Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Differential Perception of Caffeine Bitter Taste Depending on Smoking Status

  • Published:
Chemosensory Perception

Abstract

Taste impairment may be associated with tobacco smoking. We assessed taste recognition and intensity among healthy middle-aged current smokers (N = 94, 21 %), former smokers (N = 48, 11 %) and non-smokers (N = 309, 69 %) recruited on a voluntary basis among hospital staff. By means of a whole-mouth gustatory test, participants tasted one concentration of the four basic tastes (NaCl 34 mM, sucrose 58 mM, acetic acid 60 mM, caffeine 1.5 mM for salty, sweet, sour and bitter tastes, respectively) and completed a questionnaire for taste recognition and intensity (ranging from 0 to 10). The recognition of salty, sweet and sour tastes was not influenced by smoking status. Bitter taste recognition was wrong among 13.4, 19.8 and 26.5 % of non-smokers, current smokers and former smokers, respectively (p = 0.043). The adjusted odds ratio (95 % confidence interval) of correct bitter taste recognition was 0.31 (0.14–0.69) among former and 0.74 (0.35–1.55) among current smokers (p = 0.016), compared to non-smokers while adjusting for gender, age, year of assessment and bitter taste intensity. The distribution of caffeine’s bitter taste intensity was bimodal regardless of the smoking status. The differential perception of caffeine’s bitter taste by current and former smokers is likely to be caused by a toxic process. As taste impairment persists in former smokers, the bioaccumulation of some tobacco/combustion products might be responsible for the disequilibrium in taste buds regeneration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker KA, Dicock EA, Kemm JR et al (1983) Effect of age, sex and illness on salt taste detection thresholds. Age Ageing 12:159–165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bartoshuk LM (1989) Taste. Robust across the age span? Ann N Y Acad Sci 561:65–75

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beck F, Guignard R (2010) Prevalence of smoking in France in 2010. INPES, Département « Enquêtes et analyse statistiques » www.inpes.sante.fr/Barometres/barometre-sante-2010/pdf/prevalence-tabagisme.pdf

  • Benowitz NL (2010) Nicotine addiction. N Engl J Med 362:2295–2303

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon DS, Baker TB, Piper ME et al (2005) Associations between phenylthiocarbamide gene polymorphisms and cigarette smoking. Nicotine Tob Res 7:853–858

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter CM, Wayne GF, Connolly GN (2007) The role of sensory perception in the development and targeting of tobacco products. Addiction 102:136–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dsamou M, Palicki O, Septeir C et al (2012) Salivary protein profiles and sensitivity to the bitter taste of caffeine. Chem Senses 37:87–95

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy VB, Hayes JE, Sullivan BS et al (2009) Surveying food/beverage liking: a tool for epidemiological studies to connect chemosensation with health outcomes. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1170:558–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enoch M, Harris C, Goldman D (2001) Does a reduced sensitivity to bitter taste increase the risk of becoming nicotine addicted? Addict Behav 26:399–404

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher ME, Cruickshanks KJ, Schubert CR et al (2013) Taste intensity in the Beaver Dam Offspring study. Laryngoscope 123:1399–1404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frye CA, Demolar GL (1994) Menstrual cycle and sex differences influence salt preference. Physiol Behav 55:193–197

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gemousakakis T, Kotini A, Anninos P et al (2011) MEG evaluation of taste by gender difference. J Integr Neurosci 10:537–545

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grant R, Ferguson MM, Strang R et al (1987) Evoked taste thresholds in a normal population and the application of electrogustometry to trigeminal nerve disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 50:12–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gudziol H, Hummel T (2007) Normative values for the assessment of gustatory function using liquid tastants. Acta Otolaryngol 127:658–661

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guo SW, Reed DR (2001) The genetics of phenylthiocarbamide perception. Ann Human Biol 28:111–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall NJ, Bartoshuk LM, Cain WS et al (1975) PTC blindness and the taste of caffeine. Nature 253:442–443

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen JL, Reed DR, Wright MJ et al (2006) Heritability and genetic covariation of sensitivity to PROP, SOA, quinine HCl, and caffeine. Chem Senses 31:403–413

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hyde RJ, Feller RP (1981) Age and sex effects on taste of sucrose, NaCl, citric acid and caffeine. Neurobiol Aging 2:315–318

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keast RS, Roper J (2007) A complex relationship among chemical concentration, detection threshold, and suprathreshold intensity of bitter compounds. Chem Senses 32:245–253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Konstantinidis I, Chatziavramidis A, Pintz A et al (2010) Effects of smoking on taste: assessment with contact endoscopy and taste strips. Laryngoscope 120:1958–1963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krut LH, Perrin MJ, Bronte-Stewart B (1961) Taste perception in smokers and non-smokers. Br Med J 1(5223):384–387

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mangold GE, Payne TJ, Ma JZ et al (2008) Bitter taste receptor gene polymorphisms are an important factor in the development of nicotine dependence in African Americans. J Med Genet 45:578–582

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meyerhof W, Batram C, Kuhn C et al (2010) The molecular receptive ranges of human TAS2R bitter taste receptors. Chem Senses 35:157–170

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mojet J, Heidema J, Christ-Hazelhof E (2003) Taste perception with age: generic or specific losses in supra-threshold intensities of five taste qualities? Chem Senses 28:397–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morabia A, Curtin F, Berstein MS (1999) Effects of smoking and smoking cessation on dietary habits of a Swiss urban population. Eur J Clin Nutr 53:239–243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlos P, Vasilios N, Antonia A et al (2009) Evaluation of young smokers and non-smokers with electrogustometry and contact endoscopy. BMC Ear Nose Throat Dis 9:9. doi:10.1186/1472-6815-9-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose JE (2006) Nicotine and nonnicotine factors in cigarette addiction. Psychopharmacology 184:274–285

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sato K, Endo S, Tomita H (2002) Sensitivity of three loci on the tongue and soft palate to four basic tastes in smokers and non-smokers. Acta Otolaryngol 546:74–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson EE, Rae G, Parr H et al (2012) Predictors of taste acuity in healthy older Europeans. Appetite 58:188–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor SM, Pomerleau CS, Mehringer AM et al (2006) Differences in smoking-related variables based on phenylthiocarbamide “taster” status. Addict Behav 31:2309–2312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venneman MM, Hummel T, Berger K (2008) The association between smoking and smell and taste impairment in the general population. J Neurol 255:1121–1126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamauchi Y, Endo S, Yoshimura I (2002) A new whole-mouth gustatory test procedure. I. Thresholds and principal components analysis in healthy men and women. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 546:39–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Compliance with Ethics Requirements

Conflict of Interest

Nelly Jacob declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Jean-Louis Golmard declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ivan Berlin declares that he has no conflict of interest.

ᅟ

Data, collected anonymously, came from a public health sensitisation procedure on "World No Tobacco Day". According to the French law on Biomedical research, no informed consent and agreement of the hospital's Ethics Committee (Institutional Review Board) were required.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Service de Pharmacologie, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, APHP, 75013, Paris, France

    Nelly Jacob & Ivan Berlin

  2. Département de Biostatistique, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, APHP, 75013, Paris, France

    Jean-Louis Golmard

  3. Service de Pharmacologie, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47-83, Boulevard de l’Hôpital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France

    Nelly Jacob

Authors
  1. Nelly Jacob
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jean-Louis Golmard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ivan Berlin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nelly Jacob.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jacob, N., Golmard, JL. & Berlin, I. Differential Perception of Caffeine Bitter Taste Depending on Smoking Status. Chem. Percept. 7, 47–55 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12078-014-9164-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12078-014-9164-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation