Skip to main content
Log in

Investigation of energy saving potentials in T-junction and elbow in compressed air systems

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Energy Efficiency Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent times, the applications of numerical methods are gaining momentum to carry out critical analysis to identify electrical energy and related emission saving potential on real-time application. The chosen specific area of the current work is the simulation of compressed airflow through pipes. The pressure gradient across compressed air pipe junction was simulated, and the result showed that the minimum pressure drop occurs when a branch line is taken at an angle of 46° with horizontal from the main pipe against the conventional T branch. In case of elbow, 150-mm fillet radius gave minimum pressure drop against 90° elbow. The CFD analysis carried out on T and elbow of compressed air pipe network with various inlet air pressures of 4 × 105, 6 × 105, and 8 × 105 Pa showed that a no. of redesigned junction geometry, which is 5000, can reduce compressor electricity consumption by 127.14 MWh per annum and CO2 emission by 37.31 t per annum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

C ε1, C ε2 :

Standard k-ε model constants

Dy:

No. of days for the year

E R :

Energy recovered (MWh)

ES i :

Energy source i (electricity or fuel wood/Briquette)

EF i :

Emission factor for the fuel type (i)

H :

Operating hour

INR:

Indian Rupees

N θ :

Adiabatic power (kW) at angle θ and is replaced with fillet radius (r) in case of elbows

n :

No. of junctions

Na:

Adiabatic power required (MWh)

p 1 and p 2 :

Initial and final pressure in pascal (absolute)

Q :

Flow rate (m3/h)

r :

Fillet radius

γ :

Compression index, 1.4

k :

Turbulent kinetic energy (m2/s2)

μ :

Dynamic viscosity (kg/ms)

μ t :

Turbulent viscosity (kg/ms)

σ k :

Turbulent Prandtl number for k

σ ε :

Turbulent Prandtl number for ε

ε :

Turbulent dissipation per unit mass

ρ :

Mass density (kg/m3)

k :

Kinetic energy of turbulent fluctuations

References

  • Abdulwahhab, M., Injeti, N. K., & Dakhil, S. F. (2012). CFD simulations and flow analysis through a t-junction pipe. International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 4, 3392–3407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Central Electricity Authority, G. O. I. (2009). Green house gas emission guidelines for stationary combustion sources. North Carolina Division of Air Quality, www.ncair.org.

  • Costa, N. P., Maia, R., Pinho, F. T., & Proença, M. F. (2006). Edge effects on the flow characteristics in a 90° tee junction.

  • Dindorf, R. (2012). Estimating potential energy saving in compressed air system. Procedia Engineering, 39, 204–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eesa, M. (2009). CFD studies of complex fluid flows in pipes. Ph.D, Birmingham.

  • Gaylard, A. (2001). In: Computational fluid dynamics in practice. Professional Engineering Publishing.

  • Gielen, D., & Taylor, P. (2009). Indicators for industrial energy efficiency in India. Energy, 34, 962–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilherme, C. G., Martin, N. R., & Cristina, S. H. (2012). Thermal and air flow simulation of a naturally ventilated shopping mall. International Journal of Energy and Building, 50, 177–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • György, P., Pinho, F. T., & Maia, R. (2003). Numerical predictions of turbulent flow in a 90° tee junction. The 12th International Conference on Fluid Flow Technologies. Budapest, Hungary.

  • György, P., Pinho, F. T., & Maia, R. 2006. The effect of corner radius on the energy loss in 90° T-junction turbulent flows. The 13th International Conference on Fluid Flow Technologies. Budapest, Hungary.

  • Holdsworth, J. (1997). Conserving energy in compressed air systems. Plant Engineering, 51, 103–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, B. (2004). Compressed air supply efficiency. Houston: IETC Conference: Southern California Edison, USA.

  • Kolmogorov, A. N. (1942) Equations of turbulent motion in an incompressible fluid. Izvestiya Akademii Nauk, Seriya Fizicheskaya 6, 56–58.

  • Mathur, J., Bansal, N. K., & Wagner, H. J. (2003). Investigation of greenhouse gas reduction potential and change in technological selection in Indian power sector. Energy Policy, 31, 1235–1244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mongia, N., Sathaye, J., & Mongia, P. (1994). Energy use and carbon implications in India focus on industry. Energy Policy, 22, 894–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mongia, P., Schumacher, K., & Sathaye, J. (2001). Policy reforms and productivity growth in India's energy intensive industries. Energy Policy, 29, 715–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikola, T., Goran, J., & Hakon, S. (2011). Cfd analysis and air flow measurements to approach large industrial halls energy efficiency: a case study of a cardboard mill hall. International Journal of Energy and Building, 43, 1200–1206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paritosh, R., V. (2007). Fluid flow in T-junction of pipes. Master, Department of Information Technology, Laboratory of Applied Mathematics.

  • Radgen, P. (2004). Compressed air system audits and benchmarking. 3rd European Congress Economics and Management of Energy in Industry, Estoril-Lisbon. Portugal.

  • Radgen, P. 2006. Efficiency through compressed air energy audits. Energy Audit Conference.

  • Radgen, P. & Blaustein, E. (2001). Compressed air systems in the European Union – energy, emissions, saving potentials and policy actions. Stuttgart, Germany.

  • Saidur, R. (2010). A review on electrical motors energy use and energy savings. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14, 877–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sathaye, J., & Phadke, A. (2006). Cost of electric power sector carbon mitigation in India: international implications. Energy Policy, 34, 1619–1629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seddon, J. (1957). The flow through short straight pipes in a compressible viscous stream. London: Aeronautical Research Council by Ministry of Supply.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terrell, R., E. 1999. Improving compressed air system efficiency. Know what you really need. Energy Engineering, 96, 7–15

  • Victoria, S. (2009). Energy efficiency, best practice guide, compressed air systems.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. A. Madlool.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 599 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sambandam, M.T., Madlool, N.A., Saidur, R. et al. Investigation of energy saving potentials in T-junction and elbow in compressed air systems. Energy Efficiency 10, 1099–1113 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-016-9493-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-016-9493-0

Keywords

Navigation