Abstract
Coal combustion emits large amounts of elemental mercury that cannot be captured by air pollution control devices such as flue gas desulfurization because of its insolubility. Therefore, technological advances are necessary for capturing elemental mercury. We conducted various tests on adsorption of elemental mercury using KI-, HCl-, and S-impregnated activated carbons, which were compared with virgin activated carbon. Tests with virgin activated carbon revealed that the optimal adsorption temperature for capturing elemental mercury was 363 K. The adsorption efficiency for elemental mercury was nearly 100% using activated carbon impregnated with 1% and 5% KI and 1%, 5%, and 10% HCl. Through kinetic analyses of the impregnated activated carbons, the optimal equilibrium adsorption capacities of KI-, HCl-, and S-impregnated activated carbons for mercury were determined to be 333.3, 333.3, and 256.4mg/g, respectively, by using a pseudo second-order kinetic model.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
N. Pirrone and R. Mason, Mercury fate and transport in the global atmosphere (2009).
US Environmental Protection Agency, Mercury study report to congress (1997).
US Environmental Protection Agency, Control mercury emissions from coal fired electric utility boilers (2005).
US Environmental Protection Agency, Preliminary estimates of performance and cost of mercury emission control technology applications on electric utility boilers (2004).
J. H. Pavlish, E. A. Sondreal, M.D. Mann, E. S. Olson, K. C. Galbreath, D. L. Laudal and S. A. Benson, Fuel Processing Technol., 82, 89 (2003).
S. J. Lee, Y.C. Seo, J. Jurng and T.G. Lee, Atmospheric Environ., 38, 4887 (2004).
J. Jurng, T.G. Lee, G.W. Lee, S. J. Lee, B.H. Kim and J. Seier, Chemosphere, 47, 907 (2002).
A. Saha, Energy Fuels, 28, 4021 (2014).
H.Y. Pan, R.G. Minet, S.W. Benson and T.T. Tsotsis, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 33, 2996 (1994).
W. Du, L. Yin, Y. Zhuo, Q. Xu, L. Zhang and C. Chen, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 53, 582 (2014).
J. Cai, B. Shen, Z. Li, J. Chen and C. He, Chem. Eng. J., 241, 19 (2014).
B. Shen, J. Chen and S. Yue, Micropor. Mesopor. Mater., 203, 216 (2015).
H.C. His, M. J. Rood, M.R. Abadi, S. Chen and R. Chang, J. Environ. Eng., 128, 1080 (2002).
Y. S. Ho and G. McKAY, Trans Institution Chem. Engineers, 76, Part B (1998).
K.V. Kumar, J. Hazard. Mater., 137, 1538 (2006).
G. Skodras, I. Diamantopoulou, G. Pantoleontos and G. P. Sakellaropoulos, Materials, 158, 1 (2009).
N. Asasian, T. Kaghazchi, A. Faramarzi, A. H. Siboni, R.A. Kesheh, M. Kavand and S-.A. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 1588 (2014).
F. Raji and M. Pakizeh, Appl. Surf. Sci., 301, 568 (2014).
L. Cui, X. Guo, Q. Wei, Y. Wang, L. Gao, L. Yan, T. Yan and B. Du, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 439, 112 (2015).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jang, HN., Back, SK., Sung, JH. et al. Adsorption and kinetics of elemental mercury vapor on activated carbons impregnated with potassium iodide, hydrogen chloride, and sulfur. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 34, 806–813 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-016-0305-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-016-0305-1