Skip to main content
Log in

The Relationship Between Psychopathy and Olfactory Tasks Sensitive to Orbitofrontal Cortex Function in a Non-criminal Student Sample

  • Published:
Chemosensory Perception

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between psychopathy and tests presumed sensitive to orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) function in a non-criminal student sample. While converging lines of evidence indicate OFC-associated dysfunction in criminal psychopaths, few studies have investigated whether non-criminal psychopaths manifest similar deficits. Psychopathic traits were indexed using the Self-Report Psychopathy scale and the “Sniffin' Sticks” and Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) were employed as neuropsychological measures of OFC function. The results showed higher degrees of psychopathy were significantly associated with poorer olfactory discriminative ability and poorer IGT performance. The discussion focuses on what these findings contribute to the understanding of the psychopathy and OFC relationship, suggesting the degree of OFC-associated dysfunction may be one differentiating factor between criminal and non-criminal psychopaths.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acheson SK (2005) Review of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist—Revised. In Spies RA, Plake BS (Eds) The Sixteenth Mental Measurements Yearbook, 2nd ed. Buros Institute of Mental Measurements Lincoln, pp. 429–431

  • Bechara A, Damasio AR, Damasio H, Anderson SW (1994) Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition 50:7–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Birbaumer N, Veit R, Lotze M, Erb M, Hermann C, Grodd W, Flor H (2005) Deficient fear conditioning in psychopathy: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Arch Gen Psychiatr 62(7):799–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair RJR (2004) The roles of orbital frontal cortex in the modulation of antisocial behaviour. Brain Cogn 55:198–208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blair RJR (2006) Subcortical brain systems in psychopathy: the amygdala and associated structures. In: Patrick CJ (ed) Handbook of psychopathy. Guilford, New York, pp 459–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair RJR, Mitchell DGV, Richell RA, Kelly S, Leonard A, Newman C, Scott SK (2002) Turning a deaf ear to fear: impaired recognition of vocal affect in psychopathic individuals. J Abnorm Psychol 111(4):682–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair KS, Newman C, Mitchell DGV, Richell RA, Leonard A, Morton J, Blair RJR (2006) Differentiating among prefrontal substrates in psychopathy: neuropsychological test findings. Neuropsychology 20(2):153–165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Borod JC (1992) Interhemipsheric and intrahemispheric control of emotion: a focus on unilateral brain damage. J Consult Clin Psychol 60:339–348

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cain WS, Gent JF, Goodspeed RB, Leonard G (1988) Evaluation of olfactory dysfunction in the Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center (CCCRC). Laryngoscope 98:83–88

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clark LA (2007) Assessment and diagnosis of personality disorder: perennial issues and an emerging reconceptualization. Annu Rev Psychol 58:227–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke DJ, Michie C, Hart SD, Clark DA (2004) Reconstructing psychopathy: clarifying the significance of antisocial and socially deviant behavior in the diagnosis of psychopathic personality disorder. J Pers Disord 18:337–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dade LA, Zatorre RJ, Jones–Gotman M (2002) Olfactory learning convergent findings from lesion and brain imaging studies. Brain 125:86–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damasio AR (1994) Descartes' error: emotion, reason, and the human brain. Avon, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • De Araujo I, Rolls ET, Velazco M, Margot C, Cayeux I (2005) Cognitive modulation of olfactory processing. Neuron 46:671–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doty RL, Shaman P, Dann M (1984) Development of the university of Pennsylvania smell identification test: a standardized microencapsulated test of olfactory function. Physiol Behav 32(3):489–502

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doty RL, Marcus A, Lee WW (1996) Development of the 12-item cross-cultural smell identification test (CC-SIT). Laryngoscope 106:353–356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gorenstein EE (1982) Frontal lobe functions in psychopaths. J Abnorm Psychol 95:368–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfriend JA, O'Doherty J, Dolan RJ (2002) Appetitive and aversive olfactory learning in humans studied using event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosci 22(24):10829–10837

    Google Scholar 

  • Goudriaan AE, Oosterlaan J, de Beurs E, van den Brink W (2006) Psychophysiological determinants and concomitants of deficient decision making in pathological gamblers. Drug Alcohol Depend 84(3):231–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall JR, Benning SD (2006) The “successful” psychopath: adaptive and subclinical manifestations of psychopath in the general population. In: Patrick CJ (ed) Handbook of psychopathy. Guilford, New York, pp 459–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare RD (1991) The Hare psychopathy checklist–revised. Multi–Health Systems, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare RD (1998) Psychopathy, affect, and behavior. In: Cooke DJ, Forth AR, Hare RD (eds) Psychopathy: theory, research, and implications for society. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 105–138

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hare RD (2003) The Hare psychopathy checklist—revised 2nd edition. Multi-Health Systems, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare RD, Neumann CS (2008) Psychopathy as a clinical and empirical construct. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 4:217–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hare RD, Neumann CS (2010) The role of antisociality in the psychopathy construct: comment on Skeem and Cooke (2010). Psychol Assess 22:446–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harpur TJ, Hare RD, Hakistian AR (1989) Two-factor conceptualization of psychopathy: construct validity and assessment implications. J Consult Clin Psychol 1:6–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris GT, Rice ME, Quinsey VL (1994) Psychopathy as a taxon: evidence that psychopaths are a discreet class. J Consult Clin Psychol 62:387–397

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hummel T, Sekinger B, Wolf SR, Pauli E, Kobal G (1997) ‘Sniffin' Sticks’: olfactory performance assessed by the combined testing of odor identification, odor discrimination and olfactory threshold. Chem Senses 22:39–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hummel T, Kobal G, Gudziol H, Mackay-Sim A (2007) Normative data for the Sniffin' Sticks including test of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds: an upgrade based on a group of more than 3,000 subjects. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 264:237–243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ishikawa SS, Raine A, Lencz T, Bihrle S, Lacasse L (2001) Autonomic stress reactivity and executive functions in successful and unsuccessful criminal psychopaths from the community. J Abnorm Psychol 110(3):423–432

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kennealy PJ, Hicks BM, Patrick CJ (2007) Validity of the psychopathy checklist—revised with female offenders. Assessment 14:323–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaPierre D, Braun CMJ, Hodgins S (1995) Ventral frontal deficits in psychopathy: neuropsychological test findings. Neuropsychologia 33(2):139–151

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lidberg L, Levander SE, Schalling D, Lidberg Y (1978) Necker cube reversals, arousal and psychopathy. Brit J Soc Clin Psychol 17(4):355–361

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lösel F, Schmucker M (2004) Psychopathy, risk-taking and attention: a differentiated test of the somatic marker hypothesis. J Abnorm Psychol 113(4):522–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmut MK, Stevenson RJ (2012) Olfactory abilities and psychopathy: higher psychopathy scores are associated with poorer odor discrimination and identification. Chemosens Percept 5:300–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmut MK, Homewood J, Stevenson RJ (2008) The characteristics of non-criminals with high psychopathy traits: are they similar to criminal psychopaths? J Res Pers 42:679–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmut MK, Menictas C, Stevenson RJ, Homewood J (2011) Validating the factor structure of the self-report psychopathy scale in a community sample. Psychol Assess 23(3):670–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian A, Epstein N (1972) A measure of emotional empathy. J Pers 40:525–543

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meloy JR (1988) The psychopathic mind. Jason Aronson, Northvale

    Google Scholar 

  • Miranda R, Mackillop J, Meyerson LA, Justus A, Lovallo WR (2009) Influence of antisocial and psychopathic traits on decision-making biases in alcoholics. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 33:817–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell DGV, Colledge E, Leonard A, Blair RJR (2002) Risky decisions and response reversal: is there evidence of orbitofrontal cortex dysfunction in psychopathic individuals? Neuropsychologia 40(12):2013–2022

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell DGV, Fine C, Richell RA, Newman C, Lumsden J, Blair KS, Blair RJR (2006) Instrumental learning and relearning in individuals with psychopathy and in patients with lesions involving the amygdala or orbitofrontal cortex. Neuropsychology 20(3):280–289

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan AB, Lilienfeld SO (2000) A meta-analytic review of the relation between antisocial behaviour and neuropsychological measures of executive function. Clin Psychol Rev 20:113–136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mullins–Sweatt SN, Glover NG, Derefinko KJ, Miller JD, Widiger TA (2010) The search for the successful psychopath. J Res Pers 44:554–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson HE, Willison JR (1991) The Revised National Adult Reading Test—test manual. NFER-Nelson, Windsor

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollatos O, Albrecht J, Kopietz R, Linn J, Schoepf V, Kleemann AM, Schreder T et al (2007) Reduced olfactory sensitivity in subjects with depressive symptoms. J Affect Disord 102(1–3):101–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raine A (2008) From genes to brain to antisocial behaviour. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 17(5):323–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers RD (2006) The functional architecture of the frontal lobes: implications for research with psychopathic offenders. In: Patrick CJ (ed) Handbook of psychopathy. Guilford, New York, pp 313–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolls ET (2000) The orbitofrontal cortex and reward. Cereb Cortex 10:284–294

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roussy S, Toupin J (2000) Behavioral inhibition deficits in juvenile psychopaths. Aggress Behav 26:413–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royet JP, Hudry J, Zald DH, Godinot D, Gregoire MC, Lavenne F, Costes N, Holley A (2001) Functional neuroanatomy of different olfactory judgments. Neuroimage 13:506–519

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rupp CI, Fleischhacker WW, Hausmann A, Mair D, Hinterhuber H, Kurz M (2004) Olfactory functioning in patients with alcohol dependence: impairments in odor judgments. Alcohol Alcohol 39(6):514–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samter W, Burleson BR (1984) Cognitive and motivational influences on spontaneous comforting behavior. Hum Commun Res 11:231–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt WA, Brinkley CA, Newman JP (1999) Testing Damasio's somatic marker hypothesis with psychopathy individuals: risk takers or risk averse? J Abnorm Psychol 108(3):538–543

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seubert J, Freiherr J, Frasnelli J, Hummel T, Lundstrom JN (2012) Orbitofrontal cortex and olfactory bulb volume predict distinct aspects of olfactory performance in healthy subjects. Cereb Cortex. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhs230, Epub ahead of print

    Google Scholar 

  • Skeem JL, Cooke DJ (2010a) Is criminal behaviour a central component of psychopathy? Conceptual directions for resolving the debate. Psychol Assess 22(2):433–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skeem JL, Cooke DJ (2010b) One measure does not a construct make: directions toward reinvigorating psychopathy research—reply to Hare and Neumann (2010). Psychol Assess 22:455–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spinella M (2002) A relationship between smell identification and empathy. Int J Neurosci 112:605–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widom CS (1977) A methodology for studying noninstitutionalized psychopaths. J Consult Clin Psychol 45(4):674–683

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams KM, Paulhus DL, Hare RD (2007) Capturing the four-factor structure of psychopathy in college students via self-report. J Pers Assess 88(2):205–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson D, Stevenson RJ (2006) Learning to smell. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong S (1988) Is Hares' psychopath checklist reliable without the interview? Psychol Rep 62:931–934

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Compliance with Ethics Requirements

Conflict of Interest

Travis M. Bettison declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Mehmet K. Mahmut declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Richard J. Stevenson declares that he has no conflict of interest.

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008 (5). Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehmet K. Mahmut.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bettison, T.M., Mahmut, M.K. & Stevenson, R.J. The Relationship Between Psychopathy and Olfactory Tasks Sensitive to Orbitofrontal Cortex Function in a Non-criminal Student Sample. Chem. Percept. 6, 198–210 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12078-013-9157-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12078-013-9157-9

Keywords

Navigation