Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How to Choose the Best Metabolic Procedure?

  • Lipid and Metabolic Effects of Gastrointestinal Surgery (R. Cohen, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Atherosclerosis Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bariatric/metabolic surgery has proven to be effective in inducing and maintaining diabetes remission—although with a percentage of patients undergoing hyperglycemia relapse—weight loss, and improvement of the cardiovascular risk. It is, however, associated with mortality, although low, and early and late complications. In particular, metabolic complications are related to vitamin deficiency due to the erratic absorption of the supplemented vitamins and to the unpredictable compliance of patients to vitamin and trace element supplementation. In addition, often, the general practitioners and even the specialists are unaware of the clinical effects of metabolic dysfunction following malabsorptive surgery. The choice of the surgical procedure should be the balance between benefits and risks. Our review addresses this important question trying to give some suggestions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance, •• Of major importance

  1. World Health Organization (WHO), World Health Statistics, Fact Sheet N.311: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/

  2. Yu J, Zhou X, Li L, Li S, Tan J, Li Y, et al. The long-term effects of bariatric surgery for type 2 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized evidence. Obes Surg. 2015;25(1):143–58. doi:10.1007/s11695-014-1460-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chang SH, Stoll CR, Song J, Varela JE, Eagon CJ, Colditz GA. The effectiveness and risks of bariatric surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis, 2003-2012. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(3):275–87. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2013.3654.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Gloy VL, Briel M, Bhatt DL, Kashyap SR, Schauer PR, Mingrone G, et al. Bariatric surgery versus non-surgical treatment for obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2013;347:f5934. doi:10.1136/bmj.f5934. This is a review of randomized controlled trials with a follow-up ≥6 months comparing bariatric-metabolic surgery with medical treatment for type 2 diabetes and meta-analysis of results from 11 studies including 796 individuals with BMI ranging from 30 to 50 kg/m2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Mingrone G, Panunzi S, De Gaetano A, Guidone C, Iaconelli A, Nanni G, et al. Bariatric-metabolic surgery versus conventional medical treatment in obese patients with type 2 diabetes: 5 year follow-up of an open-label, single-centre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;386(9997):964–73. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00075-6. This is, at the moment, the only long-term randomized controlled study (follow-up at 5 years) reporting the effects of bariatric-metabolic surgery on type 2 diabetes remission in comparison with medical treatment.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mingrone G, Panunzi S, De Gaetano A, Guidone C, Iaconelli A, Leccesi L, et al. Bariatric surgery versus conventional medical therapy for type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(17):1577–85. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1200111. This randomized controlled study reports the effects of bariatric-metabolic surgery, including gastric bypass and bilio-pancreatic diversion, versus medical therapy on type 2 diabetes remission at 2 years.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee GK, Cha YM. Cardiovascular benefits of bariatric surgery. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2015. doi:10.1016/j.tcm.2015.07.006 [Epub ahead of print].

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sjöström L, Peltonen M, Jacobson P, Sjöström CD, Karason K, Wedel H, et al. Bariatric surgery and long-term cardiovascular events. JAMA. 2012;307(1):56–65. doi:10.1001/jama.2011.1914.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. NIH conference. Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity. Consensus Development Conference Panel. Ann Intern Med. 1991;115(12):956–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brolin RE. Update: NIH consensus conference. Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity. Nutrition. 1996;12:403–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dixon JB, Zimmet P, Alberti KG, Rubino F, International Diabetes Federation Taskforce on Epidemiology and Prevention. Bariatric surgery: an IDF statement for obese type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2011;28(6):628–42. doi:10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03306.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Obesity: identification, assessment and management NICE clinical guidelines; Published date: November 2014: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg189

  13. Laferrère B, Teixeira J, McGinty J, Tran H, Egger JR, Colarusso A, et al. Effect of weight loss by gastric bypass surgery versus hypocaloric diet on glucose and incretin levels in patients with type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(7):2479–85. doi:10.1210/jc.2007-2851.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Cox AJ, West NP, Cripps AW. Obesity, inflammation, and the gut microbiota. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015;3(3):207–15. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(14)70134-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dalmas E, Venteclef N, Caer C, Poitou C, Cremer I, Aron-Wisnewsky J, et al. T cell-derived IL-22 amplifies IL-1β-driven inflammation in human adipose tissue: relevance to obesity and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2014;63(6):1966–77. doi:10.2337/db13-1511.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fain JN, Madan AK, Hiler ML, Cheema P, Bahouth SW. Comparison of the release of adipokines by adipose tissue, adipose tissue matrix, and adipocytes from visceral and subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissues of obese humans. Endocrinology. 2004;145(5):2273–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tremaroli V, Bäckhed F. Functional interactions between the gut microbiota and host metabolism. Nature. 2012;489(7415):242–9. doi:10.1038/nature11552.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yousseif A, Emmanuel J, Karra E, Millet Q, Elkalaawy M, Jenkinson AD, et al. Differential effects of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and laparoscopic gastric bypass on appetite, circulating acyl-ghrelin, peptide YY3-36 and active GLP-1 levels in non-diabetic humans. Obes Surg. 2014;24(2):241–52. doi:10.1007/s11695-013-1066-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Food and Drug administration; Lap-Band Adjustable Gastric Banding System: http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/DeviceApprovalsandClearances/Recently-ApprovedDevices/ucm248133.htm

  20. Angrisani L, Cutolo PP, Formisano G, Nosso G, Santonicola A, Vitolo G. Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding (LAGB) in moderately obese patients with and without co-morbidities. Obes Surg. 2013;23(7):897–902. doi:10.1007/s11695-013-0877-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, Jensen MD, Pories W, Fahrbach K, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292(14):1724–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Michalik M, Lech P, Bobowicz M, Orlowski M, Lehmann A. A 5-year experience with laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding—focus on outcomes, complications, and their management. Obes Surg. 2011;21(11):1682–6. doi:10.1007/s11695-011-0453-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lanthaler M, Aigner F, Kinzl J, Sieb M, Cakar-Beck F, Nehoda H. Long-term results and complications following adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2010;20(8):1078–85. doi:10.1007/s11695-010-0190-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cottam DR, Atkinson J, Anderson A, Grace B, Fisher B. A case-controlled matched pair cohort study of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and Lap-Band patients in a single US center with three-year follow-up. Obes Surg. 2006;16(5):534–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim TH, Daud A, Ude AO, DiGiorgi M, Olivero-Rivera L, Schrope B, et al. Early U.S. outcomes of laparoscopic gastric bypass versus laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding for morbid obesity. Surg Endosc. 2006;20(2):202–9. Epub 2005 Dec 6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hutter MM, Schirmer BD, Jones DB, Ko CY, Cohen ME, Merkow RP, et al. First report from the American College of Surgeons Bariatric Surgery Center Network: laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy has morbidity and effectiveness positioned between the band and the bypass. Ann Surg. 2011;254(3):410–20. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e31822c9dac. discussion 420-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Favretti F, Segato G, Ashton D, Busetto L, De Luca M, Mazza M, et al. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in 1,791 consecutive obese patients: 12-year results. Obes Surg. 2007;17(2):168–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lanthaler M, Aigner F, Kinzl J, Sieb M, Cakar-Beck F, Nehoda H. Long-term results and complications following adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2010;20(8):1078–85. doi:10.1007/s11695-010-0190-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Naef M, Mouton WG, Naef U, Kummer O, Muggli B. Wagner HE Graft survival and complications after laparoscopic gastric banding for morbid obesity—lessons learned from a 12-year experience. Obes Surg. 2010;20(9):1206–14. doi:10.1007/s11695-010-0205-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bowne WB, Julliard K, Castro AE, Shah P, Morgenthal CB, Ferzli GS. Laparoscopic gastric bypass is superior to adjustable gastric band in super morbidly obese patients: a prospective, comparative analysis. Arch Surg. 2006;141(7):683–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. O’Brien PE, MacDonald L, Anderson M, Brennan L, Brown WA. Long-term outcomes after bariatric surgery: fifteen-year follow-up of adjustable gastric banding and a systematic review of the bariatric surgical literature. Ann Surg. 2013;257(1):87–94. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e31827b6c02.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Chakravarty PD, McLaughlin E, Whittaker D, Byrne E, Cowan E, Xu K, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) with other bariatric procedures; a systematic review of the randomised controlled trials. Surgeon. 2012;10(3):172–82. doi:10.1016/j.surge.2012.02.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Brethauer SA, Aminian A, Romero-Talamás H, Batayyah E, Mackey J, Kennedy L, et al. Can diabetes be surgically cured? Long-term metabolic effects of bariatric surgery in obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Ann Surg. 2013;258(4):628–36. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a5034b. discussion 636-7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Colquitt JL, Pickett K, Loveman E, Frampton GK. Surgery for weight loss in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;8:CD003641. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003641.pub4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang S, Li P, Sun XF, Ye NY, Xu ZK, Wang D. Comparison between laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for morbid obesity: a meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2013;23(7):980–6. doi:10.1007/s11695-013-0893-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Diamantis T, Apostolou KG, Alexandrou A, Griniatsos J, Felekouras E, Tsigris C. Review of long-term weight loss results after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10(1):177–83. doi:10.1016/j.soard.2013.11.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Marceau P, Biron S, Marceau S, Hould FS, Lebel S, Lescelleur O, et al. Biliopancreatic diversion-duodenal switch: independent contributions of sleeve resection and duodenal exclusion. Obes Surg. 2014;24(11):1843–9. doi:10.1007/s11695-014-1284-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Biertho L, Simon-Hould F, Marceau S, Lebel S, Lescelleur O, Biron S. Current outcomes of laparoscopic duodenal switch. Ann Surg Innov Res. 2016;10:1. doi:10.1186/s13022-016-0024-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Hess DS, Hess DW, Oakley RS. The biliopancreatic diversion with the duodenal switch: results beyond 10 years. Obes Surg. 2005;15(3):408–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. O’Brien PE, McPhail T, Chaston TB, Dixon JB. Systematic review of medium-term weight loss after bariatric operations. Obes Surg. 2006;16(8):1032–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Biertho L, Lebel S, Marceau S, Hould FS, Lescelleur O, Marceau P, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: with or without duodenal switch? A consecutive series of 800 cases. Dig Surg. 2014;31(1):48–54. doi:10.1159/000354313.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Puzziferri N, Roshek 3rd TB, Mayo HG, Gallagher R, Belle SH, Livingston EH. Long-term follow-up after bariatric surgery: a systematic review. JAMA. 2014;312(9):934–42. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.10706.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Li JF, Lai DD, Lin ZH, Jiang TY, Zhang AM, Dai JF. Comparison of the long-term results of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized trials. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2014;24(1):1–11. doi:10.1097/SLE.0000000000000041.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Cho JM, Kim HJ, Lo Menzo E, Park S, Szomstein S, Rosenthal RJ. Effect of sleeve gastrectomy on type 2 diabetes as an alternative treatment modality to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: systemic review and meta-analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(6):1273–80. doi:10.1016/j.soard.2015.03.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Hutter MM, Schirmer BD, Jones DB, Ko CY, Cohen ME, Merkow RP, et al. First report from the American College of Surgeons Bariatric Surgery Center Network: laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy has morbidity and effectiveness positioned between the band and the bypass. Ann Surg. 2011;254(3):410–20. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e31822c9dac. discussion 420-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Buchwald H, Estok R, Fahrbach K, Banel D, Jensen MD, Pories WJ, et al. Weight and type 2 diabetes after bariatric surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Med. 2009;122(3):248-256.e5. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.09.041.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Bolckmans R, Himpens J. Long-term (>10 yrs) outcome of the laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. Ann Surg. 2016;13 [Epub ahead of print].

  48. Marceau P, Biron S, Hould FS, Lebel S, Marceau S, Lescelleur O, et al. Duodenal switch: long-term results. Obes Surg. 2007;17(11):1421–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Nelson DW, Blair KS, Martin MJ. Analysis of obesity-related outcomes and bariatric failure rates with the duodenal switch vs gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Arch Surg. 2012;147(9):847–54. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2012.1654.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Li J, Lai D, Wu D. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy to treat morbid obesity-related comorbidities: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2016;26(2):429–42. doi:10.1007/s11695-015-1996-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Favretti F, Ashton D, Busetto L, Segato G, De Luca M. The gastric band: first-choice procedure for obesity surgery. World J Surg. 2009;33(10):2039–48. doi:10.1007/s00268-009-0091-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Mans E, Serra-Prat M, Palomera E, Suñol X, Clavé P. Sleeve gastrectomy effects on hunger, satiation, and gastrointestinal hormone and motility responses after a liquid meal test. Am J Clin Nutr. 2015;102(3):540–7. doi:10.3945/ajcn.114.104307.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Paulus GF, de Vaan LE, Verdam FJ, Bouvy ND, Ambergen TA, van Heurn LW. Bariatric surgery in morbidly obese adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2015;25(5):860–78. doi:10.1007/s11695-015-1581-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Khan S, Rock K, Baskara A, Qu W, Nazzal M, Ortiz J. Trends in bariatric surgery from 2008 to 2012. Am J Surg. 2015. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.10.012 [Epub ahead of print].

    Google Scholar 

  55. DeMaria EJ, Pate V, Warthen M, Winegar DA. Baseline data from American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery-designated Bariatric Surgery Centers of Excellence using the Bariatric Outcomes Longitudinal Database. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6(4):347–55. doi:10.1016/j.soard.2009.11.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, Formisano G, Buchwald H, Scopinaro N. Bariatric surgery worldwide 2013. Obes Surg. 2015;25(10):1822–32. doi:10.1007/s11695-015-1657-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Gluck B, Movitz B, Jansma S, Gluck J, Laskowski K. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is a safe and effective bariatric procedure for the lower BMI (35.0–43.0 kg/m2) population brian. Obes Surg. 2011;21(8):1168–71. doi:10.1007/s11695-010-0332-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Oor JE, Roks DJ, Ünlü Ç, Hazebroek EJ. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg. 2016;211(1):250–67. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.05.031.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Miller K, Pump A, Hell E. Vertical banded gastroplasty versus adjustable gastric banding: prospective long-term follow-up study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3(1):84–90. Epub 2006 Nov 20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Korner J, Bessler M, Cirilo LJ, Conwell IM, Daud A, Restuccia NL, et al. Effects of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery on fasting and postprandial concentrations of plasma ghrelin, peptide YY, and insulin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(1):359–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Scopinaro N, Gianetta E, Civalleri D, Bonalumi U, Bachi V. Bilio-pancreatic bypass for obesity: II. Initial experience in man. Br J Surg. 1979;66(9):618–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Rosenthal RJ, International sleeve gastrectomy expert panel, Diaz AA, Arvidsson D, Baker RS, Basso N, et al. International sleeve gastrectomy expert panel consensus statement: best practice guidelines based on experience of 12,000 cases. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8(1):8–19. doi:10.1016/j.soard.2011.10.019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lidia Castagneto Gissey.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Lidia Castagneto Gissey and James Rossario Casella Mariolo declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Geltrude Mingrone declares grant support from Fractyl Inc. and Metacure, and declares personal fees for consultant work for Fractyl Inc. and Novo Nordisk.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Lipid and Metabolic Effects of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Castagneto Gissey, L., Casella Mariolo, J.R. & Mingrone, G. How to Choose the Best Metabolic Procedure?. Curr Atheroscler Rep 18, 43 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-016-0590-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-016-0590-5

Keywords

Navigation