Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ganglion Impar Blockade: A Review

  • Anesthetic Techniques in Pain Management (KA Williams, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Pain and Headache Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since its original description in 1990, blockade of the ganglion impar (ganglion of Walther) has become a widely used intervention in the management of pelvic and perineal pain. We review the indications, techniques, and evidence for this pain intervention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. Oh CS, Chung IH, Ji HJ, et al. Clinical implications of topographic anatomy on the ganglion impar. Anesthesiology. 2004;101:249–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Plancarte R, Amescua C, Patt RB, et al. Presacral blockade of the Ganglion of Walther (Ganglion Impar). Anesthesiology. 1990;73:A751.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Reig E, Abejón D, del Pozo C, et al. Thermocoagulation of the ganglion impar or ganglion of Walther: description of a modified approach. Preliminary results in chronic, nononcological pain. Pain Pract. 2005;5:103–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Green IC, Cohen SL, Finkenzeller D, et al. Interventional therapies for controlling pelvic pain: what is the evidence? Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2010;14:22–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim ST, Ryu SJ. Treatment of hyperhidrosis occurring during hemodialysis: Ganglion impar block: a case report. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2005;48:553–6.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sağir O, Ozaslan S, Köroğlu A. Application of ganglion impar block in patient with coccyx dislocation. Agri. 2011;23:129–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Toshniwal GR, Dureja GP, Prashanth SM. Transsacrooccygeal approach to ganglion impar block for management of chronic perineal pain: a prospective observational study. Pain Phys. 2007;10:661–6.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nebab EG, Florence IM. An alternative needle geometry for interruption of the ganglion impar. Anesthesiology. 1997;86:1213–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wemm Jr K, Saberski L. Modified approach to block the ganglion impar (ganglion of Walther.). Reg Anesth. 1995;20:544–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Loev MA, Varklet VL, Wilsey BL, et al. Cryoablation: a novel approach to neurolysis of the ganglion impar. Anesthesiology. 1998;88:1391–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Munir MA, Zhang J, Ahmad M. A modified needle-inside-needle technique for the ganglion impar block. Can J Anesth. 2004;51:915–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Foye PM, Buttaci CJ, Stitik TP, et al. Successful injection for coccyx pain. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;85:783–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hong JH, Jang HS. Block of the ganglion impar using a coccygeal joint approach. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2006;31:583–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Foye PM. New approaches to ganglion impar blocks via coccygeal joints. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007;32:269.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hong JH, Jang HS. Block of the ganglion impar using a coccygeal joint approach. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2006;31:583–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Postacchini F, Massobrio M. Idiopathic coccygodynia. Analysis of fifty-one operative cases and a radiographic study of the normal coccyx. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983;65:1116–24.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Toshniwal GR, Dureja GP, Prashanth SM. Transsacrococcygeal approach to ganglion impar block for management of chronic perineal pain: a prospective observational study. Pain Phys. 2007;10:661–6.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Eker HE, Cok OY, Kocum A, et al. Transsacrococcygeal approach to ganglion impar for pelvic cancer pain: a report of 3 cases. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2008;33:381–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Huang JJ. Another modified approach to the ganglion of Walther block (ganglion of impar). J Clin Anesth. 2003;15:282–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. McAllister RK. Paramedial approach to the ganglion impar. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007;32:367.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. • Foye PM, Patel SI. Paracoccygeal corkscrew approach to ganglion impar injections for tailbone pain. Pain Pract. 2009;9:317–21. This article provides a clear step-wise account of a new technical approach to the ganglion impar block which requires only the lateral fluoroscopic view.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ho KY, Nagi PA, Gray L, et al. An alternative approach to ganglion impar neurolysis under computed tomography guidance for recurrent vulval cancer. Anesthesiology. 2006;105:861–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Foye PM. Ganglion impar injection techniques for coccydynia (coccyx pain) and pelvic pain. Anesthesiology. 2007;106:1062–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. • Agarwal-Kozlowski K, Lorke DE, Habermann CR, et al. CT-guided blocks and neuroablation of the ganglion impar (Walther) in perineal pain: anatomy, technique, safety and efficacy. Clin J Pain. 2009;25:570–6. This article demonstrates statistically the efficacy of the ganglion impar block performed using a CT-guided lateral approach.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ellinas H, Sethna NF. Ganglion impar block for management of chronic coccydynia in an adolescent. Paediatr Anaesth. 2009;19:1137–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Datir A, Connell D. CT-guided injection for ganglion impar blockade: a radiological approach to the management of coccydynia. Clin Radiol. 2010;65:21–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. • Lin CS, Cheng JK, Hsu YW, et al. Ultrasound-guided ganglion impar block: a technical report. Pain Med. 2010;11:390–4. This technical report provides the practitioner with a detailed description of how to use ultrasonography to aid the identification of, and transit through the sacrococcygeal joint when the joint cannot readily be seen on fluoroscopy.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. • Johnston PJ, Michálek P. Blockade of the ganglion impar (walther), using ultrasound and a loss of resistance technique. Prague Med Rep. 2012;113:53–7. This report describes how diagnostic ganglion impar blockade can be done at thebedside,’ using ultrasound to identify the sacrococcygeal junction as previously described, but then using a loss of resistance technique to gauge needle depth, negating the need to use ionising radiation.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. • Bhatnager S, Khanna S, Roshni S, et al. Early ultrasound-guided neurolysis for pain management in gastrointestinal and pelvic malignancies: an observational study in a tertiary care center of urban India. 2012;12:23–32. In this observational study the authors describe the use of ultrasound in the assessment of the spread of the injectate during ganglion impar block, once again allowing it to be performed at the bedside. They then perform statistical analysis of the efficacy of the technique on multidimensional pain scores, although the number of patients in the study who underwent ganglion impar block was small.

  30. Lim SJ, Park HJ, Lee SH, et al. Ganglion impar block with botulinum toxin type A for chronic perineal pain - a case report. Korean J Pain. 2010;23:65–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Karaman H, Tüfek A, Kavak GO, et al. Would pulsed radiofrequency applied to different anatomical regions have effective results for chronic pain treatment? J Pak Med Assoc. 2011;61:879–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. de Leon-Casasola OA. Superior hypogastric plexus block and ganglion impar neurolysis for pain associated with cancer. Tech Reg Anesth Pain Manag. 1997;1:27–31.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Vranken JH, Bannink IMJ, Zuurmond WWA. Invasive procedures in patients with coccygodynia: caudal epidural infiltration, pudendal nerve block, and blockade of the ganglion impar. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2000;25:25.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Demircay E, Kabatas S, Cansever T, et al. Radiofrequency thermocoagulation of ganglion impar in the management if coccydynia: preliminary results. Turkish Neurosurg. 2010;20:328–33.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Patijin J, Janssen M, Hayek S, et al. Coccydynia. Pain Pract. 2010;10:554–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Russo MA. Letter to the editor regarding Reig, et al., Thermocoagulation of the ganglion impar of Walther: description of a modified approach. Preliminary results in chronic, nononcological pain. Pain Pract. 2005;5:367–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Abejón D, Reig E. Reply to Dr Marc Russo. Pain Pract. 2005;5:367–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge Dr Arun Bhaskar for supplying the images used in this review.

Disclosure

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julian Trevor Scott-Warren.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Anesthetic Techniques in Pain Management

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scott-Warren, J.T., Hill, V. & Rajasekaran, A. Ganglion Impar Blockade: A Review. Curr Pain Headache Rep 17, 306 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-012-0306-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-012-0306-7

Keywords

Navigation