Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Current Indications of Neurolytic Blocks in Cancer Pain

  • Published:
Current Review of Pain Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The concept of palliative care for cancer pain treatment is being accepted throughout several countries. As a consequence, invasive procedures available to provide acceptable pain relief in cancer patients have been rediscussed in terms of less invasiveness, lower technology, and more care. Very few neurolytic blocks survive in the common clinical practice, among them the neurolytic celiac plexus block and the percutaneous cervical cordotomy are considered the most effective. The former has recently been reconsidered [1•] after years of debate in the literature; the later is a specific neurosurgical procedure that may provide regional anesthesia by destroying specific pathways with heat. In this article we’ll try to define which role both procedures may currently have in the management of cancer pain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mercadante S, Nicosia F: Celiac plexus block: a reappraisal. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 1998, 23:37–48. This article discusses the effectiveness of neurolytic celiac plexus block alone as capable of providing complete pain relief and if it should be considered as an adjuvant treatment in analgesic strategy.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kappis M: Sensibilitat and lokale anasthesie im chirurgischen gebeit der bauchkokle mit besonderer berucksichtigung der splanchnicusanashtesie. Beitr Klin Chir 1919, 115:161–175.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Plancarte R, Velasquez R, Patt RB: Neurolytic blocks of the sympathetic axis. In: Cancer Pain. Edited by Patt RB. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1993:377–425.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Moore DC: Celiac (splanchnic) plexus block with alcohol for cancer pain upper intra-abdominal viscera. In: Advances in pain research and therapy. Edited by Bonica JJ, Ventafridda V. New York:Raven Press; 1979:357–371.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ward EM, Rorie DK, Nauss LA, Bahn RC: The celiac ganglia in man: normal anatomic variations. Anesth Analg 1979, 58:461–465.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jain S, Chlang J, Vanderslice T: Is diagnostic block necessary prior to neurolytic celiac plexus block? Anesthesiology 1991, 75:A749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fuijta Y: CT-guided neurolytic splanchnic nerve block with alcohol. Pain 1993, 55:363–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ischia S, Ischia A, Polati E, Finco G: Three posterior percutaneous celiac plexus block techniques. Anesthesiology 1992, 76:534–540.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Moore DC, Bush WH, Burnett LL: Celiac plexus block. A roentgenographic anatomic study of technique and spread of solution in patients and corpses. Anesth Analg 1981, 60:369–379.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Haaga JR, Kori H, Eastwood DW, Borkowski GP: Improved technique for CT-guided celiac ganglia block. Am J Radiol 1984, 42:1201–1204.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hilgier M, Rykowski JJ: Once needle transcrural celiac plexus block. Reg Anesth 1994,19:277–283.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee MJ, Mueller PR, vanSonnenberg E, et al.: CT-guided celiac ganglion block with alcohol. Am J Roentgenol 1993, 161:633–636.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lebovits AH, Lefkowitz M: Pain management of pancreatic carcinoma: a review. Pain 1989, 36:1–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lipton S: Neurolysis:Pharmacology and drug selection. In: Cancer Pain. Edited by Patt RB. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1993:343–358.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Patt RB: Peripheral neurolysis. In: Cancer Pain. Edited by Patt RB. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1993:359–376.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vijayaram S, Chandrashekar NS, Ramamani PV, et al.: CT-guided coeliac neurolysis for upper abdominal cancer. Pain Clin 1992, 5:165–173.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Worsey J, Ferson PF, Keenan RJ, et al.: Thoracoscopic pancreatic denervation for pain control in irresctable pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 1993, 80:1051–1052.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Buy JN, Moss AA, Singler RC: CT-guided celiac plexus block and splanchnic nerve neurolysis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1982, 6:315–319.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Eisenberg E, Carr B, Chalmers TC: Neurolytic celiac plexus block for treatment of cancer pain: a meta-analysis. Anesth Analg 1995, 80:290–295.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Davies DD: Incidence of major complications of neurolytic coeliac plexus block. J R Soc Med 1993, 86:246–266.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Moore DC, Bush WH, Burnett LL: An improved technique for celiac plexus block may be more theorhetical than real. Anesthesiology 1982, 57:347–349.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mayhre J, Hilsted J, Tronier E, et al.: Monitoring of celiac plexus block in chronic pancreatitis. Pain 1989, 38:269–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Woodham MJ, Hanna MH: Paraplegia following coeliac plexus block. Anesthesia 1989, 44:487–489.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Galizia EJ, Lahiri SK: Paraplegia following coeliac plexus block with phenol. Br J Anaesth 1974, 46:539–540.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. De Conno F, Caraceni A, Aldrigetti L, et al.: Paraplegia following coeliac plexus block. Pain 1993, 55:383–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Van Dongen RT, Crul BJP: Paraplegia following coeliac plexus block. Anaesthesia 1991, 46:862–863.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Brown DL, Rorie DK: Altered reactivity of isolated segmental lumbar arteries of dogs following exposure to ethanol and phenol. Pain 1994, 56:139–143.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mercadante S: Octreotide in the treatment of diarrhea induced by celiac plexus block. Pain 1995, 61:345–346.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chan VWC: Chronic diarrhea: an uncommon side effect of celiac plexus block. Anesth Analg 1996, 82:205–207.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sharfman WH, Walsh TD: Has the analgesic efficacy of neurolytic celiac plexus block been demonstrated in pancreatic cancer pain? Pain 1990, 41:267–271.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Coombs DW, Savage S: Persistent pain following intraoperative celiac plexus neurolysis. Clin J Pain 1985, 1:155–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hanna M, Peat SJ, Woodham MJ, et al.: The use of coeliac plexus blockade in patients with chronic pain. Palliat Med 1989, 5:11–16.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Brown DL, Bulley CCK, Quiel EC: Neurolytic celiac plexus block for pancreatic cancer pain. Anesth Analg 1987, 66:869–874.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mercadante S: Celiac plexus block versus analgesics in pancreatic cancer pain. Pain 1993, 52:187–192.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mullan S, Mallis M, Karasick J, et al.: A reappraisal of the unipolar anodal electrolytic lesion. J Neurosurgery 1965, 22:531.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Rosomoff HL, Carroll F, Brown J, Sheptak P: Percutaneous radiofrequency cervical cordotomy technique. J Neurosurgery 1965, 23:639.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Lipton S: Percutaneous electrical cordotomy in relief of intractable pain. BMJ 1968, 2:210.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ischia S, Ischia A, Luzzani A, et al.: Results up to death in the treatment of persistent cervico-thoracic (Pancoast) and thoracic malignant pain by unilateral percutaneous cervical cordotomy. Pain 1985, 21:239–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nicosia, F., Mercadante, S. Current Indications of Neurolytic Blocks in Cancer Pain. Current Review of Pain 2, 175–180 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-998-0016-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-998-0016-3

Keywords

Navigation