Skip to main content
Log in

On representations of GL(n) distinguished by GL(n − 1) over a p-adic field

  • Published:
Israel Journal of Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For a nonarchimedean local field F, let GL(n):= GL(n, F) and GL(n−1) be embedded in GL(n) via g ↦ ( g 00 1 ). Let π be an irreducible admissible representation of GL(n) for n ≥ 3. We prove that π is GL(n − 1)-distinguished if and only if the Langlands parameter L(π) associated to π by the Local Langlands Correspondence has a subrepresentation L(11 n−2) of dimension n−2 corresponding to the trivial representation of GL(n−2) such that the two-dimensional quotient L(π)/L(11 n−2) corresponds either to an infinite-dimensional representation or the one-dimensional representations \(\nu ^{ \pm (\tfrac{{n - 2}}{2})} \) of GL(2). We also prove that, for a parabolic subgroup P of GL(n) and an irreducible admissible representation ρ of the Levi subgroup of P, \(\dim _\mathbb{C} (Hom_{GL(n - 1)} [ind_P^{GL(n)} (\rho ),\mathbb{I}_{n - 1} ]) \leqslant 2\). For the standard Borel subgroup B n of GL(n) and characters x i of GL(1), we classify all representations ξ of the form \(ind_{B_n }^{GL(n)} (\chi _1 \otimes \cdots \otimes \chi _n )\) for which \(\dim _\mathbb{C} (Hom_{GL(n - 1)} [\xi ,\mathbb{I}_{n - 1} ]) = 2\).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Aizenbud, D. Gourevitch, S. Rallis and G. Schiffman, Multiplicity one theorems, Annals of Mathematics 172 (2010), 1407–1434.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Aizenbud, D. Gourevitch and E. Sayag, (GL n+1(F), GLn(F)) is a Gel’fand pair for any local field F, Compositio Mathematica 144 (2008), 1504–1524.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. I. N. Bernstein and A. V. Zelevinsky, Representations of the group GL(n, F) where F is a local non-archimedean field, Russian Mathematical Surveys 31 (1976), 1–68.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. I. N. Bernstein and A. V. Zelevinsky, Induced representations of reductive p-adic groups I, Annales Scientifiques de l’École Normale Supérieure 10 (1977), 441–472.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. J. Cogdell and I. I. Piatetski Shapiro, Derivatives and L-functions of GL(n), The Heritage of B. Moishezon, IMCP, to appear, available electronically at http://www.math.osu.edu/~cogdell.1/moish-www.pdf.

  6. Y. Z. Flicker, A Fourier summation formula for the symmetric space GL(n)/GL(n − 1), Compositio Mathematica 88 (1993), 39–117.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. I. M. Gel’fand and D. A. Kazhdan, Representations of the group GL(n,K) where K is a local field, in Lie Groups and their Representations, Wiley, London, 1975, pp. 95–118.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Harris and A. J. Scholl, A note on trilinear forms for reducible representations and Beilinson’s Conjectures, Journal of the European Mathematical Society 3 (2001), 93–104.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. S. S. Kudla, The local Langlands correspondence: the non-Archimedean case, Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics 55, part 2 (1994), 365–391.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. D. Prasad, Trilinear forms for representations of GL(2) and local ɛ-factors, Compositio Mathematica 75 (1990), 1–46.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. D. Prasad, On the decomposition of a representation of GL(3) restricted to GL(2) over a p-adic field, Duke Mathematical Journal 69 (1993), 167–177.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. D. Prasad and A. Raghuram, Representation theory of GL(n) over non-Archimedean local fields in School on Automorphic Forms on GL(n), ICTP Lecture Notes, Vol. 21, 2008, pp. 159–205.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. F. Rodier, Representations de GL(n, k) ou k est un corps p-adique, Seminaire Bourbaki, no. 587 (1982), 201–218.

  14. M. Tadic, Classification of unitary representations in irreducible representations of general linear group (non-Archimedean case), Annales Scientifiques de l”École Normale Supérieure 19 (1986), 335–382.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. J.-L. Waldspurger, Sur les valuers de certaines fonctions L automorphes en leur centre de symetrie, Compositio Mathematica 54 (1985), 173–242.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. T. Wedhorn, The Local Langlands Correspondence for GL(n) over p-adic fields in School on Automorphic Forms on GL(n), ICTP Lecture Notes, Vol. 21, 2008, pp. 237–320.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. A. V. Zelevinsky, Induced representations of reductive p-adic groups II. On irreducible representations of GL(n), Annales Scientifiques de l’École Normale Supérieure 13 (1980), 165–210.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. G. Venketasubramanian.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Venketasubramanian, C.G. On representations of GL(n) distinguished by GL(n − 1) over a p-adic field. Isr. J. Math. 194, 1–44 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11856-012-0152-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11856-012-0152-7

Keywords

Navigation