Abstract
Four-field anthropology departments are no longer in a ‘steady state’. Their integrity is threatened by a combination of internal and external developments. It remains to be seen whether they, in combination, are powerful enough to break the historic bonds that have united them for nearly a century.
Similar content being viewed by others
Further Reading
Boas, F. 1904. In H. J. Rogers (Ed.), Address at the International Congress of Arts and Science, St. Louis (Vol. 5, pp. 468–482). Boston: Houghton and Mifflin.
Diogo, R., Richmond, B. G., & Wood, B. 2012. Evolution and homologies of modern human hand and forearm muscles: Thumb movements and tool use. Journal of Human Evolution, 63, 64–78.
Segal, D. A., & Yanagisako, S. 2005. Introduction. In D. A. Segal & S. Yanagisako (Eds.), Unwrapping the Sacred Bundle: Reflections on the disciplining of Anthropology (pp. 1–23). Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Silverstein, M. 2005. Languages/Cultures are dead! Long live the Linguistic-Cultural. In D. A. Segal & S. Yanagisako (Eds.), Unwrapping the Sacred Bundle: Reflections on the disciplining of Anthropology (pp. 99–125). Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Stocking, G. W. 1988. Guardians of the Sacred Bundle: The American Anthropological Association and the representation of holistic anthropology. In Learned Societies and the evolution of the disciplines. New York: American Council of Learned Societies.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wood, B. Four-Field Anthropology: A Perfect Union or a Failed State?. Soc 50, 152–155 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-013-9633-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-013-9633-5