Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

RAS status in Korean patients with stage III and IV colorectal cancer

  • Brief Research Article
  • Published:
Clinical and Translational Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

KRAS mutations are common and clearly contribute to malignant progression. The frequency of NRAS mutations and their relationship to clinical, pathologic, and molecular features remains unclear.

Methods

We evaluated 130 colorectal tumors for mutations in KRAS and NRAS gene. We tested for mutations in codons 61 and 146 of KRAS and codons 12, 13, 59, 61 and 146 of NRAS. Mutation status was determined by targeted dideoxy sequencing.

Results

Among the analyzed primary tumors, 36.2 % had KRAS mutation. Of the 83 KRAS codon 12 and 13 wild-type patients, 7.2 % had KRAS codon 61, 146 or NRAS. 40.7 % harbored any RAS mutation.

Conclusion

The frequency of other RAS (NRAS and KRAS exon 3, 4) activating mutations in colorectal cancers is relatively low in Korean colorectal cancer patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lee W-S, Baek JH, Lee JN, Lee WK. Mutations in K-ras and epidermal growth factor receptor expression in Korean patients with stages III and IV colorectal cancer. Int J Surg Pathol. 2011;19(2):145–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shin A, Kim K-Z, Jung K-W, Park S, Won Y-J, Kim J, et al. Increasing trend of colorectal cancer incidence in Korea, 1999–2009. Cancer Res Treat Off J Korean Cancer Assoc. 2012;44(4):219–26.

    Google Scholar 

  3. De Roock W, Piessevaux H, De Schutter J, Janssens M, De Hertogh G, Personeni N, et al. KRAS wild-type state predicts survival and is associated to early radiological response in metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol ESMO. 2008;19(3):508–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lièvre A, Bachet J-B, Boige V, Cayre A, Le Corre D, Buc E, et al. KRAS mutations as an independent prognostic factor in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2008;26(3):374–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Malumbres M, Barbacid M. RAS oncogenes: the first 30 years. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003;3(6):459–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Irahara N, Baba Y, Nosho K, Shima K, Yan L, Dias-Santagata D, et al. NRAS mutations are rare in colorectal cancer. Diagn Mol Pathol Am J Surg Pathol. 2010;19(3):157–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Diaz-Flores E, Shannon K. Targeting oncogenic Ras. Genes Dev. 2007;21(16):1989–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schubbert S, Shannon K, Bollag G. Hyperactive Ras in developmental disorders and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7(4):295–308.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Loupakis F, Ruzzo A, Cremolini C, Vincenzi B, Salvatore L, Santini D, et al. KRAS codon 61, 146 and BRAF mutations predict resistance to cetuximab plus irinotecan in KRAS codon 12 and 13 wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2009;101(4):715–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Vaughn CP, Zobell SD, Furtado LV, Baker CL, Samowitz WS. Frequency of KRAS, BRAF, and NRAS mutations in colorectal cancer. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2011;50(5):307–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Allegra CJ, Jessup JM, Somerfield MR, Hamilton SR, Hammond EH, Hayes DF, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology provisional clinical opinion: testing for KRAS gene mutations in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma to predict response to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody therapy. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2009;27(12):2091–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Parikh C, Subrahmanyam R, Ren R. Oncogenic NRAS, KRAS, and HRAS exhibit different leukemogenic potentials in mice. Cancer Res. 2007;67(15):7139–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Parikh C, Ren R. Mouse model for NRAS-induced leukemogenesis. Methods Enzymol. 2008;439:15–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Campbell SL, Khosravi-Far R, Rossman KL, Clark GJ, Der CJ. Increasing complexity of Ras signaling. Oncogene. 1998;17(11 Reviews):1395–413.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Demunter A, Stas M, Degreef H, De Wolf-Peeters C, van den Oord JJ. Analysis of N- and K-ras mutations in the distinctive tumor progression phases of melanoma. J Invest Dermatol. 2001;117(6):1483–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Vogelstein B, Fearon ER, Hamilton SR, Kern SE, Preisinger AC, Leppert M, et al. Genetic alterations during colorectal-tumor development. N Engl J Med. 1988;319(9):525–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Haigis KM, Kendall KR, Wang Y, Cheung A, Haigis MC, Glickman JN, et al. Differential effects of oncogenic K-Ras and N-Ras on proliferation, differentiation and tumor progression in the colon. Nat Genet. 2008;40(5):600–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yun J, Rago C, Cheong I, Pagliarini R, Angenendt P, Rajagopalan H, et al. Glucose deprivation contributes to the development of KRAS pathway mutations in tumor cells. Science. 2009;325(5947):1555–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Douillard J-Y, Oliner KS, Siena S, Tabernero J, Burkes R, Barugel M, et al. Panitumumab–FOLFOX4 treatment and RAS mutations in colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(11):1023–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Van Cutsem E, Köhne C-H, Hitre E, Zaluski J, Chang Chien C-R, Makhson A, et al. Cetuximab and chemotherapy as initial treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(14):1408–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bokemeyer C, Bondarenko I, Hartmann JT, Braud F de, Schuch G, Zubel A, et al. Efficacy according to biomarker status of cetuximab plus FOLFOX-4 as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: the OPUS study. Ann Oncol. 12 Jan 2011;mdq632.

  22. Schwartzberg LS, Rivera F, Karthaus M, Fasola G, Canon J-L, Hecht JR, et al. PEAK: A Randomized, multicenter phase II study of panitumumab plus modified fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) or bevacizumab plus mfolfox6 in patients with previously untreated, unresectable, wild-type KRAS exon 2 metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 31 Mar 2014; JCO.2013.53.2473.

  23. Modest D, von Weikersthal LF, Stintzing S, Decker T, Kiani A, Vehling-Kaiser U, et al. O-0029folfiri plus cetuximab versus folfiri plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment of Kras-wildtype metastatic colorectal cancer: German Aio Study Krk-0306 (fire-3). Ann Oncol. 2013;24(suppl 4):iv22–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Douillard J-Y, Siena S, Cassidy J, Tabernero J, Burkes R, Barugel M, et al. Randomized, phase III trial of panitumumab with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) versus FOLFOX4 alone as first-line treatment in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: the Prime study. J Clin Oncol. 4 Oct 2010; JCO.2009.27.4860.

  25. Bazan V, Migliavacca M, Zanna I, Tubiolo C, Grassi N, Latteri MA, et al. Specific codon 13 K-ras mutations are predictive of clinical outcome in colorectal cancer patients, whereas codon 12 K-ras mutations are associated with mucinous histotype. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol ESMO. 2002;13(9):1438–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Calvo E, Baselga J. Ethnic Differences in response to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(14):2158–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. De Roock W, Claes B, Bernasconi D, De Schutter J, Biesmans B, Fountzilas G, et al. Effects of KRAS, BRAF, NRAS, and PIK3CA mutations on the efficacy of cetuximab plus chemotherapy in chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective consortium analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(8):753–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Di Nicolantonio F, Martini M, Molinari F, Sartore-Bianchi A, Arena S, Saletti P, et al. Wild-type BRAF is required for response to panitumumab or cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2008;26(35):5705–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant of the Gil Medical Center, Gachon University (2013-48) to W-S. L. We thank CKDpharm for their generous support.

Conflict of interest

All of the listed authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W.-S. Lee.

Additional information

W.-S. Lee and J. N. Lee equally contributed as first authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, WS., Lee, J.N., Baek, JH. et al. RAS status in Korean patients with stage III and IV colorectal cancer. Clin Transl Oncol 17, 751–756 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-015-1301-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-015-1301-3

Keywords

Navigation