Abstract
In this study, we utilize both quantitative and qualitative data to examine the effect of dependent applicant status on the occupational mobility of married, professional immigrant men and women arriving in Canada through the skilled worker immigration category. Using longitudinal quantitative data, we find that dependent applicants, regardless of gender, experience a greater drop in occupational status after migration than principal applicants and they are unable to overcome this disadvantage over time. Qualitative interview data highlights the subtle, implicit relationship between dependent applicant status, traditional gender roles, and employment integration. In most cases, the women are designated as the dependent applicant during the immigration process because they have lower levels of the human capital that is valued for Canadian immigration than their husbands. Our findings suggest that within newly immigrated families, principal applicants are better able to reestablish their careers, while dependent applicants, disproportionately women, face more employment disadvantage, regardless of their professional background.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
NOC codes classify occupations according to their skill level and skill type. Skill levels range from A to D, with level A representing occupations that require university education; level B those that normally require college education or apprenticeship; level C those that require secondary school; and level D representing those occupations in which on-the-job training is required. The job’s skill type is based on the type of work performed as well as the field or industry of the occupation. Examples of skill types within the NOC include management occupations; occupations in business, finance, and administration; occupations in natural and applied sciences and health occupations. Using this system of classification, the NOC outlines 520 different occupational titles. For more information on NOC codes, please see “National Occupational Classification Training Tutorial” provided by Human Resources and Social Development Canada (HRSDC) at http://www5.hrsdc.gc.ca/NOC/English/NOC/2006/Tutorial.aspx.
If there was more than one job at the time of interview, the main job was the one identified by the respondent.
Regions are represented by dummy variables: (1) Northwest Europe, (2) Latin America/Caribbean, (3) Eastern Europe, (4) Southern Europe, (5) Africa, (6) Middle East/West Asia, (7) South Asia, (8) East Asia, and (9) Southeast Asia. Omitted reference category is Anglo countries (including US, UK, Australia, and New Zealand).
Self-reported English/French language speaking ability ranging from (0) none to (5) fluent.
No postmigration education = 0; participation in postmigration education = 1.
Location of settlement is represented by dummy variables: (1) Toronto, (2) Montreal, and (3) Vancouver. Omitted reference category lives in a location other than Toronto, Montreal, and Vancouver.
No children in the household under age 14 = 0; children under the age of 14 = 1.
In Canadian dollars.
Before conducting the full growth curve model with all explanatory and control variables entered into the model, we constructed an “unconditional growth model”. An unconditional growth model includes wave as the only level 1 predictor and no substantive predictors at level 2 and helps to evaluate the baseline amount of occupational mobility in the population, as well as the between-person heterogeneity in this mobility. It is important to establish that there is enough change in the outcome variable over time and that between-person heterogeneity actually exists before undertaking growth curve analysis. From the unconditional growth model, we found that there is indeed significant change in the outcome variable over time as well as significant heterogeneity in occupational mobility between individuals. Results of this analysis are available from the authors by request.
CIC News Release Announcement, August 17, 2012 http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/department/media/releases/2012/2012-08-17.asp
References
Adsera, A., & Chiswick, B. (2007). Are there gender and country of origin differences in immigrant labor market outcomes across European destinations? Journal of Population Economics, 20(3), 495–526.
Antecol, H., Cobb-Clark, D. A., & Trejo, S. J. (2003). Immigration policy and the skills of immigrants to Australia, Canada, and the United States. Journal of Human Resources, 38(1), 192–218.
Arat-Koc, S. (1999). “Gender and race in ‘non-discriminatory’ immigration policies in Canada: 1960s to the present.”. In E. Dua & A. Robertson (Eds.), Scratching the Surface: Canadian Anti-Racist Feminist Thought (pp. 207–233). Toronto: Women's Press.
Baker, M., & Benjamin, D. (1997). The role of the family in immigrants’ labor-market activity: an evaluation of alternative explanations. American Economic Review, 87(4), 705–727.
Beach, C. M., & Worswick, C. (1993). Is there a double-negative effect on the earnings of immigrant women? Canadian Public Policy, 19(1), 36–53.
Bielby, W. T., & Bielby, D. D. (1992). I will follow him: family ties, gender-role beliefs, and reluctance to relocate for a better job. American Journal of Sociology, 97(5), 1241–1267.
Black, J. S., & Gregersen, H. B. (1991). The other half of the picture: antecedents of spouse cross-cultural adjustment. Journal of International Business Studies, 22(3), 461–477.
Black, J. S., & Stephens, G. K. (1989). The influence of the spouse on American expatriate adjustment and intent to stay in Pacific Rim overseas assignments. Journal of Management, 15(4), 529–544.
Boucher, A. (2007). Skill, migration and gender in Australia and Canada: the case of gender-based analysis. Australian Journal of Political Science, 42(3), 383–401.
Boyd, M. (1989). Family and personal networks in international migration: recent developments and new agendas. International Migration Review, 23(3), 638–670.
Boyd, M. (2008). “A socioeconomic scale for Canada: Measuring occupational status from the Census,” Canadian Review of Sociology, Vol. 45, No. 1.
Boyle, P., Cooke, T., Halfacree, K., & Smith, D. (2001). A crossnational comparison of the impact of family migration on women’s employment. Demography, 38(2), 201–213.
Chiswick, B. R., Lee, Y. L., & Miller, P. W. (2005). A longitudinal analysis of immigrant occupation mobility: a test of the immigrant assimilation hypothesis. International Migration Review, 39(2), 332–353.
Chui, T. (2011). “Immigrant Women.” Women in Canada: a gender based statistical report, (Catalogue No. 89-503-X). Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
Cobb-Clark, D., & Crossley, T. F. (2004). Revisiting the family investment hypothesis. Labour Economics, 11(3), 373–393.
Cobb-Clark, D., & Khoo, S. E. (2006). Public policy and immigrant settlement: how much does immigrant selection matter? In D. Cobb-Clark & S. E. Khoo (Eds.), Public policy and immigrant settlement (pp. 205–211). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, Chapter 8.
Cobb-Clark, D., Connolly, M., & Worswick, C. (2005). Post-migration investments in education and job search: a family perspective. Journal of Population Economics, 18(4), 663–690.
Cole, N. D. (2011a). Managing global talent: solving the spousal adjustment problem. International Journal of Human Resources Management, 22(7), 1504–1530.
Cole, N. D. (2011b). Expatriate accompanying partners: the males speak. Tallinn: Paper presented at the European Academy of Management Annual Conference.
Cooke, F. L. (2001). Trailing wife or trailing mother? Family migration, life course events, and the labor market participation of married women. Environment & Planning A, 33, 419–430.
Cooke, F. L. (2007). “Husband’s career first’: renegotiating career and family commitment among migrant Chinese academic couples in Britain”. Work Employment & Society, 21(1), 47–65.
Cooke, T. J., & Speirs, K. (2005). Migration and employment among the civilian spouses of military personnel. Social Science Quarterly, 86(2), 343–355.
Duleep, H.O. and D.J. Dowhan. (2002) “Revisiting the family investment model with longitudinal data:the earnings growth of immigrant and U.S.-born women,” Institute for the Study of Labor, Discussion Paper No. 568, available from: http://ftp.iza.org/dp568.pdf.
Duleep, H. O., & Sanders, S. (1993). The decision to work by married immigrant women. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 46(4), 677–690.
Goyder, J., & Frank, K. (2007). A scale of occupational prestige in Canada, based on the NOC major groups. The Canadian Journal of Sociology, 32(1), 63–83.
Gunderson M, and Krashinsky H (2004). Rates of return to apprenticeship and post secondary education in Ontario, report to Ontario Ministry of Training, Colleges and Universities.
Harvey, M. G. (1995). The Impact of Dual Career Families on International Relocations. Human Resources Management Review, 5(3), 223–244.
Harvey, M.G. and D. Wiese (1998). “The dual career couple: female expatriates and male trailing spouses,” Thunderbird International Business Review, Vol. 40, No. 4.
Ho, C. (2006). Migration as feminisation? Chinese women’s experiences of work and family in Australia. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 32(3), 497–514.
Iredale, R. (2005), “Balancing the Benefits and costs of skilled migration in the Asia-Pacific region,” in World Migration Report, available from: http://www.iom.int/jahia/webdav/shared/shared/mainsite/published_docs/wmr-2005/11-Balancing-Benefits-Costs-Skilled-Migration-in-Asia-Pacific.pdf.
Kofman, E., & Raghuram, P. (2006). Gender and global labour migrations: incorporating skilled workers. Antipode, 38(2), 282–303.
Le, A. T., & Miller, P. W. (2010). The effect of children on specialization and coordination of partners’ activities. Economics Letters, 108(2), 237–241.
Li, F., & Findlay, A. (1999). “To follow the chicken or not? The role of women in the migration of Hong Kong professional couples,”. In P. Boyle & K. Halfacree (Eds.), Migration and gender in the developed world (pp. 172–185). London: Routledge.
Liversage, A. (2009). “Vital conjectures, shifting horizons: high-skilled female immigrants looking for work”. Work Employment & Society, 23(1), 120–141.
MacPherson, D. A., & Stewart, J. B. (1989). The labor force participation and earnings profiles of married female immigrants. Quarterly Review of Economics and Business, 29(3), 57–72.
Mincer, J. (1978). Family migration decisions. Journal of Political Economy, 86, 749–773.
Nam, C. B., & Boyd, M. (2004). Occupational status in 2000: over a century of census-based measurement. Population Research and Policy Review, 23, 327–358.
Nam, C. B., & Powers, M. G. (1968). Changes in the relative status of workers in the United States, 1950-1960. Social Forces, 47, 158–170.
Pineo, P., & Porter, J. (1967). Occupational Prestige in Canada. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 4(1), 24–40.
Purkayastha, B. (2005). Skilled migration and cumulative disadvantage: the case of highly qualified Asian Indian immigrant women in the U.S. Geoforum, 36(2), 181–196.
Raghuram, P. (2004). Migration, gender and the IT sector: intersecting debates. Women’s Studies International Forum, 27(2), 163–176.
Salaff, J. W., & Greve, A. (2004). Can Chinese women’s social networks migrate? Women's Studies International Forum, 27, 149–162.
Sandell, S. (1977). Women and the economics of family migration. Review of Economics and Statistics, 59(4), 406–414.
Shihadeh, E. S. (1991). The prevalence of husband-centered migration: employment consequences for married mothers. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 432–444.
Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: modeling change and event occurrence. New York: Oxford University Press.
Suto, M. (2009). Compromised careers: the occupational transition of immigration and resettlement. Work, 32, 417–429.
Worswick, C. (1999). Credit constraints and the labor supply of immigrant families in Canada. Canadian Journal of Economics, 32(1), 152–170.
Yeoh, B., & Khoo, L. (1998). Home, work, and community: Skilled international migration and expatriate women in Singapore. International Migration, 36(2), 159–186.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Lisa Deacon and Hila Taraky for excellent research assistance. This research was supported by a grant from CERIS—The Ontario Metropolis Centre.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
R. Banerjee and M. Phan contributed equally to this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Banerjee, R., Phan, M.B. Do Tied Movers Get Tied Down? The Occupational Displacement of Dependent Applicant Immigrants in Canada. Int. Migration & Integration 16, 333–353 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-014-0341-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-014-0341-9