance-based treatment for smoking cessation. Behav Ther. 2004; 35: 689–705. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(04)80015-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Butryn ML, Forman EM, Hoffman K, Shaw J, Juarascio A. A pilot study of acceptance and commitment therapy for promotion of physical activity. J Phys Act Health. 2011; 8: 516–522.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Goodwin CL, Forman EM, Herbert JD, Butryn ML, Ledley GS. A pilot study examining the initial effectiveness of a brief acceptance-based behavior therapy for modifying diet and physical activity among cardiac patients. Behav Modif. 2012; 36: 199–217. doi:10.1177/0145445511427770.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gregg JA, Callaghan GM, Hayes SC, Glenn-Lawson JL. Improving diabetes self-management through acceptance, mindfulness, and values: A randomized controlled trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2007; 75: 336–343. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.75.2.336.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hayes SC. Acceptance and commitment therapy, relational frame theory, and the third wave of behavioral and cognitive therapies. Behav Ther. 2004; 35: 639–665. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(04)80013-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Preparation of this commentary was supported in part by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number F31CA180483. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Funding

Preparation of this commentary was supported in part by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number F31CA180483.

Conflict of Interest

Authors Courtney J. Stevens and Angela D. Bryan declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

Not applicable to this commentary—no data involving human subjects were collected.

Informed Consent

Not applicable to this commentary—no data involving human subjects were collected.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Courtney J. Stevens MA.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stevens, C.J., Bryan, A.D. A case for leveraging integrated regulation strategies to optimize health benefits from self-determined exercise behavior. ann. behav. med. 49, 783–784 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-015-9722-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-015-9722-3

Keywords

Navigation