Skip to main content
Log in

Critical Inquiry into Urban African-American Students’ Perceptions of Engineering

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of African American Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to critically examine the perceptions that African-American high school students have towards engineering. A qualitative research design using criterion sampling and snowballing was used to select seven African-American students from urban high schools to participate in the research. Semi-structured interviews were used to collect data from participants attending urban high schools on the east and west coast. Using Critical Race Theory (CRT) as the theoretical framework, the study was able to produce “emergent themes” from collected data. Findings from this study will help researchers understand how African-American students may perceive the field of engineering.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The efforts of this study were funded by the National Center for Engineering and Technology Education (NCETE). NCETE is a collaborative network of scholars with backgrounds in technology education, engineering, and related fields. Developed in 2004 as a vehicle to drive the infusion of engineering design content into K-12 technology education curriculums, NCETE is one of 17 Centers for Learning and Teaching (CLT) funded by the National Science Foundation. The “ultimate” goal of NCETE is to infuse engineering design, problem solving and analytical skills into K-12 schools through technology education programs in order to increase the quality, quantity and diversity of engineering and technology educators (www.ncete.org).

References

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1998). Meeting America’s needs for the scientific and technological challenges of the twenty-first century: A White House roundtable dialogue for President Clinton’s initiative on race proceedings of panel discussion and position papers. Retrieved February 5, 2006 from clinton4.nara.gov/WH/EOP/OSTP/html/racelane.vcs.

  • Avison, D., Lau, F., Myers, M., & Nielsen, P. A. (1999). Action research. Communications of the ACM, 42(1), 94–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, N. (2005, November). Historical Context of Closing the Achievement Gap. Paper presented at the meeting for Challenges of Closing the Achievement Gap, Athens, GA.

  • Conde-Frazier, E. (2006). Participatory action research: practical theology for social justice. Religious Education, 101(3), 321–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. (1995). Critical race theory: The key writings that formed the movement. New York: New.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, J. W. (1997). Qualitative Inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspectives in the research process. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • deMarrais, K., & Lapan, S. D. (2004). Foundations for research: Methods of inquiry in education and the social sciences. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, A. D., & Rousseau, C. K. (2005). Critical race theory in education. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 7–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, C., Rodriguez, D., & Parker, L. (2000). Race, subjectivity, and the interview process.

  • Epstein, T. (2001). Racial identity and young people’s perspectives on social education. Theory into Practice, 40(1), 42–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, T. A., & Griggs, M. B. (1995). Factors that influence the career development of African-American and Latino youth. Journal of Vocational Educational Research, 20(2), 57–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flores, R., Oates, J., & Weishew, N. (1996). Achieving student success in inner-city schools is possible, provided . . . Retrieved on February 4, 2006 from www.temple.edu/lss/pdf/publications/pubs97-2.pdf.

  • Gordon, R. D. (2003). The history and growth of vocational education in America (pp. 45–49). Long Grove: Waveland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, H. R. (2006). Mentoring young men of color: Meeting the needs of African-American and Latino students. Oxford: Rowan & Littlefield Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing Qualitative research in educational settings. Albany: State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jencks, C., & Phillips, M. (1998). The black-white test score gap: An introduction. The black-white test score gap (pp. 1–51). Washington: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, L. T., Om-Ra-Seti, K. K. (1997). Black futurist in the information age: Vision of a twenty-first century technological renaissance. KMT Publications.

  • Johnson, K. V., & Watson, E. (2004). The W. E. B. Dubios and Booker T. Washington Debate: Effects upon African American roles in engineering and engineering education. The Journal of Technology Studies (pp. 65–70) Retrieved March 17, 2006 from http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JOTS/v30/v30n4/pdf/johnson.pdf .

  • Ladson-Billings, G. (1995a). But that’s just good teaching. The case for culturally relevant pedagogy. Theory into Practice, 34(3), 159–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladson-Billings, G. (1995b). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levit, N. (1999). Critical of race theory: race, merit and civility. Georgetown law journal.

  • Lipman, P. (1995). Bring out the best in them: the contribution of culturaaly relevant teachers to education reform. Theory into Practice, 34(3), 202–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lofland, J. (1971). Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis (pp. 90–133). Belmont: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, M., & Parker, L. (2006). Critical race studies in education: examining a decade of research on U.S. schools. The Urban Review.

  • Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (1989). Designing qualitative research (pp. 47–51). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maton, K. I., & Hrabowski, F. A., III. (2004). Increasing the number of African American PhDs in the sciences and engineering: a strength-based approach. American Psychologist, 59, 547–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuda, M., Lawrence, C., Delgado, R., & Crenshaw, K. (1993). Words that wound:critical race theory, assaultive speech and the first amendment. (Eds). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

  • McNiff, J. (2000). Action research in organizations. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Engineering. (2004). The engineer of 2020. Washington: The National Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Engineering. (2008). Changing the conversation: Messages for improving the public understanding of engineering. Washington: The National Academies.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics (2001). Educational achievement and black-white inequality. U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved August 28, 2002 from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2001061. (pp. 31–43).

  • O'Brien, R. (2001). An Overview of the Methodological Approach of Action Research] In Roberto Richardson (Ed.), Theory and Practice of Action Research. João Pessoa, Brazil: Universidade Federal da Paraíba. (English version) Available: http://www.web.ca/~robrien/papers/arfinal.html (Accessed 20/1/2002).

  • Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2001). Introduction: Inquiry and participation in search of a world worthy of human aspiration. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 1–14). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, L., & Morse, M. J. (2002). Read me first for a user’s guide to qualitative methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schell, J. W., & Schell, B. A. (2008). Learning and teaching for expert practice. In B. A. Schell & J. W. Schell (Eds.), Professional and clinical reasoning occupational therapy. Baltimore: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shujaa, M. J. (1995). Cultural self meets cultural other in the African-American experience: teachers’ responses to a curriculum content reform reform. Theory into Practice, 34(3), 194–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singham, M. (2003). The achievement gap: myths and reality. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(8), 592–595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stemler, S. (2001). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation 7 (17). Retrieved Dec. 3, 2008 from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=17.

  • Stovall, D. (2006). Forging community in race and class: critical race theory and the quest for social justice in education. Race ethnicity and Education, 9(3), 243–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swepson, P. (1995). Action research: understanding its philosophy can improve your practice[On-line]. Availableat http://www.scu.edu.au/schools/gcm/ar/arp/philos.html.

  • Tate, W. F. (1995). Returning to the root: culturally relevant approach to mathematics pedagogy. Theory into Practice, 34(3), 166–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wharton, D. E. (1992). A struggle worthy of note: The engineering and technological education of Black Americans. Connecticut: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicklein, R. C. (2006). Five good reasons for engineering design as the focus for technology education. The Technology Teacher, 65(7), 25–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodson, C. G. (1933). The mis-education of the Negro. Chicago: African American Images.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0426421. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cameron D. Denson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Denson, C.D., Avery, Z.K. & Schell, J.W. Critical Inquiry into Urban African-American Students’ Perceptions of Engineering. J Afr Am St 14, 61–74 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12111-009-9107-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12111-009-9107-4

Keywords

Navigation