Skip to main content
Log in

A definable failure of the singular cardinal hypothesis

  • Published:
Israel Journal of Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We show first that it is consistent that κ is a measurable cardinal where the GCH fails, while there is a lightface definable wellorder of H(κ +). Then with further forcing we show that it is consistent that GCH fails at ℵ ω , ℵ ω strong limit, while there is a lightface definable wellorder of H(ℵ ω+1) (“definable failure” of the singular cardinal hypothesis at ℵ ω ). The large cardinal hypothesis used is the existence of a κ ++-strong cardinal, where κ is κ ++-strong if there is an embedding j: VM with critical point κ such that H(κ ++) ⊆ M. By work of M. Gitik and W. J. Mitchell [12], [20], our large cardinal assumption is almost optimal. The techniques of proof include the “tuning-fork” method of [10] and [3], a generalisation to large cardinals of the stationary-coding of [4] and a new “definable-collapse” coding based on mutual stationarity. The fine structure of the canonical inner model L[E] for a κ ++-strong cardinal is used throughout.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. Asperó and S. D. Friedman, Large cardinals and the locally defined well-orders of the universe, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 157 (2009), 1–15.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. J. Cummings, Iterated forcing and elementary embeddings, in Handbook of Set Theory (M. Foreman and A. Kanamori, eds.), Vol. 2, Springer, Berlin, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  3. N. Dobrinen and S. D. Friedman, The consistency strength of the tree property at the double successor of a measurable, Fundamenta Mathematicae 208 (2010), 123–153.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. V. Fischer and S. D. Friedman, Cardinal characteristics and projective wellorders, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 161 (2010), 916–922.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. V. Fischer, S. D. Friedman and L. Zdomskyy, Projective wellorders and MAD families with large continuum, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 162 (2011), 853–862

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Foreman and W. H. Woodin, GCH can fail everywhere, Annals of Mathematics 133 (1991), 1–35.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. S. D. Friedman, Lecture notes on definable wellorders, see http://www.logic.univie.ac.at/~sdf/papers/.

  8. S. D. Friedman and R. Honzik, Easton’s theorem and large cardinals, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 154 (2008), 191–208.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. S. D. Friedman and M. Magidor, The number of normal measures, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 74 (2009), 1069–1080.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. S. D. Friedman and K. Thompson, Perfect trees and elementary embeddings, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 73 (2008), 906–918.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. S. D. Friedman and L. Zdomskyy, Measurable cardinals and the cofinality of the symmetric group, Fundamenta Mathematicae 207 (2010), 101–122.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. M. Gitik, The negation of singular cardinal hypothesis from o(κ) = κ ++, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 43 (1989), 209–234.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Gitik, Prikry-type forcings, in Handbook of Set Theory (M. Foreman and A. Kanamori, eds.), Vol. 2, Springer, Berlin, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  14. L. Harrington, Long projective wellorderings, Annals of Mathematical Logic 12 (1977), 1–24.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. R. Honzik, Global singularization and the failure of SCH, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 161 (2010), 895–915.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. T. Jech, Set theory, Springer, Berlin, 2003.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. A. Kanamori, Perfect-set forcing for uncountable cardinals, Annals of Mathematical Logic 19 (1980), 97–114.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. A. Kanamori, The Higher Infinite, Springer, Berlin, 2003.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. M. Magidor, On the singular cardinals problem I, Israel Journal of Mathematics 28 (1977), 1–31.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. W. J. Mitchell, The core model for sequences of measures. I, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 95 (1984), 229–260.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. W. J. Mitchell and J. R. Steel, Fine structure and iteration trees, Lecture Notes in Logic, Vol. 3, Springer, Berlin, 1994.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. S. Shelah, Proper and Improper Forcing, Springer, Berlin, 1998.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. J. R. Steel and B. Loewe, An introduction to core model theory, Sets and Proofs, London Mathematical Society Lecture Notes, Vol. 258, Cambridge University Press, 1999.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sy-David Friedman.

Additional information

The first author was supported by FWF Project P19898-N18.

The second author was supported by postdoctoral grant of the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic 201/09/P115.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Friedman, SD., Honzik, R. A definable failure of the singular cardinal hypothesis. Isr. J. Math. 192, 719–762 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11856-012-0044-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11856-012-0044-x

Keywords

Navigation