Abstract
Graphene has superior mechanical properties, and previous studies have shown that it can be used as a fiber laminate in metal-graphene nanocomposites. Our research outlines the advantages and disadvantages of different Ni-graphene nanocomposite laminates. Using molecular dynamics, Ni-graphene nanocomposites are studied under mode I loading normal to the graphene laminate plane. The stress intensity factor (\(K_{\text{I}}\)) is predicted for the nanocomposite at varying distances between a simulated crack and the graphene sheet(s) in the Ni-matrix. We find that \(K_{\text{I}}\) of the Ni-matrix is reduced with the addition of graphene sheet. However, for a single graphene sheet in the Ni-matrix, \(K_{\text{I}}\) increases with increased spacing between the crack and the graphene sheet. This is due to the change in the crack-generated stress field in the region between the Ni-matrix containing the crack and the graphene sheet, which leads to the lower stress values at which dislocation nucleation occurs compared to single-crystal Ni. For multiple layers of graphene sheets in the Ni-matrix, we find that failure occurs exclusively by delamination at a lower stress than the one-layer case. This research concludes that fabricated Ni-graphene nanocomposites can be tuned for optimal fracture strength by the structural arrangement of graphene sheets within the Ni-matrix.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
K.S. Novoselov, A.K. Geim, S.V. Morozov, D. Jiang, Y. Zhang, S.V. Dubonos, I.V. Grigorieva, and A.A. Firsov, Science 306, 666 (2004).
Y. Kim, J. Lee, M.S. Yeom, J.W. Shin, H. Kim, Y. Cui, J.W. Kysar, J. Hone, Y. Jung, S. Jeon, and S.M. Han, Nat. Commun. 4, 2114 (2013).
I.A. Ovid’ko, Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci. 38, 190 (2014).
Y. Hernandez, Nat. Nanotechnol. 3, 563 (2008).
P. Blake, Nano Lett. 8, 1704 (2008).
H.C. Schniepp, J. Phys. Chem. B 110, 8535 (2006).
X. Li, W. Cai, J. An, S. Kim, J. Nah, D. Yang, R. Piner, A. Velamakanni, I. Jung, E. Tutuc, S.K. Banerjee, L. Colombo, and R.S. Ruoff, Science 324, 1312 (2009).
S. Bae, Nat. Nanotechnol. 5, 574 (2010).
S.W. Chang, A.K. Nair, and M.J. Buehler, Philos. Magn. Lett. 93, 196 (2013).
A.K. Geim, Science 324, 1530 (2009).
A.K. Geim and K.S. Novoselov, Nat. Mater. 6, 183 (2007).
Z.P. Xu and M.J. Buehler, J. Phys. 22, 485301 (2010).
M. Fuentes-Cabrera, M.I. Baskes, A.V. Melechko, and M.L. Simpson, Phys. Rev. B 77, 035405 (2008).
C.H. Ersland, I.R. Vatne, and C. Thaulow, Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. 20, 075004 (2012).
M.S. Daw and M.I. Baskes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1285 (1983).
S.J. Stuart, A.B. Tutein, and J.A. Harrison, J. Chem. Phys. 112, 6472 (2000).
L. Bardotti, P. Jensen, A. Hoareau, M. Treilleux, and B. Cabaud, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4694 (1995).
S.P. Huang, D.S. Mainardi, and P.B. Balbuena, Surf. Sci. 545, 163 (2003).
S. Plimpton, J. Comput. Phys. 117, 1 (1995).
A.P. Thompson, S.J. Plimpton, and W. Mattson, J. Chem. Phys. 131, 154107 (2009).
Z. Qin and M.J. Buehler, J. Phys. D 45, 445302 (2012).
A. Stukowski, Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. 18, 015012 (2010).
S.W. Chang, A.K. Nair, and M.J. Buehler, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 24, 245301 (2012).
R.J. Young, I.A. Kinloch, L. Gong, and K.S. Novoselov, Compos. Sci. Technol. 72, 1459 (2012).
Acknowledgements
A.K.N. and S.E.M. acknowledge support from the Arkansas Economic Development Commission (#16-EPS3-0001). This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation, under Grants ARI#0963249, MRI#0959124, and EPS#0918970, and by a Grant from the Arkansas Science and Technology Authority, managed by the Arkansas High Performance Computing Center.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Muller, S.E., Nair, A.K. Dislocation Nucleation in Nickel-Graphene Nanocomposites Under Mode I Loading. JOM 68, 1909–1914 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-016-1941-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-016-1941-y