Abstract
This paper presents the results of an investigation carried out on Ultra High Strength Concrete (UHSC) panels subjected to low velocity projectile impact to assess impact resistance. UHSC panel of size 350 × 350 mm and thickness 15 mm is studied under drop weight impact loading for three different pre-determined drop heights ranging from 100 mm to 300 mm. The response of UHSC panel in terms of acceleration vs time is obtained experimentally. Numerical model has been developed to simulate the impact behaviour of UHSC panel. The Brittle cracking model is used to simulate the behaviour of UHSC panel under impact loading and to perform parametric studies by varying the volume fraction of steel fibres.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbas H, Gupta N K and Alam M 2004 Nonlinear response of concrete beams and plates under impact loading. Int. J. Impact Eng. 30: 1039–1053
Elavenil S and Samuel Knight G M 2012 Impact response of plates under drop weight impact testing. Daffodil International University. J. Sci. Technol. 7(1): 1–11
Farnam Y,Mohammadi S and ShekarchiM2010 Experimental and numerical investigations of low velocity impact behaviour of high performance fibre reinforced cement based composite. Int. J. Impact Eng. 37: 220–229
Gayarre F L, Albert Domingo, Carlos Lazaro, Caelos Lopez Colina and Maria Pelufo 2009 Model for the behaviour of steel fibre reinforced concrete in plate elements. Proceedings of the International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures, Spain, 2965–2980
Georgin J F and Reynouard J M 2003 Modeling of structures subjected to impact:concrete behaviour under high strain rate. Cem. Concr. Compos. 25: 131–143
Ghouse M D, Lakshmana Rao C and Rao B N 2011 Numerical modelling of failure of cement concrete using a unit cell approach. Sadhana 36(1): 35–51
Gopinath S, Madeswaran S, Rama Chandra Murthy A, Barkavi T and Nagesh R Iyer 2012 Drop weight impact analysis of fabric reinforced concrete. SERC Research Report No. CSD-MLP134-RR-01
Habel K and Gaurvreau P D 2006 Static and impact behaviour of concrete members rehabilitated with UHPFRC overlay. 2 nd International Symposium on Advances in Concrete through Science and Engineering, 11-13, September, Quebec City, Canada
Jiang P J and Mirza F A 1988 An Elasto-plastic constitutive model for concrete. Int. J. Solids Struct. 24(7): 705–722 208
Oliver Martin 2010 Comparison of different constitutive models for concrete in ABAQUS/explicit for missile impact analyses. JRC Scientific and Technical Reports
Ong K C G, Basheerkhan M and Paramasivam P 1999 Resistance of fibre concrete slabs to low velocity projectile impact. Cem. Concr. Compos. 21: 391–401
Prem P P, Bharathkumar B H and Nagesh R Iyer 2012 Mechanical properties of ultra high performance concrete. World academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, Issue 68, August 2012, Malaysia, 1969–1978
Wang Z L, Shi J M and Wang J G 2011 On the strength and toughness properties of SFRC under static dynamic compression. Compos. Part B 42: 1285–1290 217
Xu H, Mindess S and Joseph I D 2004 Performance of plain and fibre reinforced concrete panels subjected to low velocity impact loading. 6 th RILEM Symposium on Fiber-Reinforced Concretes (FRC) – BEFIB, 20-22, September, Varenna, Italy
Zhang X X, Ruiz G and Yu R C 2010 A New drop-weight impact machine for studying fracture processes in structural concrete. Strain An Int. J. Experimental Mech. 46: 252–257
Zineddin M and Krauthammer T 2007 Dynamic response and behavior of reinforced concrete slabs under impact loading. Int. J. Impact Eng. 34: 1517–1534
Acknowledgements
Authors thank the staff of Computational Structural Mechanics Group and Advanced Materials Laboratory, CSIR-SERC for support during the investigations. This paper is being published with the kind permission of the Director, CSIR-SERC.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
GOPINATH, S., AYASHWARYA, R., KUMAR, V.R. et al. Low velocity impact behaviour of ultra high strength concrete panels. Sadhana 39, 1497–1507 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-014-0280-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-014-0280-3