Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

“Let My Fingers Do the Talking”: Sexting and Infidelity in Cyberspace

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Sexuality & Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This exploratory project investigated the behaviors of sexting and infidelity on the internet. The researchers placed a survey on a web site designed for married people to find sexual partners outside their marriage. Using a sample of 5,187 respondents, the study explored how people use the internet to find partners. Using both descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression analysis, the researchers found that the respondents use the internet to find real-life partners, both for dating and for sex hookups, but many are anxious about being caught. Females are more likely than males to engage in sexting behaviors, while females and males are equally as likely to cheat both online and in real life while in a serious real-life relationship. Older males, however, are more likely than younger males to cheat in real life. The results suggest that perhaps people who are using dating web sites do not conform to the “official” standards of dating culture, but that maybe the standards are changing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackland, R. (2009). Social network services as data sources and platforms for e-researching social networks. Social Science Computer Review, 27, 481–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, P. B. (1996). Correlates of college women’s self-reports of heterosexual aggression. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 8, 121–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (2010). Ever sent a racy text to the wrong person?.

  • Attwood, F. (2009). ‘Deepthroatfucker’ and ‘Discerning Adonis” men and cybersex. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 12, 279–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagarozzi, D. A. (2008). Understanding and treating marital infidelity: A multidemensional model. The American Journal of Family Theory, 36, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barak, A., & King, S. A. (2000). The two faces of the internet: Introduction to the special issue on the internet and sexuality. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 3, 517–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barraket, J., & Henry-Waring, M. S. (2008). Getting it on(line): Sociological perspectives on e-dating. Journal of Sociology, 44, 149–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beasley, C. (2005). Gender and sexuality: Critical theories, critical thinkers. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berne, E. C. (2007). Online pornography. New York: Greenhaven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackstone, E. (1998). Virtual strangers: A woman’s guide to love and sex on the internet. Bellingham: Prospector Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowker, N., & Tuffin, K. (2004). Using the online medium for discursive research about people with disabilities. Social Science Computer Review, 22, 228–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. E. (2004). Getting it on online: Cyberspace, gay male sexuality, and Embodied Identity. New York: Harrington Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castaldo, J. (2009). Alone on the range. Canadian Business, 82, 32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, G. (2010). The 5 love languages: The secret to love that lasts. Chicago: Northfield Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charness, N., & Boot, W. R. (2009). Aging and information technology use: Potential and barriers. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 253–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. (2008). Web site makes millions by connecting cheaters. NPR.

  • Cooper, A., Mansson, S. A., & Daneback, K. (2003). Predicting the future of internet sex: Online sexual activies in Sweden. Sexual and Relation Therapy, 18, 277–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couch, D., & Liamputtong, P. (2008). Online dating and mating: The use of the internet to meet sexual partners. Qualitative Health Research, 18, 268–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Visser, R., & McDonald, Dee. (2007). Swings and roundabouts: Management of jealousy in heterosexual “swinging” couples. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 459–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys—The tailored design method. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2009). Internet, mail and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, R. (2009). The truth about online dating. Scientific American Mind, 20, 54–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, D., & Petersen, J. C. (2010). The growth of internet research methods and the reluctant sociologist. Sociological Inquiry, 80, 114–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, K. (2008). `Not gay, but not homophobic’: Male sexuality and homophobia in the ‘lifestyle’. Sexualities, 11, 435–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagnon, J., & Simon, W. (1973). Sexual deviance. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy: Sexuality, love and eroticism modern societies. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, S. P., & Staeheli, J. C. (2004). Not “just friends”: Rebuilding trust and recovering your sanity after infidelity. La Jolla, CA: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henline, B. H., Lamke, L. K., & Howard, M. D. (2007). Exploring perceptions of online infidelity. Personal Relationships, 14, 113–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horvath, K. J., Simon Rosser, B. R., & Remafedi, G. (2008). Sexual risk taking among young internet-using men who have sex with men. American Journal of Public Health, 98, 1059–1067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughey, M. W. (2008). Virtual (Br)others and (Re)sisters. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 37, 528–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • InterCommerce Corporation (2005). Survey net sex survey.

  • Johnson, E. (2007). Dreaming of a mail: Order husband: Russian-American internet romance. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. H. (2005). ‘You show me yours, I’ll show you mine’: The negotiation of shifts from textual to visual modes in computer-mediated interaction among gay men. Visual Communications, 4, 69–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kammeyer, K. C. (2008). A hypersexual society: Sexual discourse, erotica, and pornography in America today. New York City: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laws, J., & Schwartz, P. (1977). Sexual scripts: The social construction of female sexuality. Washington, DC: United Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J., & West, A. (2009). ‘Friending’: London-based undergraduates’ experience of Facebook. New Media Society, 11, 1209–1229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michael, R., Gagnon, J. H., Lauman, E., & Kolota, G. (1994). Sex in America: A definitive survey. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millner, V. (2008). Internet infidelity: A case of intimacy with detachment. The Family Journal, 16, 78–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitra, Ananda. (1996). Nations and the internet. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 2, 44–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitra, A., & Watts, E. (2002). Theorizing cyberspace: The idea of voice applied to the internet discourse. New Media & Society, 4, 479–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (2009). What is sexting? Why is it a problem? What parents and teens need to know. http://www.missingkids.com/missingkids/servlet/NewsEventServlet?LanguageCountry=en_US&PageId=4131.

  • Neuman, M. G. (2009). The truth about cheating: Why men stray and what you can do to prevent it. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nimrod, G. (2010). Seniors’ online communities: A quantitative content analysis. Gerontologist, 50, 382–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ono, H., & Tsai, H.-J. (2008). Race, parental socioeconomic status, and computer use time outside of school among young American children, 1997 to 2003. Journal of Family Issues, 29, 1650–1672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pittman, Frank. (1990). Private lies: Infidelity and the betrayal of intimacy. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, M. W., Rosser, B. R. S., & Stanton, J. (2004). Beliefs about cybersex and internet-mediated sex of Latino men who have internet sex with men: relationships with sexual practices in cybersex and in real life. AIDS Care, 16, 1002–1011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, M. W., Simon Rosser, B. R., McCurdy, S., & Feldman, J. (2007). The advantages and limitations of seeking sex online: A comparison of reasons given for online and offline sexual liaisons by men who have sex with men. Journal of Sex Research, 44, 59–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, T. (2008). Male sexual scripts. Sociology, 42, 400–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarmiento, J. W., & Shumar, W. (2010). Boundaries and roles: Positioning and social location in the virtual math teams (VMT) online community. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 524–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherrer, K. S. (2008). Coming to an asexual identity: Negotiating identity, negotiating desire. Sexualities, 11, 622–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schonfeld, E. (2008). Top social media sites of 2008 (Facebook Still Rising).

  • Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. (1984). Sexual scripts. Society, November/December, 53–60.

  • Spring, J. A., & Spring, M. (1997). After the affair: Healing the pain and rebuilding trust when a partner has been unfaithful. New York: Harper Paperbacks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, A. R. (1995). The war of desire and technology at the close of the mechanical age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the internet. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau (2010). Statistical Abstract of the U.S. Washington, DC.

  • Wagner, B. (2009). Becoming a sexual being: Overcoming constraints on female sexuality. Sexualities, 12, 289–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walther, J. B., Van Der Heide, B., Hamel, L. M., & Shulman, H. C. (2009). Self-generated versus other-generated statements and impressions in computer-mediated communication: A test of warranting theory using facebook. Communication Research, 36, 229–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitty, M. T. (2005). The realness of cybercheating: Men’s and women’s representations of unfaithful internet relationships. Social Science Computer Review, 23, 57–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitty, M., & Carr, A. (2006). Cyberspace romance: The psychology of online relationships. New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, E. A. (2008). Consciousness-raising 2.0: Sex blogging and the creation of a feminist sex commons. Feminism & Psychology, 18, 480–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wysocki, D. K. (1998). Let your fingers do the talking sex on an adult chat-line. Sexualities, 1, 425–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wysocki, D. K. (1999). Virtual sociology: Using computers in research. Iowa. Journal of Communication, 31, 59–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wysocki, D. K. (2001). Inherited bleeding disorders: Gynecologic and obsetric complications. The Female Patient, 26, 20–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wysocki, D. K., & Childers, C. (2009). Female sexuality in a survey of self magazine users. University of Nebraska at Kearney.

  • Wysocki, D. K., & Thalken, J. (2007). Whips and chains? Fact or fiction? Content analysis of sadomasochism in internet personal advertisements. In M. T. Whitty, A. J. Baker, & J. A. Inman (Eds.), Online matchmaking (pp. 178–196). New York City: Palgrave.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sociology Department, University of Nebraska at Kearney, Kearney, NE, 68845, USA

    Diane Kholos Wysocki

  2. Sociology Department, Washburn University, Topeka, KS, 66621, USA

    Cheryl D. Childers

Authors
  1. Diane Kholos Wysocki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cheryl D. Childers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diane Kholos Wysocki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wysocki, D.K., Childers, C.D. “Let My Fingers Do the Talking”: Sexting and Infidelity in Cyberspace. Sexuality & Culture 15, 217–239 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-011-9091-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-011-9091-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation