Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation of Aortic Stenosis: an Update—Including Low-Flow States, Myocardial Mechanics, and Stress Testing

  • Echocardiography (JM Gardin, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Cardiology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Degenerative aortic stenosis (AS) is one of the most frequent valvular heart diseases in Western countries. Echocardiography plays a central role in the evaluation and management of patients with AS. To overcome the inherent inconsistencies between the echocardiographic parameters defining severe AS and to unify concepts, a new classification based on the interplay between flow and gradients has recently been adopted. Outcome studies of asymptomatic patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), as classified by this new approach, have shown that low-flow (LF) states are associated with poor outcome, that the classical normal-flow/high-gradient pattern has an intermediate outcome, while normal-flow/low-gradient severe AS seems to have an outcome comparable to moderate AS and such patients do not benefit from aortic valve replacement. Patients with LF/low-gradient severe AS with preserved LVEF, also known as “paradoxical LF/low-gradient AS,” have the worst outcome and benefit greatly from surgical or percutaneous valve replacement, provided that severity is proven. In patients with LF/low-gradient and depressed LVEF, dobutamine stress echocardiography has an important role to distinguish severe from pseudo-severe AS and to assess surgical risk. Assessment of aortic valve calcium score, as well as computation of projected effective orifice aortic area at normal trans-valvular flow rates, has proved to be very useful to distinguish severe from pseudo-severe AS in LF/low-gradient AS with both reduced and preserved LVEF. Asymptomatic patients with normal flow/gradient should be submitted to an exercise test; exercise echocardiography can identify patients at increased risk when mean gradient increases by >18–20 mmHg and/or pulmonary arterial hypertension develops during exercise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Carabello BA. Introduction to aortic stenosis. Circ Res. 2013;113:179–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Vahanian A, Alfieri O, Andreotti F, et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012): the Joint Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;42:S1–S44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:2438–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rosenhek R, Binder T, Porenta G, et al. Predictors of outcome in severe, asymptomatic aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:611–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rosenhek R, Zilberszac R, Schemper M, et al. Natural history of very severe aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2010;121:151–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Das P, Rimington H, Chambers J. Exercise testing to stratify risk in aortic stenosis. Eur Heart J. 2005;26:1309–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Steadman CD, Ray S, Ng LL, et al. Natriuretic peptides in common valvular heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:2034–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Omran H, Schmidt H, Hackenbroch M, et al. Silent and apparent cerebral embolism after retrograde catheterisation of the aortic valve in valvular stenosis: a prospective, randomised study. Lancet. 2003;361:1241–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Minners J, Allgeier M, Gohlke-Baerwolf C, et al. Inconsistencies of echocardiographic criteria for the grading of aortic valve stenosis. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:1043–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dumesnil JG, Pibarot P, Carabello B. Paradoxical low flow and/or low gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: implications for diagnosis and treatment. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:281–9. This is the first article to propose a new classification of AS with regard to flow-gradient patterns.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hachicha Z, Dumesnil JG, Bogaty P, et al. Paradoxical low flow, low gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved ejection fraction is associated with higher afterload and reduced survival. Circulation. 2007;115:2856–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lancellotti P, Magne J, Donal E, et al. Clinical outcome in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: insights from the new proposed aortic stenosis grading classification. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:235–43. This is the article that studied the outcome of patients with AS according to their flow-gradient pattern.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Eleid MF, Sorajja P, Michelena HI, et al. Flow-gradient patterns in severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction: clinical characteristics and predictors of survival. Circulation. 2013;128:1781–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Aortic stenosis suspected to be severe despite low gradients. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7:545–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jander N. Low-gradient ‘severe’ aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction: new entity, or discrepant definitions? Eur Heart J. 2008;10:E-11–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Barasch E, Fan D, Chukwu EO, et al. Severe isolated aortic stenosis with normal left ventricular systolic function and low transvalvular gradients: pathophysiologic and prognostic insights. J Heart Valve Dis. 2008;17:81–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pai RG, Varadarajan P, Razzouk A. Survival benefit of aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis with low ejection fraction and low gradient with normal ejection fraction. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;86:1781–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. de Filippi CR, Willett DL, Brickner E, et al. Usefulness of dobutamine echocardiography in distinguishing severe from nonsevere valvular aortic stenosis in patients with depressed left ventricular function and low transvalvular gradients. Am J Cardiol. 1995;75:191–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Monin JL, Monchi M, Gest V, et al. Aortic stenosis with severe left ventricular dysfunction and low transvalvular pressure gradients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:2101–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Schwammenthal E, Vered Z, Moshkowitz Y, et al. Dobutamine echocardiography in patients with aortic stenosis and left ventricular dysfunction: predicting outcome as a function of management strategy. Chest. 2001;119:1766–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fougeres E, Tribouilloy C, Monchi M, et al. Outcomes of pseudo-severe aortic stenosis under conservative treatment. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:2426–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Blais C, Burwash IG, Mundigler G, et al. The projected valve area at normal flow rate improves the assessment of stenosis severity in patients with low flow aortic stenosis: the multicenter TOPAS (Truly or Pseudo Severe Aortic Stenosis) study. Circulation. 2006;113:711–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Clavel MA, Burwash IG, Mundigler G, et al. Validation of conventional and simplified methods to calculate projected valve area at normal flow rate in patients with low flow, low gradient aortic stenosis: the multicenter TOPAS (True or Pseudo Severe Aortic Stenosis) study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010;23:380–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cueff C, Serfaty JM, Cimadevilla C, et al. Measurement of aortic valve calcification using multislice computed tomography: correlation with haemodynamic severity of aortic stenosis and clinical implication for patients with low ejection fraction. Heart. 2011;97:721–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Clavel MA, Messika-Zeitoun D, Pibarot P, et al. The complex nature of discordant severe calcified aortic valve disease grading: new insights from combined Doppler echocardiographic and computed tomographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:2329–38. This is the first article showing that aortic valve calcium load is different in men and women for the same degree of hemodynamic severity.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Monin JL, Quere JP, Monchi M, et al. Low-gradient aortic stenosis: operative risk stratification and predictors for long-term outcome: a multicenter study using dobutamine stress hemodynamics. Circulation. 2003;108:319–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Quere JP, Monin JL, Levy F, et al. Influence of preoperative left ventricular contractile reserve on postoperative ejection fraction in low-gradient aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2006;113:1738–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tribouilloy C, Levy F, Rusinaru D, et al. Outcome after aortic valve replacement for low-flow/low-gradient aortic stenosis without contractile reserve on dobutamine stress echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:1865–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cramariuc D, Cioffi G, Rieck AE, et al. Low-flow aortic stenosis in asymptomatic patients: valvular-arterial impedance and systolic function from the SEAS Substudy. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2:390–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hachicha Z, Dumesnil JG, Pibarot P. Usefulness of the valvuloarterial impedance to predict adverse outcome in asymptomatic aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:1003–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lancellotti P, Donal E, Magne J, et al. Risk stratification in asymptomatic moderate to severe aortic stenosis: the importance of the valvular, arterial and ventricular interplay. Heart. 2010;96:1364–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Qi W, Mathisen P, Kjekshus J, et al. Natriuretic peptides in patients with aortic stenosis. Am Heart J. 2001;142:725–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Talwar S, Downie PF, Squire IB, et al. Plasma N-terminal pro BNP and cardiotrophin-1 are elevated in aortic stenosis. Eur J Heart Fail. 2001;3:15–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Prasad N, Bridges AB, Lang CC, et al. Brain natriuretic peptide concentrations in patients with aortic stenosis. Am Heart J. 1997;133:477–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Gerber IL, Stewart RA, Legget ME, et al. Increased plasma natriuretic peptide levels reflect symptom onset in aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2003;107:1884–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bergler-Klein J, Klaar U, Heger M, et al. Natriuretic peptides predict symptom-free survival and postoperative outcome in severe aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2004;109:2302–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Lim P, Monin JL, Monchi M, et al. Predictors of outcome in patients with severe aortic stenosis and normal left ventricular function: role of B-type natriuretic peptide. Eur Heart J. 2004;25:2048–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Gerber IL, Legget ME, West TM, et al. Usefulness of serial measurement of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide plasma levels in asymptomatic patients with aortic stenosis to predict symptomatic deterioration. Am J Cardiol. 2005;95:898–901.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Monin JL, Lancellotti P, Monchi M, et al. Risk score for predicting outcome in patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2009;120:69–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Alborino D, Hoffmann JL, Fournet PC, et al. Value of exercise testing to evaluate the indication for surgery in asymptomatic patients with valvular aortic stenosis. J Heart Valve Dis. 2002;11:204–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Amato MC, Moffa PJ, Werner KE, et al. Treatment decision in asymptomatic aortic valve stenosis: role of exercise testing. Heart. 2001;86:381–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Iung B, Baron G, Butchart EG, et al. A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: The Euro Heart Survey on Valvular Heart Disease. Eur Heart J. 2003;24:1231–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Lancellotti P, Lebois F, Simon M, et al. Prognostic importance of quantitative exercise Doppler echocardiography in asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2005;112:I377–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Marechaux S, Hachicha Z, Bellouin A, et al. Usefulness of exercise-stress echocardiography for risk stratification of true asymptomatic patients with aortic valve stenosis. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:1390–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Lancellotti P, Magne J, Donal E, et al. Determinants and prognostic significance of exercise pulmonary hypertension in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2012;126:851–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Eleid MF, Sorajja P, Michelena HI, et al. Survival by stroke volume index in patients with low-gradient normal EF severe aortic stenosis. Heart. 2015;101:23–9.

  47. Clavel MA, Dumesnil JG, Capoulade R, et al. Outcome of patients with aortic stenosis, small valve area, and low-flow, low-gradient despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:1259–67. An important study confirming prospectively the poor outcome of patients with paradoxical low-flow/low-gradient AS.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Otto CM, Burwash IG, Legget ME, et al. Prospective study of asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis. Clinical, echocardiographic, and exercise predictors of outcome. Circulation. 1997;95:2262–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Pellikka PA, Sarano ME, Nishimura RA, et al. Outcome of 622 adults with asymptomatic, hemodynamically significant aortic stenosis during prolonged follow-up. Circulation. 2005;111:3290–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Lancellotti P, Moonen M, Magne J, et al. Prognostic effect of long-axis left ventricular dysfunction and B-type natriuretic peptide levels in asymptomatic aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol. 2010;105:383–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Lafitte S, Perlant M, Reant P, et al. Impact of impaired myocardial deformations on exercise tolerance and prognosis in patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2009;10:414–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Marechaux S, Ennezat PV, LeJemtel TH, et al. Left ventricular response to exercise in aortic stenosis: an exercise echocardiographic study. Echocardiography. 2007;24:955–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Capoulade R, Magne J, Dulgheru R, et al. Prognostic value of plasma B-type natriuretic peptide levels after exercise in patients with severe asymptomatic aortic stenosis. Heart. 2014;100:1606–12.

Download references

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of Interest

Luc A. Pierard and Raluca Dulgheru declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cardiology, CHU Sart Tilman, University of Liege, 4000, Liege, Belgium

    Luc A. Pierard & Raluca Dulgheru

Authors
  1. Luc A. Pierard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Raluca Dulgheru
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luc A. Pierard.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Echocardiography

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pierard, L.A., Dulgheru, R. Evaluation of Aortic Stenosis: an Update—Including Low-Flow States, Myocardial Mechanics, and Stress Testing. Curr Cardiol Rep 17, 42 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-015-0601-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-015-0601-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation