Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Identifying geospatial inconsistency of web services metadata using spatial ranking

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Earth Science Informatics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Geospatial metadata is one of the key elements of the geographic resource catalogues on the Web. Catalogues such as GeoNetwork use the direct and indirect spatial references from metadata to process spatial queries. The visibility of resources in a collection often depends on the consistency of the descriptions that help to find resources. Spatially inconsistent metadata records can hide resources and make them irretrievable. This paper presents a semi-automatic approach based on the combination of spatial ranking, reverse geocoding, geographic knowledge organization systems, and information retrieval techniques able to detect geospatial inconsistencies in metadata collections. Experimental results with a dataset of Geospatial Web Service metadata records show that this approach provides a significant advantage in terms of inconsistency detection, and rich insight into the metadata. People responsible of geospatial catalogues, such as librarians and Spatial Data Infrastructure managers, could take advantage of the approach presented in this work to assess the visibility of their assets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amitay E, Har’El N, Sivan R, Soffer A (2004) Web–a–where: geotagging web content. In: SIGIR’04: Proceedings of the 27th Annual International ACM SIGIR. New York, pp 273–280. doi:10.1145/1008992.1009040

  • Atallah M (1983) A linear time algorithm for the Hausdorff distance between convex polygons. Inf Process Lett 17(4):207–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beard K, Sharma V (1997) Multidimensional ranking for data in digital spatial libraries. International Journal of Digital Libruries 1:153–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bédard Y, Merrett T, Han J (2001) Fundamentals of spatial data warehousing for geographic knowledge discovery. Geogr Data Min Knowl Discov 2:53–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonan L, Fonseca F (2006) TDD: a comprehensive model for qualitative spatial similarity assessment. Spat Cogn Comput 6(1):31–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn A, Hazarika S (2001) Qualitative spatial representation and reasoning: an overview. Fundam Inf 43(2–32)

  • Egenhofer M (2002) Toward the semantic geospatial web. In Proc. 10th ACM International Symposium on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, ACM, pp 1–4. doi:10.1145/585147.585148

  • Egenhofer M, Franzosa R (1995) On the equivalence of topological relations. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 9(2):133–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federal Geographic Data Committee (2013) Content standard for digital geospatial metadata. Available online at: http://www.fgdc.gov/metadata/csdgm/, 1998. Ver. 2. Accessed June 8 2013

  • Frontiera P, Larson R, Radke J (2008) A comparison of geometric approaches to assessing spatial similarity for GIR. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 22(3):337–360. doi:10.1080/13658810701626293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelernter J (2009) Image indexing in article component databases. J Am Soc Inform Scie Technol 60(10):1965–1976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goyal R, Egenhofer M (2001) Similarity of cardinal directions. In: Jensen C, Schneider M, Seeger B, Tsotras V (Eds) Seventh International Symposium on Spatial and Temporal Databases.

  • Grütter R, Bauer-Messmer B (2007) Towards spatial reasoning in the semantic web: a hybrid knowledge representation system architecture. In The European Information Society. Springer, Berlin, pp 349–364

  • Gui Z, Yang C, Xia J, Liu K, Xu C, Li J, Lostritto P (2013) A performance, semantic and service quality-enhanced distributed search engine for improving geospatial resource discovery. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 27(6):1109–1132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann J, Stuckenschmidt H (2002) Automatic metadata analysis for environmental information systems. In Proceedings of Environmental Informatics 2002. Metropolis Verlag, Marburg

  • Hill L (1990) Access to geographic concepts in online bibliographic fdes: effectiveness of current practices and the potential of a graphic interface. PhD thesis, University of Pittsburgh

  • Hill L (2006) Georeferencing: the geographic associations of information (Digital Libraries & Electronic Publishing). MIT Press

  • Huttenlocher D, Gregory A (1993) Klanderman, and William J. Rucklidge. “Comparing images using the Hausdorff distance”. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 15(9):850–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • INSPIRE-Homepage, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2013:331:0001:0267:EN:PDF. Accessed Dec 27 2013

  • Janée G (2003) Spatial similarity functions. Available online at: http://www.alexandria.ucsb.edu/~gjanee/archive/2003/similarity.html. Accessed Oct 23 2013

  • Janowicz K, Schade S, Bröring A, Kessler C, Maue P, Stasch C (2010) Semantic enablement for spatial data infrastructures. Trans GIS (14):111–129

  • Janowicz K, Raubal M, Kuhn W (2011) The semantics of similarity in geographic information retrieval. J Spat Inf Sci 2:29–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones CB, Alani H, Tudhope D (2001) Geographical information retrieval with ontologies of place. In Spatial information theory. Springer, Berlin, pp 322–335

  • Jones CB, Purves R, Ruas A, Sanderson M, Sester M, Van Kreveld M, Weibel R (2002) Spatial information retrieval and geographical ontologies an overview of the SPIRIT project. In Proceedings of the 25th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. ACM, pp 387–388.

  • Kresse W, Danko D (Eds) (2011) Springer handbook of geographic information. Springer.

  • Landauer TK, McNamara DS, Dennis S, Kintsch W (2007) Handbook of latent semantic analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum Ass, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson R (2011) Ranking approaches for GIR. SIGSPATIAL 3(2):37–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leidner JL (2004) Towards a reference corpus for automatic toponym resolution evaluation. In Workshop on Geographic Information Retrieval, Sheffield, UK

  • Leveling J (2011) Challenges for indexing in GIR. SIGSPATIAL 3(2):29–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longhorn RA (2005) Geospatial standards, interoperability, metadata semantics and spatial data infrastructure. In Proceedings NIEeS Workshop on Activating Metadata, Cambridge, pp 1–23

  • Lopez-Pellicer FJ, Renteria-Agualimpia W, Béjar R, Muro-Medrano PR Zarazaga-Soria FJ (2012a) Availability of the OGC geoprocessing standard: March 2011 reality check. Comput Geosci 47:13–19. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2011.10.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Pellicer FJ, Lacasta J, Florczyk A, Nogueras-Iso J, Zarazaga-Soria FJ (2012b) An ontology for the representation of spatio-temporal jurisdictional domains in information retrieval systems. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 26(4):579–597. doi:10.1080/13658816.2011.599811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lutz M (2006) Ontology-based discovery and composition of geographic information services. Ph. D. Thesis, Institut für Geoinformatik, Germany

  • Martins B, Calado P (2010) Learning to rank for geographic information retrieval. In Proc. of the 6th Workshop on GIR. ACM, p 21

  • Martins B, Silva MJ, Freitas S, Afonso AP (2006) Handling locations in search engine queries. GIR 6:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Martins B, Borbinha J, Pedrosa G, Jo G, Freire N (2007) Geographically-aware information retrieval for collections of digitized historical maps. In: GIR’07: Proceedings of the 4th ACM workshop on GIR, pp 39–42

  • Nogueras-Iso J, Zarazaga-Soria FJ, Muro-Medrano PR (2005) Geographic information metadata for spatial data infrastructures. Springer, Berlin, ISBN: 3-540-24464-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Piasecki M, Bermudez L, Beran B, Islam S, Choi YR, Liang X, Jeong S (2010) Hydrologic Metadata, Hydrologic Information System Status Report, 88

  • Renteria-Agualimpia W, Lopez-Pellicer FJ, Lacasta J, Muro-Medrano PR, Zarazaga-Soria FJ (2013a) Una aproximación geosemántica para detectar inconsistencia en los metadatos de servicios web geoespaciales. GeoFocus. Available online at: http://geofocus.rediris.es/2013/Articulo7_2013_1.pdf

  • Renteria-Agualimpia W, Lopez-Pellicer FJ, Lacasta J, Zarazaga-Soria FJ, Muro-Medrano PR (2013b) Identifying hidden geospatial resources in catalogues. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics. ACM, p 32

  • Renz J (2002) Qualitative spatial representation and reasoning. In Qualitative spatial reasoning with topological information. Springer, Berlin

  • Salton G, McGill MJ (1983) Introduction to modern information retrieval. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stvilia B, Gasser L, Twidale MB, Shreeves S, Cole T (2004) Metadata quality for federated collections. In: Chengulur-Smith S, Raschid L, Long J, Seko C (eds) Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Quality–ICIQ. MITIQ, Cambridge, pp 111–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker D, Newman I, Medyckyj-Scot D, Ruggles C (1992) A system for identifying datasets for GIS users. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 6:511–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Wei F (2009) A schema-matching-based approach to propagating updates between heterogeneous spatial databases. Geoinformatics 2008 and Joint Conference on GIS and Built environment: Advanced Spatial Data Models and Analyses. International Society for Optics and Photonics

  • Wang L, Wang C, Xie X, Forman J, Lu Y, Ma W, Li Y (2005) Detecting dominant locations from search queries. In Proceedings of SIGIR-05, the 28th Conf. on Research and development in information retrieval

  • Yu HQ, Reiff-Marganiec S (2008) A method for automated web service selection. In Services-Part I, 2008. Congress on IEEE, pp 513–520

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been partially supported by the Spanish Government (project TIN2012-37826-C02-01), the Government of Aragon (project INNOVA-A1-038-13), the National Geographic Institute (IGN) of Spain and GeoSpatiumLab S.L. The work of Walter Renteria-Agualimpia has been partially supported by a grant (ref. B181/11) from the Aragon Government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Aragon, Spain

    Walter Renteria-Agualimpia, Francisco Javier Lopez-Pellicer, Javier Lacasta, Pedro Rafael Muro-Medrano & F. Javier Zarazaga-Soria

Authors
  1. Walter Renteria-Agualimpia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Francisco Javier Lopez-Pellicer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Javier Lacasta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Pedro Rafael Muro-Medrano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. F. Javier Zarazaga-Soria
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Walter Renteria-Agualimpia.

Additional information

Communicated by: H. A. Babaie

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Renteria-Agualimpia, W., Lopez-Pellicer, F.J., Lacasta, J. et al. Identifying geospatial inconsistency of web services metadata using spatial ranking. Earth Sci Inform 8, 427–437 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-014-0172-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-014-0172-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation