Skip to main content
Log in

Non-hypervascular hypointense nodules on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI as a predictor of outcomes for early-stage HCC

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hepatology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background/purpose

In patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) often identifies non-hypervascular hypointense hepatic nodules during the hepatobiliary phase, but their prognostic significance is unclear. We conducted a prospective observational study to investigate the impact of non-hypervascular hypointense hepatic nodules detected by Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI on the outcome of patients with early-stage HCC.

Methods

Post-treatment recurrence and survival rates were analyzed in 138 patients with non-recurrent, early-stage HCC [Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage 0 or A] and Child-Pugh A liver function according to the presence of non-hypervascular hypointense nodules on pretreatment Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI.

Results

Non-hypervascular hypointense hepatic nodules were detected in 51 (37.0 %) patients with early-stage HCC on pretreatment Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI. Recurrence rates were significantly higher in patients with non-hypervascular hypointense nodules (p < 0.0001). Based on a multivariate analysis, the presence of non-hypervascular hypointense hepatic nodules on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI was independently associated with an increased recurrence rate, independent of tumor progression or treatment (p = 0.0005). The survival rate was significantly lower in patients with non-hypervascular hypointense nodules on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI (p = 0.0108).

Conclusions

In patients with early-stage typical HCC (BCLC 0 or A), the presence of concurrent non-hypervascular hypointense hepatic nodules in the hepatobiliary phase of pretreatment Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI is an indicator of higher likelihood of recurrence after treatment and may be a marker for unfavorable outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

Gd-EOB-DTPA:

Gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

HCC:

Hepatocellular carcinoma

US:

Ultrasonography

MDCT:

Multidetector-row computed tomography

BCLC:

Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer

AASLD:

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases

RFA:

Radiofrequency ablation

AFP:

Alpha-fetoprotein

AFP-L3:

Lens culinaris agglutinin-reactive alpha-fetoprotein

DCP:

Des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin

CTHA:

CT during hepatic arteriography

TACE:

Transarterial chemoembolization

ALT:

Alanine amonotransferase activity

References

  1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2011;61:69–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hamm B, Staks T, Muhler A, Bollow M, Taupitz M, Frenzel T, et al. Phase I clinical evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA as a hepatobiliary MR contrast agent: safety, pharmacokinetics, and MR imaging. Radiology 1995;195:785–792

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vogl TJ, Kummel S, Hammerstingl R, Schellenbeck M, Schumacher G, Balzer T, et al. Liver tumors: comparison of MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA. Radiology 1996;200:59–67

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim SH, Kim SH, Lee J, Kim MJ, Jeon YH, Park Y, et al. Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI versus triple-phase MDCT for the preoperative detection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Roentgenol 2009;192:1675–1681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Van Beers BE, Pastor CM, Hussain HK. Primovist, Eovist: what to expect? J Hepatol 2012;57:421–429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Reimer P, Rummeny EJ, Shamsi K, Balzer T, Daldrup HE, Tombach B, et al. Phase II clinical evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA: dose, safety aspects, and pulse sequence. Radiology 1996;199:177–183

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pugh RNH, Murray-Lyon IM, Dawson JL, Pietroni MC, Williams R. Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices. Br J Surg 1973;60:646–649

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Forner A, Reig ME, de Lope CR, Bruix J. Current strategy for staging and treatment: the BCLC update and future prospects. Semin Liver Dis 2010;30:61–74

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bruix J, Sherman M. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 2005;42:1208–1236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bruix J, Sherman M. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update. Hepatology 2011;53:1020–1022

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kokudo N, Makuuchi M. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for hepatocellular carcinoma in Japan: J-HCC guidelines. J Gastroenterol 2009;44:S119–S121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan. Intrahepatic Metastasis and Multicentric Occurrence. General Rules for the Clinical and Pathological Study of Primary Liver Cancer. 3rd ed. Tokyo: Kanehara & Co. Ltd; 2011, pp 54–55

  13. Kumada T, Nakano S, Takeda I, Sugiyama K, Osada T, Kiriyama S, et al. Patterns of recurrence after initial treatment in patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 1997;25:87–92

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tsuda H, Hirohashi S, Shimosato Y, Terada M, Hasegawa H. Clonal origin of atypical adenomatous hyperplasia of the liver and clonal identify with hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology 1988;95:1664–1666

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Takenaka K, Adachi E, Nishizaki T, Hiroshige K, Ikeda T, Tsuneyoshi M, et al. Possible multicentric occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma: a clinicopathological study. Hepatology 1994;19:889–894

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Frericks BB, Loddenkemper C, Huppertz A, Valdeig S, Stroux A, Seja M, et al. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma and cirrhotic liver enhancement using Gd-EOB-DTPA. Am J Roentgenol 2009;193:1053–1060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Matsui O, Kadoya M, Kameyama T, Yoshikawa J, Takashima T, Nakanuma Y, et al. Benign and malignant nodules in cirrhotic livers: distinction based on blood supply. Radiology 1991;178:493–497

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Takayasu K, Muramatsu Y, Furukawa H, Wakao F, Moriyama N, Takayama T, et al. Early hepatocellular carcinoma: appearance at CT during arterial portography and CT arteriography with pathologic correlation. Radiology 1995;194:101–105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hayashi M, Matsui O, Ueda K, Kawamori Y, Gabata T, Kadoya M. Progression to hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation with intranodular blood supply evaluated with CT during intraarterial injection of contrast material. Radiology 2002;225:143–149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kagebayashi C, Yamaguchi I, Akinaga A, Kitano H, Yokoyama K, Satomura M, et al. Automated immunoassay system for AFP-L3% using on-chip electrokinetic reaction and separation by affinity electrophoresis. Anal Biochem 2009;388:306–311

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mita Y, Aoyagi Y, Yanagi M, Suda T, Suzuki Y, Asakura H. The usefulness of determining des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin by sensitive enzyme immunoassay in the early diagnosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer 1998;82:1643–1648

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Okuda H, Nakanishi T, Takatsu K, Saito A, Hayashi N, Watanabe K, et al. Measurement of serum levels of des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma by a revised enzyme immunoassay kit with increased sensitivity. Cancer 1999;85:812–818

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nomura F, Ishijima M, Kuwa K, Tanaka N, Nakai T, Ohnishi K. Serum des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin levels determined by a new generation of sensitive immunoassays in patients with small-sized hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:650–654

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Oka H, Tamori A, Kuroki T, Kobayashi K, Yamamoto S. Prospective study of alpha-fetoprotein in cirrhotic patients monitored for development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 1994;19:61–66

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Koda M, Murawaki Y, Mitsuda A, Ohyama K, Horie Y, Suou T, et al. Predictive factors for intrahepatic recurrence after percutaneous ethanol injection therapy for small hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer 2000;88:529–537

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Okuda H, Nakanishi T, Takatsu K, Saito A, Hayashi N, Takasaki K, et al. Serum levels of des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin measured using the revised enzyme immunoassay kit with increased sensitivity in relation to clinicopathological features of solitary hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer 2000;88:544–549

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Non parametric estimation for incomplete observation. J Am Stat Assoc 1958;53:457–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Petro R, Pike MC. Conservation of the approximation (0-E2)/E in the log rank test for survival data on tumor incidence data. Biometrics 1973;29:579–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Cox D. Regression models and life tables. J R Stat Soc 1972;34:187–220

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kitamoto M, Imagawa M, Yamada H, Watanabe C, Sumioka M, Satoh O, et al. Radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinomas: comparison of the radiofrequency effect with and without chemoembolization. Am J Roentogenol 2003;181:997–1003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Granito A, Galassi M, Piscaglia F, Romanini L, Lucidi V, Renzulli M, et al. Impact of gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced magnetic resonance on the non-invasive diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective study. Aliment Phamacol Ther 2013;37:355–363

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Toyoda H, Kumada T, Tada T, Niinomi T, Ito T, Sone Y, et al. Non-hypervascular hypointense nodules detected by Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI are a risk factor for recurrence of HCC after hepatectomy. J Hepatol 2013;58:1174–1180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kumada T, Toyoda H, Tada T, Sone Y, Fujimori M, Ogawa S, et al. Evolution of hypointense hepatocellular nodules observed only in the hepatobiliary phase of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI. Am J Roentogenol 2011;197:58–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kim YK, Lee WJ, Park MJ, Kim SH, Rhim H, Choi D. Hypovascular hypointense nodules on hepatobiliary phase gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR images in patients with cirrhosis: potential of DW imaging in predicting progression to hypervascular HCC. Radiology 2012;265:104–114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Golfieri R, Renzulli M, Lucidi V, Corcioni B, Trevisani F, Bolondi L. Contribution of the hepatobiliary phase of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI to dynamic MRI in the detection of hypovascular (≤2 cm) HCC in cirrhosis. Eur Radiol 2011;21:1233–1242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kogita S, Imai Y, Okada M, Kim T, Onishi H, Takamura M, et al. Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance images of hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation with histological grading and portal blood flow. Eur Radiol 2010;20:2405–2413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Akai H, Matsuda I, Kiryu S, Tajima T, Takao H, Watanabe Y, et al. Fate of hypointense lesions on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:2973–2977

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kobayashi S, Matsui O, Gabata T, Koda W, Minami T, Ryu Y, et al. Relationship between signal intensity on hepatobiliary phase of gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced MR imaging and prognosis of borderline lesions of hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:3002–3009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Compliance with ethical requirements and Conflict of interest

The entire protocol was approved by the hospital institutional review board and carried out in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all participating patients before the enrollment of the study. Hidenori Toyoda, Takashi Kumada, Toshifumi Tada, Yasuhiro Sone, Atsuyuki Maeda, and Yuji Kaneoka declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hidenori Toyoda.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 42 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Toyoda, H., Kumada, T., Tada, T. et al. Non-hypervascular hypointense nodules on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI as a predictor of outcomes for early-stage HCC. Hepatol Int 9, 84–92 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-014-9553-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-014-9553-5

Keywords

Navigation