Abstract
It is common to portray conservative and liberal Protestant denominations as “strong” and “weak” on the basis of indices such as church attendance. Alternatively, they can be regarded as qualitatively different cultural systems that coexist in a multiple-niche environment. We integrate these two perspectives with a study of American teenagers based on both one-time survey information and the experience sampling method (ESM), which records individual experience on a moment-by-moment basis. Conservative Protestant youth were found to be more satisfied, family-oriented, and sociable than liberal Protestant youth, but also more dependent on their social environment, which is reflected in a deterioration of their mood when they are alone. Liberal Protestant youth appear to have internalized values that remain constant whether in the presence or absence of others. We relate these results to the social scientific literature on liberalism and conservatism and to evolutionary theory as a framework for explaining cultural systems as adaptations to multiple-niche environments.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altemeyer, B. (1988). Enemies of freedom: understanding right-wing authoritarianism. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Barker, E. (1996). The freedom of the cage. Society, 33(3), 53–59.
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.
Boshier, R. W. (1973). Conservatism within families: a study of the generation gap. In G. D. Wilson (Ed.), The psychology of conservatism (pp. 209–224). London: Academic.
Csikszentmihaly, M., & Schneider, B. (2000). Becoming adult: how teenagers prepare for the world of work. New York: Basic Books.
Evans, J. H. (2003). The creation of a distinct subcultural identity and denominational growth. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 42, 467–477.
Greeley, A. M., & Hout, M. (2006). The truth about conservative Christians: what they think and what they believe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gunnoe, M. L., & Moore, K. A. (2002). Predictors of religiosity among youth aged 17–22: a longitudinal study. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 41, 613–622.
Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2008). The moral mind: how five sets of innate intuitions guide the development of many culture-specific virtues, and perhaps even modules. In P. Carruthers, S. Laurence, & S. Stich (Eds.), Foundations and the future. The innate mind (vol. 3, pp. 367–391). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harris, R. J. (2001). A primer of multivariate statistics, third ed. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Iannaccone, L. R. (1994). Why strict churches are strong. American Journal of Sociology, 99, 1180–1211.
Johnson, D. D. P., & Bering, J. M. (2006). Hand of God, mind of man: punishment and cognition in the evolution of cooperation. Evolutionary Psychology, 4, 219–233.
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375.
Kelley, D. M. (1977). Why conservative churches are growing: a study in the sociology of religion. San Francisco: Harper and Row.
Lakoff, G. (1996). Moral politics: what conservatives know that liberals don't. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2004). Sacred and secular: religion and politics worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
O’Gorman, R., Wilson, D. S., & Miller, R. R. (2005). Altruistic punishing and helping differ in sensitivity to relatedness, friendship, and future interactions. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 375–387.
Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (2005). Not by genes alone. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Schieman, S., Pudrovska, T., Pearlin, L., & Ellison, C. (2006). The sense of divine control and psychological distress: variations across race and socioeconomic status. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 45, 529–549.
Smith, T. W. (1990). Classifying Protestant denominations. Review of Religious Research, 31, 225–245.
Smith, C. (2005). Soul searching: the religious and spiritual lives of American teenagers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sober, E., & Wilson, D. S. (1998). Unto others: the evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Stark, R. (2002). Physiology and faith: addressing the “universal” gender difference in religious commitment. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 41, 495–507.
Stark, R., & Bainbridge, W. S. (1997). Religion, deviance and social control. New York: Routledge.
Stark, R., & Finke, R. (2000). Acts of faith: explaining the human side of religion. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Steensland, B., Park, J. Z., Regnerus, M. D., Robinson, L. D., Wilcox, W. B., & Woodberry, R. D. (2000). The measure of American religion: toward improving the state of the art. Social Forces, 79, 291–318.
Thornhill, R., & Fincher, C. L. (2007). What is the relevance of attachment and life history to political values? Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 215–222.
Wilson, D. S. (2002). Darwin’s cathedral: evolution, religion and the nature of society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wilson, D. S. (2005). Testing major evolutionary hypotheses about religion with a random sample. Human Nature, 16, 382–409.
Wilson, D. S., & Csikszentmihaly, M. (2007). Health and the ecology of altruism. In S. G. Post (Ed.), Altruism and health: perspectives from empirical research (pp. 314–331). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wuthnow, R. (1988). The restructuring of American religion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Wuthnow, R. (1989). The struggle for America’s soul. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
Acknowledgments
Thanks to Mihaly Csikszentmihaly and Barbara Schneider for sharing their data, and to David Voas, Nick Shryane, and the anonymous reviewers for helpful comments and advice.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Storm, I., Wilson, D.S. Liberal and Conservative Protestant Denominations as Different Socioecological Strategies. Hum Nat 20, 1–24 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-008-9055-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-008-9055-z