Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Certification of community forestry enterprises: experiences with incorporating community forestry in a global system for forest governance

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Small-scale Forestry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses the history and present status of community forest certification as an illustration of the growing interactions between global and local processes in forest governance. The Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certification system is analyzed as an illustrative case of the trend towards increased incorporation of community-based forest enterprises (CFEs) into international initiatives for sustainable forest management and global markets. First the paper reviews the development of community-based forest management and the evolution in certification of community-based forest enterprises. Next it discusses the main challenges and opportunities for making CFE certification accessible and beneficial for communities. Finally it illustrates the importance of multi-level and multi-actor partnerships for creating effective interfaces between global standards and community forestry practices. The experiences with FSC certification of community-based forest enterprises demonstrate that community forestry is enlarging its scope from autonomous decision-making on local practice to incorporation in international forest governance systems. This experience also demonstrates that the application of global standards for sustainable forest management requires adaptation to local realities. These lessons are of relevance for further incorporation of community forestry in the newly evolving global programs for forest management and conservation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Few of these programs actually implemented market studies or developed business plans for the community enterprises.

  2. The new label option uses the same standard FSC label, but has new label text that identifies the product as from a well managed forest of small or community producers.

References

  • Agrawal A, Chhatre A, Hardin R (2008) Changing governance of the world’s forests. Science 329(5882):1460–1462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold JEM (2001) Forests and people: 25 years of community forestry. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Auld G, Gulbrandsen LH, McDermott CL (2008) Certification schemes and the impacts on forests and forestry. Ann Rev Environ Resour 33:187–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass S (2004) Certification. In: Burley J, Evans J, Youngquist JA (eds) Encyclopedia of forest sciences. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 1350–1357

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Benneker C (2008) Dealing with the state, the market andNGOs. The impact of institutions on the constitution and performance of Community Forest Enterprises (CFE) in the lowlands of Bolivia. Dissertation Wageningen University, The Netherlands

  • Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (2000) Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecol Appl 10(5):1251–1262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butterfield R, Hansen E, Fletcher R, Nikinmaa H (2005) Forest certification and small forest enterprises: key trends and impacts—benefits and barriers. Forest Trends and the Rainforest Alliance, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Cashore B, Auld G, Newson D (2004) Governance through markets—forest certification and the emergence of non-state authority. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Cashore B, Gale F, Meidinger E, Newson D (2006) Confronting sustainability: forest certification in developing and transitioning countries. Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Publication Series, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Challinor D, Frondorf MH (eds) (1991) Social forestry. Communal and private management strategies compared. Paul H. Mitze School of Advanced International Studies, John Hopkins University, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers R, Saxena NC, Shah T (1989) To the hands of the poor; water and trees. Oxford & IBH Publishing Co., New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnley S, Poe MR (2007) Community forestry in theory and practice: where are we now. Ann Rev Anthropol 36:301–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colchester M (2008) Beyond tenure: rights-based approaches to peoples and forests. Some lessons from the forests peoples programme. Rights and Resources Initiative, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Conroy M (2008) Branded! How the ‘certification revolution’ is transforming global corporations. New Society Publishers, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Crow S, Danks C (2010) Why certify? Motivations, outcomes and the importance of facilitating organizations in certification of community-based forestry initiatives. Small-Scale Forestry 9(2):195–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Koning J (2011) Reshaping institutions. Bricolage processes in smallholder forestry in the Amazon. Dissertation, Wageningen University, The Netherlands

  • De Pourq K, Thomas E, Van Damme P (2009) Indigenous community-based forestry in the Bolivian lowlands: some basic challenges for certification. Int For Rev 11(1):12–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Donovan RZ (2000) Observations on equity after ten years of Smartwood certification. Paper presented at second annual FSC conference. Forest Stewardship Council, Oaxaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden S (2009) The work of environmental governance networks: traceability, credibility and certification by the Forest Stewardship Council. Geoforum 40(3):383–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ezzine de Bas D, Perez MR, Sayer JA, Lescuyer G, Nasi R, Karsenty (2009) External influences on and conditions for community logging management in Cameroon. World Dev 37(2):445–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca SA (2006) Forest certification in Mexico. In: Cashore B, Gale F, Meidinger E, Newsom D (eds) Confronting sustainability: forest certification in developing and transitioning countries. Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies Publication Series, New Haven, pp 407–434

    Google Scholar 

  • FSC (2003) FSC social strategy: building and implementing a social agenda version 2.1. http://www.fsc.org/slimf/docs/Small an low intensity managed forest a progress report.pdf. Accessed 21 Jan 2011

  • FSC (2007) Strengthening forest conservation, communities and markets. The Global Strategy of the FSC. Forest Stewardship Council A.C., Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • FSC (2010) Global FSC certificates: type and distribution. December 2010. http://www.fsc.org/facts-figures.html. Accessed 21 Jan 2011

  • Gerez-Fernández P, Alatorre-Guzmán E (2005) Challenges for forest certification and community forestry in Mexico. In: Bray DB, Merino-Pérez L, Barry D (eds) The community forests of Mexico: managing for sustainable landscapes. University of Texas Press, Austin, pp 71–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Higman S, Nussbaum R (2002) Getting small forest enterprises into certification: how standards constrain the certification of small forest enterprises. Proforest, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys D (1999) The evolving forest regime. Global Environ Change 9(3):251–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys D (2008) The politics of ‘avoided deforestation’: historical context and contemporary issues. Int For Rev 10(3):433–442

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphries S, Kainer K (2006) Local perceptions of forest certification for community-based enterprises. For Ecol Manag 235(1–3):30–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irvine D (1999) Certification and community forestry: current trends, challenges and potential. Background Paper World Bank/WWF Alliance Workshop on Independent Certification, Washington DC, November 9–10, 1999

  • Klooster D (2004) The intangible benefits of forest certification in Mexico: fame, discipline and hope. Paper IASCP biennial conference, Oaxaca, Mexico, August 9–13, 2004

  • Klooster D (2005) Environmental certification of forests: the evolution of environmental governance in a commodity network. J Rural Stud 21(4):403–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson AM, Soto F (2008) Decentralization of natural resource governance regimes. Ann Rev Environ Resour 33:213–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markopoulos M (2003) The role of certification in community-based forest enterprise. In: Meidinger E, Elliott C, Oesten G (eds) Social and political dimensions of forest certification. Verlag Remagen-Oberwinter, Germany, pp 105–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayers J, Bass S (1999) Policy that works for forest and people: series overview. Policy that works for forests and people series No. 7, International Institute for Environment and Development, London

  • McQueen D, Dufey A et al (2008) Distinguishing community forest products in the market: industrial demand for a mechanism that brings together forest certification and fair trade. International Institute for Environment and Development, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Molnar A (2003) Forest certification and communities: looking forward to the next decade. Forest Trends, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Molnar A (2004) Forest certification and communities. Int For Rev 6(2):173–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray Li T (2007) Practices of assemblage and community forest management. Econ Soc 36(2):263–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozinga S (2004) Footprints in the forest: current practice and future challenge in forest certification. FERN, Moreton in Marsh

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez N, Arboleda MO (2008) SLIMFs evaluation preliminary results. Workshop on the certification of community-based and small forest operations, Lisbon, Portugal. Forest Stewardship Council, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribot JC, Agrawal A, Larson AM (2006) Recentralizing while decentralizing: how national governments reappropriate forest resources. World Dev 34(11):1864–1886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rickenbach M, Overdevest C (2006) More than markets: assessing Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certification as a policy tool. J For 104(3):143

    Google Scholar 

  • Ros-Tonen MAF (ed) (2006) Partnerships in sustainable forest resource management. Learning from Latin America. Brill Publishers, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherr SJ, White A, Kaimowitz D (2003) Making markets work for forest communities. Int For Rev 5(1):67–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheil D, Wunder S (2002) The value of tropical forest to local communities: complications, caveats, and cautions. Conserv Ecol 6(2):9. http://www.consecol.org/vol6/iss2/art9. Accessed 21 Jan 2011

  • Shrestha K, Khanal PN (2004) Forest certification. Experiences from Parbat District. Report Seed Tree Nepal, Integrated Human Ecology project Parbat and UNDP/GEF Small Grants Programme, Katmandu, Nepal, SGP Publication 01/2004

  • Stewart J, Higman S, Brown L, Robinson D, Peachey V (2003) Increasing the contribution of forest certification to sustainable rural livelihoods. Paper international conference on rural livelihoods, forests and biodiversity, Bonn, Germany, May 19–23, 2003

  • Sunderlin W, Hatcher J, Liddle M (2008) From exclusion to ownership? Challenges and opportunities in advancing forest tenure reforms. Rights and Resources Initiative, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor PL (2005) A fair trade approach to community forest certification? A framework for discussion. J Rural Stud 21(4):433–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornber K (2003) Certification: a discussion of equity issues. In: Meidinger E, Elliott C, Oesten G (eds) Social and political dimensions of forest certification. Verlag Remagen-Oberwinter, Germany, pp 63–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornber K, Markopoulos D (2000) Certification: its impacts and prospects for community forests, stakeholders and markets. Report International Institute for Environment and development, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollefson C, Gale F, Haley D (2008) Setting the standard—certification, governance, and the Forest Stewardship Council. UBC Press, Vancouver

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiersum KF (2009) Community forestry between local autonomy and global encapsulation: quo vadis with environmental and climate change payments? Paper first community forestry international workshop ‘thinking globally—acting locally: community forestry in the international arena’ Pokhara, Nepal, September 15–18, 2009. On line http://edepot.wur.nl/157269. Accessed 21 Jan 2011

  • Wiersum KF, Shrestha K (2010) Biocultural diversity in community forestry in Nepal. ETFRN News 51:20–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Wollenberg E, Ingles A (1998) Incomes from the forest. Methods for the development and conservation of forest products for local communities. CIFOR, Bogor

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. F. Wiersum.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wiersum, K.F., Humphries, S. & van Bommel, S. Certification of community forestry enterprises: experiences with incorporating community forestry in a global system for forest governance. Small-scale Forestry 12, 15–31 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-011-9190-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-011-9190-y

Keywords

Navigation