Skip to main content
Log in

Sex Disaggregated Trajectories of Status Offenders: Does CINS/FINS Status Prevent Male and Female Youth From Becoming Labeled Delinquent?

  • Published:
American Journal of Criminal Justice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study sought to provide a more recent and longitudinal examination of the effect of formal processing on status offenders’ subsequent delinquency using data from a large sample of first-time referral status offenders in the state of Florida. Results from semi-parametric group-based trajectory models suggested that roughly half of the status offenders subsequently accumulated delinquent arrests in adolescence following their initial referral for a status offense. Furthermore, the number and type of trajectory groups were more similar than different across sex. Study limitations and policy implications are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. There was demographic information missing for only 13 of the CINS/FINS youth from the entire state of Florida.

  2. A handful of cases were removed because they involved transfers to adult court.

References

  • Acoca, L. (1999). Investing in girls: A 21st century challenge. Juvenile Justice, 6, 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartollas, C. (1993). Little girls grown up: The perils of institutionalization. In C. Culliver (Ed.), Female criminality: The state of the art. New York: Garland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benda, B. B. (1987). Comparison of rates of recidivism among status offenders and delinquents. Adolescence, 22, 445–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binder, A. (1988). Juvenile delinquency. Annual Review of Psychology, 39, 253–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boisvert, M. J., & Wells, R. (1980). Toward a rational policy on status offenders. Social Work, 25, 230–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesney-Lind, M. (2004). Girls and violence: Is the gender gap closing? Washington: National Resource Center on Domestic Violence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesney-Lind, M., & Okamoto, S. K. (2001). Gender matters: Patterns in girls’ delinquency and gender responsive programming. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 1, 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Datesman, S. K., & Aickin, M. (1985). Offense specialization and escalation among status offenders. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 75, 1246–1275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Unger, A. V., Land, K. C., & McCall, P. L. (2002). Sex differences in age patterns of delinquent/criminal careers: Results from Poisson latent class analyses of the Philadelphia Cohort Study. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18, 349–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, M. L. (1979). Some empirical questions concerning the current revolution in juvenile justice. In L. T. Empey (Ed.), Future of childhood and juvenile justice (pp. 277–311). Charlottlesville: University Press of Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2003). Crime in the United States, 2002. Washington: U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida Department of Juvenile Justice. (2010). CINS/FINS. Retrieved online on December 15, 2010 from http://www.djj.state.fl.us/Prevention/CINSFINS.html.

  • Jennings, W. G., Gibson, C. L., & Lanza-Kaduce, L. (2009). Why not let kids be kids? An exploratory analysis of the impact of alternative rationales for managing status offending on youths’ self-concepts. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 34, 198–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, W. G., Maldonado-Molina, M., Piquero, A. R., Odgers, C., Bird, H., & Canino, G. (2010a). Sex differences in trajectories of offending among Puerto Rican youth. Crime & Delinquency, 56, 327–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, W. G., Maldonado-Molina, M., & Komro, K. A. (2010b). Sex similarities/differences in trajectories of delinquency among urban Chicago youth: The role of delinquent peers. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 35, 56–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junger-Tas, J., & Marshall, I. H. (1999). The self-report methodology in crime research. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and Justice (Vol. 25). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, T. M. (1983). Status offenders can be different: A comparative study of delinquent careers. Crime and Delinquency, 29, 365–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kobrin, S., & Klein, M. W. (1981). National evaluation of he deinstitutionalization of status offender programs (Vol. I and II). Washington: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, W., & McShane, M. D. (1994). A deinstitutionalization retrospective: Relabeling the status offender. Journal of Crime & Justice, 17, 45–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krisberg, B. (2005). Juvenile justice: Redeeming our children. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land, K. C., McCall, P. L., & Nagin, D. S. (1996). A comparison of Poisson, Negative Binomial, and Semiparametric Mixed Poisson Regression Models with empirical applications to criminal careers research. Sociological Methods & Research, 24, 387–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemert, E. M. (1951). Social pathology. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemert, E. M. (1967). Human deviance, social problems, and social control. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagin, D. S. (2004). Response to “Methodological sensitivities to latent class analysis of long-term criminal career trajectories”. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 20, 27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagin, D. S. (2005). Group-based modeling of development. Cambridge: University of Harvard Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagin, D. S., & Farrington, D. P. (1992). The onset and persistence of offending. Criminology, 30, 301–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagin, D. S., & Land, K. C. (1993). Age, criminal Careers, and population heterogeneity: Specification and estimation of a nonparametric, mixed Poisson model. Criminology, 31, 327–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piquero, A. R. (2008). Taking stock of developmental trajectories of criminal activity over the life course. In A. M. Liberman (Ed.), The long view of crime: A synthesis of longitudinal research (pp. 23–60): Springer.

  • Piquero, A. R., Farrington, D. P., & Blumstein, A. (2003). The criminal career paradigm. Crime and Justice, 30, 359–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raley, G. A. (1995). The JJDP Act: A second look. Washington: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rausch, S. (1983). Court processing versus diversion of status offenders: A test of deterrence and labeling theories. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 20, 39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schur, E. M. (1973). Radical nonintervention: Rethinking the delinquency problem. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelden, R. G., Horvath, J. A., & Tracy, S. (1989). Do status offenders get worse? Some clarifications on the question of escalation. Crime and Delinquency, 35, 202–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinhart, D. J. (1996). Status offenses. The Future of Children, 6, 86–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, M. J., Vockell, E. L., & Ray, R. E. (1986). Decreasing court appearance of juvenile status offenders. Social Casework, 67, 74–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennebaum, F. (1938). Crime and the community. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, C. W. (1976). Are status offenders really so different? A comparative and longitudinal assessment. Crime and Delinquency, 22, 438–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The author would like to offer a sincere thanks to Dr. Charles Frazier for his assistance with acquiring the data for this project and helpful comments on an earlier draft of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wesley G. Jennings.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jennings, W.G. Sex Disaggregated Trajectories of Status Offenders: Does CINS/FINS Status Prevent Male and Female Youth From Becoming Labeled Delinquent?. Am J Crim Just 36, 177–187 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-011-9109-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-011-9109-3

Keywords

Navigation