Skip to main content
Log in

Credit Where Credit is Due?: Race, Gender, and Discrimination in the Credit Scores of Business Startups

  • Published:
The Review of Black Political Economy

Abstract

This research seeks to understand the degree to which credit scores of new business startups are influenced by racial or gender discrimination. It examines the degree to which access to business credit lines is influenced by racial and gender-related factors that go beyond would-be borrowers’ credit scores. Using credit data from new startups, the analysis finds that, when controlling for firm and human capital characteristics, Black-owned startups receive lower than expected business credit scores. Whites are more favorably treated in credit score determination than are African Americans with the same firm characteristics and owner characteristics. Moreover, Whites are more favorably treated when it comes to access to credit lines than are African Americans, Latinos, and Asians with the same firm characteristics, owner characteristics, and credit scores. Men are more favorably treated when it comes to access to credit lines than are women. A Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition suggests that credit lines for Black-owned businesses would more than double, Latino-owned businesses’ lines of credit would nearly triple, Asian-owned businesses’ lines of credit would more than triple, and those where the primary owners are women would be more than twice as large if their business lines of credit were determined in the same way as those for businesses owned primarily by Whites and by men. The implications of these results are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Audretsch DB. Innovation and industry evolution. Cambridge: M The MIT Press; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates T. “Unequal access: financial institution lending to black‐and white‐owned small business start‐ups.” J Urban Aff. 1997;19(4):487–95.

  • Bates T, Lofstrom M. “African Americans’ pursuit of self-employment.” Public Policy Institute of California Working Paper; 2008.

  • Bates T, Robb A. “Analysis of young neighborhood firms serving urban minority clients.” J Econ Bus. 2008;60(1):139–48.

  • Berger AN, Udell GF. A more complete conceptual framework for SME finance. J Bank Financ. 2006;30:2945–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger AN, Scott Frame W, Miller NH. Credit scoring and the availability, price, and risk of small business credit. J Money Credit Bank. 2005;37:191–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black HA, Robinson BL, Schweitzer RL. Do lenders discriminate against Low-income borrowers? Rev Black Polit Econ. 2001;28:73–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchflower DG, Levine PB, Zimmerman DJ. Discrimination in the small-business credit market. Rev Econ Stat. 2003;85:930–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blinder AS. Wage discrimination: reduced form and structural variables. J Hum Resour. 1973;8:436–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braunstein SF. Credit scoring: testimony before the subcommittee on financial institutions and consumer credit, the committee on financial services, US House of Representatives. 2010.

  • Brevoort KP. Credit card redlining revisited. Finance and economics discussion series, divisions of research & statistics and monetary affairs, Federal reserve board, Washington, D.C. 2009.

  • Caplovitz D. The consumer behavior of Low-income families. New York: Bureau of Applied Social Research, Columbia University; 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capon N. Credit scoring systems: a critical analysis. J Mark. 1982;46:82–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers BG, Ariovich L. Money and credit: a sociological approach. Malden: Polity Press; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalluzzo K, Wolken J. Small business loan turndowns, personal wealth and discrimination. J Bus. 2005;78:2153–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavalluzzo K, Cavalluzzo L, Wolken J. Competition, small business financing, and discrimination: evidence from a New survey. J Bus. 2002;75:641–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen MA. Report on the racial impact of GMAC’s Finance Charge Markup Policy, in the matter of Addie T. Coleman, et al. v. General Motors Acceptance Corporation (GMAC). 2003.

  • Cohen MA. Preliminary report on the racial impact of FMCC’s Finance Charge Markup Policy, in the matter of Joyce Jones, et al. v. Ford Motor Credit Company (FMCC), No. 00 Civ. 8330, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. 2004.

  • Cohen-Cole E. Credit card redlining. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston Working Paper No. QAU08-1. 2008.

  • Cole RA. The importance of relationships to the availability of credit. J Bank Financ. 1998;22:959–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole RA, Goldberg LG, White LJ. Cookie cutter vs. Character: the micro structure of small business lending by large and small banks. J Financ Quant Anal. 2004;39:227–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duca JV, Rosenthal SS. Borrowing constraints, household debt, and racial discrimination in loan markets. J Financ Intermed. 1993;3:77–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dun, Bradstreet. 2010. D&B Rating, PAYDEX®, and Score Tables. Available at: http://www.dnb.com/us/customer_service/paydex_tables.html#value[11/1/2010 12:37:59 AM].

  • Fairlie RW, Robb AM. Race and entrepreneurial success: black-, Asian- and white-owned businesses in the united states. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairlie R, Woodruff CM. Mexican-American entrepreneurship. The Berkeley Electronic Journals, Contributions to Economic Analysis & Policy. 2009;10(1):1–44.

  • Federal Reserve Board of New York. Access to credit: poll evidence from small businesses. New York: Federal Reserve Board of New York; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frame WS, Padhi M, Woolsey L. The effect of credit scoring on small business lending in Low- and moderate income areas. Financial Review. 2004;39:35–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herring C, Henderson L. Don’t bank on it: Chicago’s minority and Women’s business enterprise program and discrimination in business credit markets. Policy Forum. 2011;24:1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtz-Eakin D, Joulfaian D, Rosen HS. Sticking It Out: entrepreneurial survival and liquidity constraints. J Polit Econ. 1994;102(1):53–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huyghebaert N, Van de Gucht LM. Incumbent strategic behavior in financial markets and the exit of entrepreneurial startups. Strateg Manag J. 2004;25(7):669–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huyghebaert N, Van de Gucht LM. Determinants of financial structure. New insights from business startups. Eur Financ Manage. 2007;13(1):101–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huyghebaert N. On the determinants and dynamics of trade credit use: empirical evidence from business startups. J Bus Financ Account. 2006;33(1–2):305–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane T. The importance of startups in Job creation and Job destruction. Kansas City: Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lofstrom M, Wang C. “Mexican-Hispanic self-employment entry: the role of business start-up constraints.” Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 2007;613(1):32–46.

  • Massey DS, Denton N. American apartheid: segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mijid N, Bernasek A. 2013. Decomposing racial and ethnic differences in small business lending: evidence of discrimination. Review of social economy. Online First.

  • Nembhard JG, Marsh K. Wealth affirming policies for women of color. Rev Black Polit Econ. 2012;39:353–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oaxaca R. Male–female wage differentials in urban labor markets. Int Econ Rev. 1973;14:693–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver ML, Shapiro TM. Black wealth/white wealth: a new perspective on racial inequality. New York: Routledge; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pager D, Shepherd H. The sociology of discrimination: racial discrimination in employment, housing, credit, and consumer markets. Annu Rev Sociol. 2008;34:181–209.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Park Y, Coleman S. “Credit rationing and black-owned firms: is there evidence of discrimination?.” J Dev Entrep. 2009;14(3):255–71.

  • Peek J, Rosengren ES. Bank consolidation and small business lending: it’s not just bank size that matters. J Bank Financ. 1998;22:799–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson H. The survival and growth of New establishments in Sweden, 1987–1995. Small Bus Econ. 2004;23(5):423–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen MA, Rajan R. The effect of credit market competition on lending relationships. Q J Econ. 1995;110:407–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips S. The subprime crisis and African Americans. Rev Black Polit Econ. 2010;37:223–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robb A, Fairlie RW, Robinson DT. Financial capital injections among new black and white business ventures: evidence from the Kauffman firm survey. 2009 Unpublished Working Paper, Duke University, Durham, NC.

  • Spader JS. Beyond disparate impact: risk-based pricing and disparity in consumer credit history scores. Rev Black Polit Econ. 2010;37:61–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Squires GD, O’Connor S. Do lenders who redline make more money than lenders who don’t? Rev Black Polit Econ. 1993;21:83–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strahan PE, Weston JP. Small business lending and the changing structure of the banking industry. J Bank Financ. 1998;22:821–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor J. Income and wealth transfer effects of discrimination in small business lending. Rev Black Polit Econ. 2005;32:87–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tootell GMB. Redlining in Boston: Do mortgage lenders discriminate against neighborhoods? Q J Econ. 1996;111:1049–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weller CE. Credit access, the costs of credit and credit market discrimination. Rev Black Polit Econ. 2009;36:7–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Timothy Bates, John Sibley Butler, Rebel Cole, Kelsey Kapolnek, E. J. Reedy, Alicia Robb, Moshe Semyonov, and Yan Xing for their comments and suggestions on various drafts. We would also like to thank the anonymous reviewers at The Review of Black Political Economy who made constructive suggestions that strengthened the paper. We are also grateful to those who provided comments at the Academy of Management Conference and the American Sociological Association Conference where earlier versions of the paper were presented. Finally, we would like to acknowledge the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation for its financial support of this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Loren Henderson.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Henderson, L., Herring, C., Horton, H.D. et al. Credit Where Credit is Due?: Race, Gender, and Discrimination in the Credit Scores of Business Startups. Rev Black Polit Econ 42, 459–479 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12114-015-9215-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12114-015-9215-4

Keywords

Navigation