Neuroethics

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 243–245

On the Stand. Another Episode of Neuroscience and Law Discussion From Italy

Brief Communication

DOI: 10.1007/s12152-013-9187-7

Cite this article as:
Farisco, M. & Petrini, C. Neuroethics (2014) 7: 243. doi:10.1007/s12152-013-9187-7

Abstract

After three proceedings in which neuroscience was a relevant factor for the final verdict in Italian courts, for the first time a recent case puts in question the legal relevance of neuroscientific evidence. This decision deserves international attention in its underlining that the uncertainty still affecting neuroscientific knowledge can have a significant impact on the law. It urges the consideration of such uncertainty and the development of a shared management of it.

Keywords

Neuroscience Law Neurolaw 

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biogem Genetic Research CentreVia Camporeale—Area PIPAriano IrpinoItaly
  2. 2.Italian National Institute of HealthRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations