Abstract
Background
Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the gall bladder (GB) are rare tumors classified as grade 1 and 2 neuroendocrine tumor (NET), neuroendocrine carcinoma (large cell or small cell type), and mixed adeno-neuroendocrine carcinoma (MANEC). Primary neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) of GB are rare with grave prognosis not withstanding radical surgical treatment. Chemotherapy forms the primary management due to the advanced stage at presentation, as complete surgical resection is generally not possible. The overall median survival is 4–6 months despite aggressive management. Only 73 cases of small cell carcinoma (SCC) and 10 cases of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) have been reported in English literature till now. We present a series of 19 cases of NEC of GB with their pathological and clinical features and response to treatment.
Objective
The objective of this study was to evaluate NECs of the GB for their clinical behavior, prognosis, and treatment outcome in terms of survival and to segregate NECs into further subcategories, that is 20–50 % and >50 %, based on MIB-1 index.
Methods
We retrospectively searched the clinical and pathological database over 2.5 years (January 2012 to June 2014) through existing electronic hospital medical records to collect cases of NEC arising in GB. A total of 447 cases of gall bladder pathologies were analyzed, of which 19 cases were diagnosed as NEC. All relevant investigations were documented and response to treatment/therapy was evaluated clinically and radiologically. Tumor specimen was obtained by fine-needle aspiration cytology and/or biopsy and classified using the latest World Health Organisation (WHO) classification (2010) via cytopathologic, histopathologic, and immunohistochemical visage.
Results
Nineteen patients diagnosed as NEC of GB were evaluated in the study, with 16 having SCC, 2 having LCNEC, and 1 with MANEC. All patients presented in advanced clinical stage III or IV, along with distant metastasis and showed progressive disease during therapy. Ki67 index was between 20 and 50 % in 5 cases and >50 % in 8 cases. Follow-up was available in 14 cases with a median survival of 3 months, and 2 of these patients capitulated to their illness, before commencement of treatment. The remaining 5 cases were lost to follow-up. Out of these, 2 had deranged liver function test and no chemotherapy could be administered, and the other 3 refused treatment.
Conclusions
NECs are aggressive with generally poor prognosis, characterized by insidious onset and advanced clinical stage of presentation. A radical approach to treatment with chemotherapy is the best form of palliation. Role of radiotherapy remains undefined due to paucity of data.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mezi S, Petrozza V, Schillaci O, La Torre V, Cimadon B, Leopizzi M, et al. Neuroendocrine tumors of the gallbladder: a case report and review of the literature. J Med Case Rep. 2011;5:334.
Eltawil KM, Gustafsson BI, Kidd M, Modlin IM. Neuroendocrine tumors of the gall bladder: an evaluation and reassessment of management strategy. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2010;44:687–95.
Komminoth P, Arnold R, Capella C, Klimstra DS, Kloppel G, Rindi G, et al. Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the gallbladder and extrahepatic bile ducts. In: Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, Theise ND, editors. World health organization of tumours: pathology and genetics of tumours of the digestive system. 4th ed. Lyon (France): International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC); 2010. p. 274–6.
Tunio AM, AlAsiri M, Ali AMF, AlSaeed EF, Shuja M, Fatani H. Distal humerus as delayed site of metastasis from small cell carcinoma of gallbladder. Gastrointest Med. 2013;2013:1–4.
Theise ND. Liver and gallbladder. In: Kumar V, Abbas AK, Aster JC, editors. Pathologic basis of disease. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders, an Imprint of Elsevier; 2014. p. 821–81.
Iwasa S, Morizane C, Okusaka T, Ueno H, Ikeda M, Kondo S, et al. Cisplatin and etoposide as first-line chemotherapy for poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma of the hepatobiliary tract and pancreas. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2010;40:313–8.
Lee JM, Hwang S, Lee SG, Lee YJ, Park KM, Kim KH, et al. Neuroendocrine tumors of the gallbladder: twelve cases in a single institution. Hepato-Gastroenterology. 2010;57:1064–8.
Moskal TL, Zhang PJ, Nava HR. Small cell carcinoma of the gallbladder. J Surg Oncol. 1999;70:54–9.
Mahipal A, Gupta S. Small-cell carcinoma of the gallbladder: report of a case and literature review. Gastrointest Cancer Res. 2011;4:135–6.
Maitra A, Tascilar M, Hruban RH, Offerhaus GJ, Albores–Saavedra J. Small cell carcinoma of the gallbladder: a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular pathology study of 12 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2001;25:595–601.
Uribe-Uribe NO, Jimenez-Garduño AM, Henson DE, Albores-Saavedra J. Paraneoplastic sensory neuropathy associated with small cell carcinoma of the gallbladder. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2009;13:124–6.
Travis WD, Linnoila RI, Tsokos MG, et al. Neuroendocrine tumors of the lung with proposed criteria for large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. An ultrastructural, immunohistochemical and flow cytometric study of 35 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 1991;15:529–53.
Papotti M, Cassoni P, Sapino A, Passarino G, Krueger JE, Albores-Saavedra J. Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the gallbladder: report of two cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2000;24:1424–8.
Janson ET, Sorbye H, Welin S, Federspiel B, Gronbaek H, Hellman P, et al. Nordic guidelines 2010 for diagnosis and treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Acta Oncol. 2010;49:740–56.
Pavithran K, Prabhash K, Hazarika D, Doval DC. Neuroendocrine carcinoma of gallbladder: report of 2 cases. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2005;4:144–6.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kamboj, M., Gandhi, J.S., Gupta, G. et al. Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of Gall Bladder: A Series of 19 Cases with Review of Literature. J Gastrointest Canc 46, 356–364 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-015-9745-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-015-9745-9