Skip to main content
Log in

Intra-operative perforation: a risk factor for prognosis of low rectal cancer after abdominoperineal resection

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Medical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was designed to explore the influence of intra-operative perforation on prognosis of low rectal cancer after APR and to investigate the risk factors of perforation. Perforation is not scarce during the procedure of abdominoperineal resection (APR). There is no consensus on perforation rate and related risk factor for APR. Data of 925 patients who received APR for low rectal cancer between January 2000 and August 2008 were reviewed. The intra-operative perforation rate was 7.4 % (68/925). The recurrence rate was 28.6 % in patients with intra-operative perforation compared with 6.8 % in patients with no perforation (P < 0.001); 5-year survival rate in patients with perforation was 41.4 and 66.3 % in patients with no perforation. Univariate analysis showed that intra-operative perforation affected recurrence rate and survival significantly (P < 0.001, P < 0.001); multivariate analysis revealed that intra-operative perforation was an independent prognostic factors for recurrence (RR: 3.087, P < 0.001), while not for survival (RR: 1.331, P = 0.051). Patients aged more than 70 years, T3 tumor and treated by general surgeon had higher perforation rate (P = 0.001, P = 0.004, P = 0.008). Intra-operative perforation affected the prognosis of low rectal cancer after APR significantly. Elderly patient aged more than 70 years, T3 tumor and general surgeon who performed operation were three risk factors of increased perforation rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eriksen MT, Wibe A, Syse A, et al. Inadvertent perforation during rectal cancer resection in Norway. Br J Surg. 2004;91:210–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Marr R, Birbeck K, Garvican J, et al. The modern abdominoperineal excision: the next challenge after total mesorectal excision. Ann Surg. 2005;242:74–82.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bebenek M. Abdominosacral amputation of the rectum for low rectal cancers: ten years of experience. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:2211–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bülow S, Christensen IJ, Iversen LH, et al. Intra-operative perforation is an important predictor of local recurrence and impaired survival after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2011;13:1256–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kapiteijn E, Marijnen CAM, Nagtegaal ID, et al. Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:638–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD. The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery—the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg. 1982;69:613–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wibe A, Moller B, Norstein J, et al. A national strategic change in treatment policy for rectal cancer–implementation of total mesorectal excision as routine treatment in Norway: a national audit. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45:857–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wibe A, Syse A, Andersen E, et al. Oncological outcomes after total mesorectal excision for cure for cancer of the lower rectum: anterior versus abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:48–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bernstein TE, Endreseth BH, Romundstad P, et al. Circumferential resection margin as a prognostic factor in rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2009;96:1348–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yu HC, Peng H, He XS, Zhao RS. Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes after extralevator abdominoperineal excision and standard abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014;29:183–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. West NP, Anderin C, Smith KJ, et al. Multicentre experience with extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2010;97:588–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nagtegaal ID, Van de Velde CJH, Marijnen CAM, et al. Low rectal cancer: a call for a change of approach in abdominoperineal resection. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:9257–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jörgren F, Johansson R, Damber L, et al. Oncological outcome after incidental perforation in radical rectal cancer surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2010;25:731–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. West NP, Finan PJ, Anderin C, et al. Evidence of the oncologic superiority of cylindrical abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3517–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Umpleby HC, Fermor B, Symes MO, et al. Viability of exfoliated colorectal carcinoma cells. Br J Surg. 1984;71:659–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Skipper D, Cooper AJ, Marston JE, et al. Exfoliated cells and in vitro growth in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 1987;74:1049–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. How P, Shihab O, Tekkis P, et al. A systematic review of cancer related patient outcomes after anterior resection and abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer in the total mesorectal excision era. Surg Oncol. 2011;20:e149–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stelzner S, Koehler C, Stelzer J, et al. Extended abdominoperineal excision versus standard abdominoperineal excision in rectal cancer: a systematic overview. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011;26:1227–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mehta S. Inadvertent perforation during rectal cancer resection in Norway. Br J Surg. 2004; 91: 210–6, 779.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Nie Hong-xia, Zheng Wei, Tong Yao and Tan Wei for collecting and arranging data of patients. Their supports were the key factor in completing this paper.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jian-jun Bi or Zhi-xiang Zhou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Xm., Dai, Jl., Ma, Sh. et al. Intra-operative perforation: a risk factor for prognosis of low rectal cancer after abdominoperineal resection. Med Oncol 31, 964 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-014-0964-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-014-0964-x

Keywords

Navigation