Abstract
An E-glass-reinforced epoxy-based nanocomposite containing organomodified nanoclay (15–20 nm) and calcium silicate particles (75–149 μm) was developed through mechanical shearing mixing and hand layup techniques. Three weight fractions (2, 3 and 4%) of nanoclay were selected to study the effects of nanoclay on mechanical and wear behaviour of nanocomposites. Tensile and flexural properties of nanocomposites were evaluated and compared. The wear properties were evaluated for three speed (3.14, 4.19 and 5.24 m s−1) and load (20, 50, and 80 N) conditions based on a design of experiment (L16 matrix) concept. The wear loss results were statistically analysed to study the significance of load, speed and nanoclay content. The morphologies of wear surface and fracture surface were examined with the aid of a scanning electron microscope (SEM) to identify the wear and fracture mechanisms. It was found that the wear loss increases with increasing nanoclay amount due to the particle agglomeration effects. Statistical analysis determines that the load is the most significant parameter affecting the wear resistance of nanocomposites. The mean and S/N ratio analyses rank the parameters significance in affecting wear resistance as follows: load > nanoclay content > speed. The wear mechanisms of nanocomposites are complex due to the observation of multiple features such as fibre thinning, matrix wear and fibre/matrix debonding as against abrasive wear in the pure epoxy. Tensile and flexural test results show that a good dispersion of nanoclay is achieved with 2 wt% amount in epoxy-based nanocomposites. The mechanical properties degrade above 2 wt% due to the excessive reinforcement, uneven distribution and the particle agglomeration effects. Fractography studies of tension-failed samples show that pure epoxy resin fails by multimode gauge explosive mode, whereas nanocomposites fail mainly by the matrix/fibre interface failure and fibre breakages.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Sampathkumaran P, Seetharamu S, Murali A, Kumar R K and Kishore 1998 Bull. Mater. Sci. 21 335
Naeimirad M, Zadhoush A and Neisiany R E 2016 J. Compos. Mater. 50 435
Prabhu T R, Varma V K and Vedantam S 2014 Wear 309 247
Hussain F, Hojjati M, Okamoto M and Gorga R E 2006 J. Compos. Mater. 40 1511
Barbezat M, Brunner A J, Necola A, Rees M, Gasser Ph and Terrasi G 2009 J. Compos. Mater. 43 9
Zhang Z, Breidt C, Chang L, Haupert F and Friedrich K 2004 Composites Part A 35 1385
Singh R P, Zhang M and Chan D 2002 J. Mater. Sci. 37 781
Wang K, Chen L, Wu J, Toh M L, He C and Yee A F 2005 Macromolecules 38 788
Jordan J, Jacob K I, Tannenbaum R, Sharaf M A and Jasiuk I 2005 Mater. Sci. Eng. A 393 1
Bashar M, Mertiny P and Sundararaj U 2014 J. Nanomater. 1 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/312813)
Utracki L A 2004 Clay-containg polymeric nanocomposites vol 2 (Shrewsbury, Shropshire, UK: Rapra Technology Limited)
Giannelis E P 1996 Adv. Mater. 8 29
Laine R M, Choi J and Lee I 2001 Adv. Mater. 13 800
Wetzel B, Haupert F, Friedrich K, Zhang M Q and Rong M Z 2002 Polym. Eng. Sci. 42 1919
Wetzel B, Haupert F and Zhang M Q 2003 Compos. Sci. Technol. 63 2055
Chang L and Zhang Z 2006 Wear 260 869
Zhang Z and Friedrich K 2005 In: K Friedrich, S Fakirovc and Z Zhang (eds) Polymer composites—from nano- to macro-scale (New York, NY 10013, USA: Springer) p 169
Zhang M Q, Rong M Z, Yu S L, Wetzel B and Friedrich K 2002 Wear 253 1086
Durand J M, Vardavoulias M and Jeandin M 1995 Wear 181 833
Chee C Y, Song N L, Abdullah L C, Choong T S Y, Ibrahim A and Chantara T R 2012 J. Nanomater. 2012 1
Zhang M Q, Rong M Z, Yu M L, Wetzel B and Friedrich K 2002 Macromol. Mater. Eng. 287 111
Ng C B, Schadler L S and Siegel R W 1999 Nanostruct. Mater. 12 507
Rong M Z, Zhang M Q, Liu H, Zeng H M, Wetzel B and Friedrich K 2001 Ind. Lubr. Tribol. 53 72
Shi G, Zhang M Q, Rong M Z, Wetzel B and Friedrich K 2004 Wear 256 1072
Petrovic Z S, Javni I, Waddon A and Banhegyi G 2000 J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 76 133
Prabhu T R 2015 Mater. Des. 77 149
Reynaud E, Jouen T, Gautheir C, Vigier G and Varlet J 2001 Polymer 42 8759
Haque A, Shamsuzzoha M, Hussain F and Dean D 2003 , J. Compos. Mater. 37 1821
Luo J J and Daniel I M 2003 Compos. Sci. Technol. 63 1607
Lan T and Pinnavaia T J 1994 Chem. Mater. 6 2216
Pinnavaia T J, Lan T, Wang Z, Shi H and Kaviratna P D 2009 ACS Symp. Ser. 622 250
Chan C M, Wu J, Li J X and Cheung Y K 2002 Polymer 43 2981
Rong M Z, Zhang M Q, Zheng Y X, Zeng H M, Walter R and Friedrich K 2001 Polymer 42 167
Nielsen L E and Landel R F 1993 Mechanical properties of polymers and composites, 2nd edn (New York: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group)
Roulin-Moloney A C 1989 Fractography and failure mechanisms of polymers and composites (Barking, England: Elsevier Applied Science)
Prabhu T R 2015 Bull. Mater. Sci. 38 753
Prabhu T R, Varma V K and Vedantam S 2014 Wear 317 201
Prabhu T R and Vedantam S 2015 Tribol. Trans. 58 718
Prabhu T R, Varma V K and Vedantam S 2014 J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 23 3666
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
PRABHU, T.R., BASAVARAJAPPA, S., SANTHOSH, R.B. et al. Tribological and mechanical behaviour of dual-particle (nanoclay and CaSiO3)-reinforced E-glass-reinforced epoxy nanocomposites. Bull Mater Sci 40, 107–116 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-016-1355-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-016-1355-z