Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Switchgrass Stand Density and Yield as Influenced by Seedbed Preparation Methods in a Sandy Loam Soil

  • Published:
BioEnergy Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Successful establishment of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) remains a challenge. It is reported that increasing seed-soil contact using a roller could improve switchgrass establishment in silt-loam soils. However, use of rollers is not common among growers and operating them could be difficult. The objective of this study was to assess whether rolling could improve switchgrass stand establishment in sandy-loam soils by increasing seed-soil contact through compacting the soil, and to evaluate the use of cultipacker as a more user-friendly alternative to roller. An experiment was conducted in 2012 and repeated in the 2013 growing season at the University of Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station farm in Deerfield. The soil type at the experimental site was Hadley fine sandy loam (nonacid, mesic Typic Udifluvent). The experimental design was a randomized complete block design with four replicates. There were eight treatments including disking-planting (D-P), disking-cultipacking-planting (D-C-P), disking-cultipacking-planting-cultipacking (D-C-P-C), disking-cultipacking-planting-cultipacking-cultipacking (D-C-P-C-C), disking-rolling-planting (D-R-P), disking-rolling-planting-rolling (D-R-P-R), disking-rolling-planting-rolling-rolling (D-R-P-R-R), and disking-rolling-planting-rolling-rolling-rolling (D-R-P-R-R-R). Tiller density was influenced rolling and cultipacking frequency but not by the compaction equipment. Tiller density increased by cultipacking or rolling the soil once (D-C-P-C; D-R-P-R) and two times after planting (D-C-P-C-C; D-R-P-R-R). Disking-planting had the lowest tiller density with 188 and 110 plants (m−2) in 2012 and 2013 growing seasons, respectively. Similar to tiller density, biomass yield was not influenced by compaction equipment but by compaction frequency. Higher biomass yield was obtained from soils that were firmed once before and at least once after planting (D-C-P-C; D-R-P-R) compared with seedbed firming only once before planting (D-C-P; D-R-P). In a dry season (2012), a twofold yield increase (1.06 Mg ha−1) was obtained from D-C-P-C compared with D-C-P (0.55 Mg ha−1). However, two times rolling (D-R-P-R-R-) or cultipacking (D-C-P-C-C) after planting was needed in 2013 to increase the yield compared with D-C-P by 41 %. Our results indicated that using cultipacker as an alternative to roller can be a solution to improve switchgrass establishment. We conclude that D-C-P-C-C could ensure switchgrass establishment and improve switchgrass biomass production in the establishment year in a sandy-loam soil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sadeghpour A, Gorlitsky LE, Hashemi M, Weis SA, Herbert SJ (2014) Response of switchgrass yield and quality to harvest season and nitrogen fertilizer. Agron J 106:290–296. doi:10.2134/agronj2013.0183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gorlitsky LE, Sadeghpour A, Hashemi M, Etemadi F, Herbert SJ (2015) Biomass vs. quality tradeoffs for switchgrass in response to fall harvesting period. Ind Crop Prod 63:311–315. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.10.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sanderson MA, Adler PR, Boateng AA, Casler MD, Sarath G (2006) Switchgrass as a biofuels feedstock in the USA. Can J Plant Sci 86:1315–1325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sadeghpour A, Hashemi M, Herbert SJ (2014) A simple vigor test for adjusting switchgrass seeding rate in marginal and fertile soils. Grassl Sci 60:252–255. doi:10.1111/grs.12066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Herbert SJ, Gorlitsky L, Hashemi M, Sadeghpour A (2012) Proceedings from Sun Grant National Conference: Science for Biomass Feedstock Production and Utilization, New Orleans, LA. Sun Grant. www.sungrant.tennessee.edu/NatConference. Accessed 27 Nov. 2013

  6. Sadeghpour A, Hashemi M, DaCosta M, Jahanzad E, Herbert SJ (2014) Switchgrass establishment influenced by cover crop, tillage systems and weed control. Bioenerg Res 7:1402–1410. doi:10.1007/s12155-014-9485-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mitchell R, Schmer M (2012) Switchgrass harvest and storage. Switchgrass. In: Monti A (ed) A valuable biomass crop for energy. Springer-Verlag, London, pp 113–127

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sadeghpour A, Hashemi M, DaCosta M, Jahanzad E, Herbert SJ (2014) Assessing winter cereals as cover crops for weed control in reduced-tillage switchgrass establishment. Ind Crop Prod 62:522–525. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.09.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sadeghpour A, Hashemi M, DaCosta M, Jahanzad E, Herbert SJ (2014) Switchgrass establishment and biomass yield response to seeding date and herbicide application. Agron J 107:142–148. doi:10.2134/agronj2014.0288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Berti MT, Johnson BL (2013) Switchgrass establishment as affected by seeding depth and soil type. Ind Crop Prod 41:289–293. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.04.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Perrin R, Vogel K, Schmer M, Mitchell R (2008) Farm-scale production cost of switchgrass for biomass. Bioenerg Res 1:91–97. doi:10.1007/s12155-008-9005-y

  12. Foster JL, Guretzky JA, Huo C, Kering MK, Butler TJ (2013) Effects of row spacing, seeding rate, and planting date on establishment of switchgrass. Crop Sci 53:309–314. doi:10.2135/cropsci2012.03.0171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hashemi M, Sadeghpour A (2013) Establishment and production of switchgrass grown for combustion: a review. Int J Plant Biol Res 1(1):1002. http://www.jscimedcentral.com/PlantBiology/Articles/ plantbiology-1-1002.pdf. Accessed 27 Nov. 2013.

  14. Monti A, Venturi P, Elbersen HW (2001) Evaluation of the establishment of lowland and upland switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) varieties under different tillage and seedbed conditions in northern Italy. Soil Tillage Res 63:75–83. doi:10.1016/S0167-1987(01)00238-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Venturi P, Monti A, Elbersen HW (1999) Soil tillage and switchgrass (P. virgatum L.) establishment. In: Proceedings of the conference on energy and agriculture towards the third millennium, Athens, June 2–5, pp 76–84

  16. Hakansson I, Myrbeck A, Etana A (2002) A review of research on seedbed preparation for small grains in Sweden. Soil Tillage Res 64:23–40. doi:10.1016/S0167-1987(01)00255-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Crabtree WL, Henderson CWL (1999) Furrows, press wheels and wetting agents improve crop emergence and yield on water repellent soils. Plant Soil 214:1–8. doi:10.1023/A:1004314427626

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. AOSA (2010) Handbook of the Association of Official Seed Analysts (AOSA). AOSA Rules for Testing Seeds. AOSA Inc., Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hashemi M, Farsad A, Sadeghpour A, Weis SA, Herbert SJ (2013) Cover crop seeding date influence on fall nitrogen recovery. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 176:69–75. doi:10.1002/jpln.201200062

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sadeghpour A, Jahanzad E, Esmaeili A, Hosseini MB, Hashemi M (2013) Forage yield, quality and economic benefit of intercropped barley and annual medic in semi-arid conditions: additive series. Field Crop Res 148:43–48. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2013.03.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. SAS Institute (2009) SAS 9.1.2 qualification tools user’s guide. SAS Institute Inc, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  22. Moles AT, Warton DI, Warman L et al (2009) Global patterns in plant height. Ecol 97:923–932. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01526.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lemus R, Brummer EC, Moore KJ, Molstad NE, Burras CL, Barker MF (2002) Biomass yield and quality of 20 switchgrass populations in southern Iowa, USA. Biomass Bioenerg 23:433–442. doi:10.1016/S0961-9534(02)00073-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sanderson MA, Schmer M, Owens V, Keyser P, Elbersen W (2012) Crop management of switchgrass. Switchgrass in: Monti A (ed) A valuable biomass crop for energy. Springer-Verlag, London, pp 87–112

  25. Curran WS, Ryan MR, Myers MW, Adler PA (2012) Effect of seeding date and weed control on switchgrass establishment. Weed Technol 26:248–255. doi:10.1614/WT-D-11-00078.1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Miesel JR, Renz MJ, Doll JE, Jackson RD (2012) Effectiveness of weed management method in establishment of switchgrass and a native species mixture for biofuels in Wisconsin. Biomass Bioenerg 36:121–131. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.10.018

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Mitchell RB, Vogel KP (2012) Germination and emergence tests for predicting switchgrass field establishment. Agron J 104:458–465. doi:10.2134/agronj2011.0168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sokhansanj S, Mani S, Turhollow A et al (2009) Large-scale production, harvest and logistics of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.)–current technology and envisioning a mature technology. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 3:124–141. doi:10.1002/bbb.129

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amir Sadeghpour.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sadeghpour, A., Hashemi, M., Jahanzad, E. et al. Switchgrass Stand Density and Yield as Influenced by Seedbed Preparation Methods in a Sandy Loam Soil. Bioenerg. Res. 8, 1840–1846 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-015-9638-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-015-9638-6

Keywords

Navigation