Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sociologists of the unexpected: Edward A. Ross and Georg Sinimel on the unintended consequences of modernity

  • Published:
The American Sociologist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The modern increase in opportunities for social activities also brings with it unintended side effects posed by the liberating potential and the acceleration of modern life. In this paper it is argued that the views reflected in Georg Simmel’s formal approach and in American sociologist Edward A. Ross’ reformative sociology are (1) complementary and (2) offer fresh insights for our current sociological understanding of unexpected consequences in contemporary “high modernity” or knowledge societies. A long forgotten nexus between the ideas of Simmel’s and the work of Ross will be reviewed in order to point out affinities between the two authors’ takes on the unintended and sometimes tragic moments in modern culture and their relevance for sociology today. Based on these discussions a fundamental mode for framing the unexpected in modern society as a recursively-linked component to the intended is illustrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, Henry. 1918. The Education of Henry Adams: An Autobiography. Boston: Houghton & Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, Isadora. 1962. Die Tragik in der Existenz des modernen Menschen bei G Simmel. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Ulrich. 1997. The Reinvention of Politics: Rethinking Modernity in the Global Social Order. Oxford: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Ulrich; Bonss, Wolfgang and Christoph Lau. 2003. “The Theory of Reflexive Modernization: Problematic, Hypotheses and Research Programme.” Theory, Culture, & Society 20 (2): 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, Daniel. 1973. The Coming of Post-industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bökhme, Gernot and Nico Stehr. 1986. The Knowledge Society: The Growing Impact of Scientific Knowledge on Social Relations. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catton, William R., Jr. 2002. “Has the Durkheim Legacy Misled Sociology?” Pp. 90–115 in Dunlap, Riley E.; Büttel, Frederick H.; Dickens, Peter and August Gijswit (eds.), Sociological Theory and the Environment. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coser, Lewis A. 1977 [1971]. Masters of Sociological Thought: Ideas in Historical and Social Context. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1982. “The Notion of Control in Sociological Theory.” Pp. 13–22 in Gibbs, Jack P. (ed.), Social Control: Views from the Social Sciences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deflem, Mathieu. 2003. “The Sociology of the Sociology of Money: Simmel and the Contemporary Battle of the Classics.” Journal of Classical Sociology 3 (1): 67–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, Peter F. 1969. The Age of Discontinuity: Guidelines to Our Changing Society. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Emile. 1933 [1893]. The Division of Labor in Society. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuhrman, Ellsworth R. 1980. The Sociology of Knowledge in America: 1883-1915. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gassen, Kurt and Michael Landmann. 1958. Buch des Dankes an Georg Simmel: Briefe, Erinnerungen, Bibliographie; zu seinem 100. Geburtstag am 1. März 1958. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, Anthony. 1990. The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1999. Runaway World: How Globalization is Reshaping Our Lives. London: Profile Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, Matthias. 2001 a. Die Natur der Gesellschaft: Eine Geschichte der Umweltsoziologie. Weinheim, Germany: Juventa Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2001b. “Urban Nature, Modern Society, and the Marginal Man: Robert E. Park and Georg Simmel in Discussion.” Simmel Studies 11 (2): 235–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2002. “When Ecology and Sociology Meet: The Contributions of Edward A. Ross.” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 38 (1): 27–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 2003. Inventing Nature: Ecological Restoration by Public Experiments. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guggenheim, Michael and Helga Nowotny. 2003. “Joy in Repetition Makes the Future Disappear. A Critical Assessment of the Present State of STS.” Pp. 229–258 in Joerges, Bernward and Helga Nowotny (eds.), Social Studies of Science & Technology: Looking Back, Ahead. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihde, Don and Evan Selinger. 2003. Chasing Technoscience: Matrix for Materiality. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski, Gary D. 1997. Georg Simmel and the American Prospect. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köhnke, Klaus Christian. 1996. Der junge Simmel in Theoriebeziehungen und sozialen Bewegungen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krohn, Wolfgang. 2001. “Knowledge Societies.” Pp. 8139–8143 in Smelser, Neil J. and Paul B. Baltes (eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krohn, Wolfgang and Johannes Weyer. 1994. “Society as a Laboratory: The Social Risks of Experimental Research,” Science and Public Policy 21 (3): 173–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krohn, Wolfgang and Wolfgang van den Daele. 1998. “Science as an Agent of Change: Finalization and Experimental Implementation.” Social Science Information 37 (1): 191–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, Robert E. 1966. “The Decline of Politics and Ideology in a Knowledgeable Society.” American Sociological Review 31(5): 649–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leek, Ralph M. 2000. Georg Simmel and Avant-garde Sociology: The Birth of Modernity, 1880-1920. Amherst, N.Y.: Humanity Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, Donald N. 1988. The Flight from Ambiguity: Essays in Social and Cultural Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2000. “On the Critique of’Utilitarian’ Theories of Action: Newly Identified Convergences among Simmel, Weber, and Parsons.” Theory, Culture, & Society 17 (1): 63–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, Donald N.; Carter, Ellwood B. and Eleanor M. Gorman. 1976. “Simmel’s Influence on American Sociology-pt. I and II.” American Journal of Sociology 81 (4/5): 813–845; 1112-1132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtblau, Klaus. 1984. “Das ’Pathos der Distanz’-Präliminarien zur Nietzsche-Rezeption bei Georg Simmel. ” Pp. 231–281 in Dahme, Heinz-Jürgen and Otthein Rammstedt (eds.), Georg Simmel und die Moderne. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopata, Helena Z. 1976. “Expertization of Everyone and the Revolt of the Client.” The Sociological Quarterly 17 (4): 435–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machlup, Fritz. 1962. The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, Sean H. 1999. Social Control and Public Intellect: The Legacy of Edward A. Ross. New York: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, Robert K. 1936. “The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social Action.” American Sociological Review 1 (6): 894–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1968 [1949]. Social Theory and Social Structure. Glencoe: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulkay, Michael J. 1979. Science and the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, Lawrence T. 1996. “Intergenerational Solidarity in the Creation of Science: The Ross-Sorokin Correspondence, 1921-1931.” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 32 (2): 135–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1997. “Sociological Paradigms and Civilizational Studies: Complementary Contributions of E. A. Ross and P. A. Sorokin.” Comparative Civilizations Review 36 (1): 16–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2001. “Parsons and Simmel at Harvard: Scientific Paradigms and Organizational Culture.” Pp. 1–28 in Trevino, A. Javier (ed.), Talcott Parsons Today: His Theory and Legacy in Contemporary Sociology. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1993 [1872]. The Birth of Tragedy Out of the Spirit of Music. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowotny, Helga; Scott, Peter und Michael Gibbons. 2001. Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Oxford: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papilloud, Christian. 2003. La Réciprocité. Paris: L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, Robert E. 1940. “News as a Form of Knowledge: A Chapter in the Sociology of Knowledge.” American Journal of Sociology 45 (5): 669–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portes, Alejandro. 2000. “The Hidden Abode: Sociology as Analysis of the Unexpected.” American Sociological Review 65 (1): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, Derek J. de Solla. 1961. Science since Babylon. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, Edward A. 1916 [1901]. Social Control: A Survey of the Foundations of Order. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1901. “The Causes of Race Superiority.” Annals of “the American Academy of Political and Social Science 18 (1): 67–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1905. Foundations of Sociology. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1909. “Review of Georg Simmel’s Soziologie.” Philosophical Review 18 (6): 672–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1929 [1909]. Social Psychology: An Outline and Source Book. NewYork: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1911. “Sociological Observations in Inner China.” American journal of Sociology 17 (6): 721–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1918. “Social Decadence.” American Journal of Sociology 23 (5): 620–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1920. The Principles of Sociology. New York: The Century Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1926. “The Population Boosters.” Journal of ’Applied Sociology 9: 403–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1927a. “The Man-Stifled Orient.” Century 114: 275–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1927b. Standing Room Only? New York: The Century Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1934. “The Population Pyramid.” Pp. 134–140 in McKenzie, Roderick D. (ed.), Readings in Human Ecology (pp. 134-140). Ann Arbor, Michigan: George Wahr.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1936. Seventy Years of it: An Autobiography. New York: The Century Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, Georg. 1989 [1890]. Über Sociale Differenzierung (Gesamtausgabe 2). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1895. “The Problem of Sociology.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 6 (3): 412–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1897/1898. “The Persistence of Social Groups I — III,” American Journal of Sociology 3 (5): 662–698; 3 (6): 829-836; 4(1): 35-50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1900. Philosophie des Geldes. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1903. “Die Großstädte und das Geistesleben,“ Jahrbuch der Gehestiftung 9: 187–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1912 [1906]. Die Religion. Frankfurt am Main: Rütten & Loening.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1907. Schopenhauer und Nietzsche: Ein Vortragszyklus. München und Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1992 [1908]. Soziologie: Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1909. “Die Zukunft unserer Kultur: Stimmen über Kulturtendenzen und Kulturpolitik,” Frankfurter Zeitung, 1. Morgenblatt (hf A 14): 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1910. “Note on the Problem: How is Society Possible?” American Journal of Sociology 16 (5): 372–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1998 [1911]. Philosophische Kultur. Gesammelte Essais. Berlin: Wagenbach.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1918. Der Konflikt der Kultur. Ein Vortrag. München und Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1993. Das Individuum und die Freiheit. Essais. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorokin, Pitirim A. 1941. The Crisis of our Age: The Social and Cultural Outlook. NewYork: Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spellman, William E. 1979. “The Economics of Edward Alsworth Ross,” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 38 (2): 129–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stehr, Nico. 1994. Knowledge Societies: The Transformation of Labor, Property, and Knowledge in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, Laurel N. and Daniel Tanner. 1987. “Environmentalism in American Pedagogy: The Legacy of Lester Ward,” Teachers College Records (4): 537-547.

  • Vidich, Arthur J. and Stanford M. Lyman. 1985. American Sociology: Worldly Rejections of Religion and their Directions. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, Lester F. 1903. Pure Sociology: A Treatise on the Origin and Spontaneous Development of Society. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weigert, Andrew J. 1997. Self Interaction, and Natural Environment: Refocusing our Eyesight. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, Julius. 1972. Edward Alsworth Ross and the Sociology ofProgressivism. Madison: The State Historical Society of Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildavsky, Aaron. 1995. But Is It True? A Citizen’s Guide to Environmental Health and Safety Issues. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, Kurt H. 2003. What it Contains. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolgar, Steve. 1983. “Irony in the Social Sciences.” Pp. 239–266 in Knorr Cetina, Karin and Michael Mulkay (eds.), Science Observed: Perspectives in the Social Study of Science. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Znaniecki, Florian. 1940. The Social Role of the Man of Knowledge. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bielefeld University, USA

    Matthias Gross (co-director)

Authors
  1. Matthias Gross
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthias Gross.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gross, M. Sociologists of the unexpected: Edward A. Ross and Georg Sinimel on the unintended consequences of modernity. Am Soc 34, 40–58 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-003-1015-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-003-1015-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation