Skip to main content
Log in

Lesbian and bisexual women’s interpretations of lesbian and ersatz lesbian pornography

  • Articles
  • Published:
Sexuality and Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of the current study was to examine non-heterosexual women’s interpretations of “lesbian” material contained in pornography targeting male viewers and pornography made by and for lesbian women. Four focus groups were conducted (N=17) in which participants saw two pornographic sequences; one ostensibly for heterosexual males and the other for lesbian women. Participants then engaged in a semi-structured discussion for approximately 90 minutes. Conversations were tape-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed for themes. Stated briefly, results indicated that participants differentiated between the two sequences on a variety of dimensions including performers’ bodies, the emphasis on penetration, and the presence or absence of intimacy. The implications of these findings and ideas for subsequent research are outlined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asher, N.S., & Asher, K.C. (1999). Qualitative method for an outsider looking in: Lesbian women and body image. In M. Kopala & L.A. Suzuki (Eds.), Using qualitative methods in psychology (pp. 135–144). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boynton, P.M. (1999). “Is that supposed to be sexy?” Women discuss women in “top shelf” magazines. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 9: 449–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burger, J.R. (1995). One-handed histories: The eroto-politics of gay male video pornography. Binghamton, NY: Harrington Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciclitira, K. (2002). Researching pornography and sexual bodies. Psychologist 15: 191–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, M.T. (1997). Spectatorship in lesbian porn: The woman’s woman’s film. Wide Angle 19(3): 91–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, A. (1997). Life and death. New York, NY: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W.A., & Barak, A. (2001). Internet pornography: A social psychological perspective on Internet sexuality. The Journal of Sex Research 38: 312–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frith, H. (2000). Focusing on sex: Using focus groups in sex research. Sexualities 3: 275–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, L. (1992). Lesbian pornography: Cultural transgression and sexual demystification. In S. Munt (Ed.), New lesbian criticism (pp. 173–192). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenefsky, C., & Miller, D.H. (1998). Phallic intrusion: Girl-girl sex in Penthouse. Women’s Studies International Forum 21: 375–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, C.N. (1993). “Real dominant, real fun”: Gay male pornography and the pursuit of masculinity. Saskatchewan Law Review 57: 21–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kipnis, L. (2000). Pornography. In J. Hill & P.C. Gibson (Eds.). Film studies: Critical approaches (pp. 151–155). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malamuth, N.M., Addison, T., & Koss, M. (2000). Pornography and sexual aggression: Are there reliable effects and can we understand them? Annual Review of Sex Research 11: 26–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, T.G. (in press). “He was treating me like trash, and I was loving it:” Perspectives on gay male pornography. Journal of Homosexuality 47(3–4): 167–183.

  • Packard, T., & Schraibman, M. (1993–94). Lesbian pornography: Escaping the bonds of sexual stereotypes and strengthening our ties to one another. UCLA Women’s Law Journal 4: 299–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, B.L. (2000). “It’s merely designed for sexual arousal”: Interrogating the indefensibility of lesbian smut. In D. Cornell (Ed.), Feminism and pornography (pp. 264–317). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, L. (1992). Introduction. In L. Segal & M. McIntosh (Eds.), Sex exposed: Sexuality and the pornography debate (pp. 1–11). London, UK: Virago

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, L. (1998). Only the literal: The contradictions of anti-pornography feminism. Sexualities 1: 43–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sender, K. (2003). Sex sells: Sex, class, and taste in commercial gay and lesbian media. GLQ 9: 331–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonnet, E. (1999). “Erotic fiction by women for women”: The pleasures of post-feminist heterosexuality. Sexualities 2: 167–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoltenberg, J. (1989). Refusing to be a man: Essays on sex and justice. Portland, OR: Breitenbush Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J.A. (2000). Gay male video pornography: Past, present, and future. In R. Weitzer (Ed.), Sex for sale: Prostitution, pornography, and the sex industry (pp. 49–66), New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, N. (1986). The politics of pornography: A critique of liberalism and radical feminism. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology 22: 25–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waugh, T. (1996). Hard to imagine: Gay male eroticism in photography and film, from their beginnings to Stonewall. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzer, R. (2000). Why, we need more research on sex work. In R. Weitzer (Ed.), Sex for sale: Prostitution, pornography, and the sex industry (pp. 1–13): New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morrison, T.G., Tallack, D. Lesbian and bisexual women’s interpretations of lesbian and ersatz lesbian pornography. Sex Cult 9, 3–30 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-005-1005-x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-005-1005-x

Keywords

Navigation