Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Optic neuritis: The role of disease-modifying therapy disease-modifying therapy in this clinically isolated syndrome

  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Opinion statement

Optic neuritis (ON) is an important clinical entity, which may herald the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS). Patients with acute monosymptomatic ON generally have a good visual prognosis, and the speed of recovery may be hastened with intravenous methylprednisolone. The question of whether disease-modifying therapy should be initiated after ON as a clinically isolated syndrome is a controversial topic, and factors specific to the patient should be taken into consideration before weighing in favor or against this therapeutic option. A significant proportion of patients with ON will go on to develop MS, and early initiation of therapy may delay this diagnosis. In addition, disease-modifying therapies also may reduce the disabling effects of MS among patients, but this is unknown. There are approved therapies currently available for patients with ON and an abnormal baseline cranial MRI scan, which predict a greater risk of future MS. Patients with a higher baseline MRI burden of disease, multifocal symptomatology (including sensory complaints) at onset, a high relapse rate, and a rapid accumulation of disability within the first few years of diagnosis may benefit from early and aggressive therapy with the disease-modifying drugs that are currently available. ON patients with few or no lesions on their baseline MRI scans and those with low rates of clinical relapse may be selected for careful clinical follow-up and monitored for signs of disease activity before the role of disease-modifying therapy is determined. ON patients with no light perception vision at presentation, marked optic disc swelling, and other atypical clinical features (including peripapillary hemorrhages or retinal exudates) may have a reduced risk of future MS, and for these patients, disease-modifying therapy may be deferred until it is deemed necessary by the patient and the treating physician.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Nilsson P, Larsson EM, Maly-Sundgren P, et al.: Predicting the outcome of optic neuritis—evaluation of risk factors after 30 years of follow up. J Neurol 2005, 252:396–402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Soderstrom M: Optic neuritis and multiple sclerosis. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2001, 79:223–227.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Miller D, Barkhof F, Montalban X, et al.: Clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis, part 1: natural history, pathogenesis, diagnosis and prognosis. Lancet Neurol 2005, 4:281–288.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Frohman EM, Frohman TC, Zee DS, et al.: The neuroophthalmology of multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol 2005, 4:111–121.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hickman SJ, Dalton CM, Miller DH: Management of acute optic neuritis. Lancet 2002, 360:1953–1962.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Soderstrom M, Ya-Ping J, Hillert J: Optic neuritis prognosis for multiple sclerosis from MRI, CSF, and HLA findings. Neurology 1998, 50:708–714.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cree BAC, Goodin DS, Hauser SL: Neuromyelitis optica. Semin Neurol 2002, 22:105–122.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lennon VA, Wingerchuk DM, Kryzer TJ, et al.: A serum autoantibody marker of neuromyelitis optica: distinction from multiple sclerosis. Lancet 2004, 354:2106–2112.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wingerchuk DM, Hogancamp WF, O’Brien PC, Weinshenker BG: The clinical course of neuromyelitis optica (Devic’s syndrome). Neurology 1999, 53:1107–1114.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Macfayden DJ, Drance SM, Douglas GR, et al.: The retinal nerve fiber layer, neuroretinal rim area, and visual evoked potential in MS. Neurology 1988, 38:1353–1358.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sisto D, Trojano M, Vetrugno M, et al.: Subclinical visual involvement in multiple sclerosis: a study by MRI, VEPs, frequency-doubling perimetry, standard perimetry, and contrast sensitivity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005, 4:1264–1268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Acar G, Ozakbas S, Cakmakci H, et al.: Visual evoked potential is superior to triple dose magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of optic nerve involvement. Int J Neurosci 2004, 114:1025–1033.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hood DC, Odel JG, Zhang X: Tracking the recovery of local optic nerve function after optic neuritis: a multifocal VEP study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000, 41:4032–4038.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Simon JH, McDonald WI: Assessment of optic nerve damage in multiple sclerosis using magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurol Sci 2000, 172:S23–S26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Miller D, Barkhof F, Montalban X, et al.: Clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis, part 2: non-conventional MRI, recovery processes, and management. Lancet Neurol 2005, 4:341–348.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hickman SJ, Toosy AT, Jones SJ, et al.: A serial MRI study following optic nerve mean area in acute optic neuritis. Brain 2004, 127:2498–2505.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Eggenberger ER: Inflammatory optic neuropathies. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 2001, 14:73–82.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Optic Neuritis Study Group: The five-year risk of multiple sclerosis after optic neuritis: experience of the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial. Neurology 1997, 49:1404–1413.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Optic Neuritis Study Group: High and low risk profiles for the development of multiple sclerosis within 10 years after optic neuritis. Arch Ophthalmol 2003, 121:944–949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Parisi V, Manni G, Spadaro M, et al.: Correlation between morphological and functional retinal impairment in multiple sclerosis patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999, 40:2520–2527.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Trip SA, Schlottmann PG, Jones SJ, et al.: Retinal nerve fiber layer axonal loss and visual dysfunction in optic neuritis. Ann Neurol 2005, 58:383–391.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fisher JB, Jacobs DA, Markowitz CE, et al.: Relation of visual function to retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in multiple sclerosis. Ophthalmology 2006, 113:324–332.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Costello F, Coupland S, Hodge W, et al.: Quantifying axonal loss after optic neuritis with optical coherence tomography. Ann Neurol 2006, 59:963–969.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Beck RW, Cleary PA, Anderson MM: A randomized controlled trial of corticosteroids in the treatment of acute optic neuritis. N Engl J Med 1992, 326:581–588.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Optic Neuritis Study Group: The clinical profile of optic neuritis: experience of the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial. Arch Ophthalmol 1991, 109:1673–1678.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Van Stavern GP: Management of optic neuritis and multiple sclerosis. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2001, 12:400–407.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kaufman DI, Trobe JD, Eggenberger ER: Practice parameter: the role of corticosteroids in the management of acute monosymptomatic optic neuritis. Neurology 2000, 54:2039–2044.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Beck RW, Smith CH, Gal RL et al.: Neurologic impairment 10 years after optic neuritis. Arch Neurol 2004, 9:1386–1389.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jacobs LD, Beck RW, Simon JH: Intramuscular interferon beta-1a therapy initiated during a first demyelinating event in multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 2000, 343:898–904.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Comi G, Filippi M, Barkof F: Effect of early interferon treatment on conversion to definite multiple sclerosis: a randomized study. Lancet 2001, 357:1576–1582.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kappos L, Polman CH, Freedman MS, et al.: Treatment with interferon beta-1b delays conversion to clinically definite and McDonald MS in patients with clinically isolated syndromes. Neurology 2006, 67:1242–1249.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Frohman EM, Havrdova E, Lublin F, et al.: Most patients with multiple sclerosis or a clinically isolated demyelinating syndrome should be treated at the time of diagnosis. Arch Neurol 2006, 63:614–619.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Pittock SJ, Weinshenker BG, Noseworthy JH, et al.: Not every patient with multiple sclerosis should be treated at time of diagnosis. Arch Neurol 2006, 63:611–614.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fiona Costello.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Costello, F. Optic neuritis: The role of disease-modifying therapy disease-modifying therapy in this clinically isolated syndrome. Curr Treat Options Neurol 9, 48–54 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-007-0030-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-007-0030-5

Keywords

Navigation