References
Meyer T, Hussein S, Lange HW, Herman-Lingen C. Type D personality is unrelated to adverse cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease treated by intracoronary stenting. Ann Behav Med. 2014. doi:10.1007/s12160-014-9590-2.
Denollet J, Schiffer AA, Spek V. A general propensity to psychological distress affects cardiovascular outcomes: Evidence from research on the Type D (distressed) personality profile. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010; 3: 546-557.
Smith TW. Toward a more systematic, cumulative, and applicable science of personality and health: Lessons from Type D personality. Psychosom Med. 2011; 73: 528-532.
Coyne JC, de Voogd JN. Are we witnessing the decline effect in the Type D personality literature? What can be learned? J Psychosom Res. 2012; 73: 401-407.
Suls J. Anger and the heart: Perspectives on cardiac risk, mechanisms and interventions. Prog Cardio Dis. 2013; 55: 538-547.
Bogg T, Roberts BW. The case for conscientiousness: Evidence and implications for a personality trait marker of health and longevity. Ann Behav Med. 2013; 44: 1-11.
Martin L, Friedman HS, Schwartz JE. Personality and mortality risk across the life span: The importance of conscientiousness as a biopsychosocial attribute. Health Psychol. 2007; 26: 428-436.
Carney RM, Freedland KE. Depression, mortality and medical morbidity in patients with coronary heart disease. Biol Psychiatry. 2003; 54: 241-247.
Author’s Statement Conflict of Interest
J. Suls declares that he has no conflicts of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Any opinions expressed in this paper are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Cancer Institute.
About this article
Cite this article
Suls, J. An Informative Failure to Replicate—the Type D is Distressed: a Comment on Meyer et al.. ann. behav. med. 48, 140–141 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-014-9628-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-014-9628-5