Skip to main content
Log in

A Reduction Theorem for the Kripke–Joyal Semantics: Forcing Over an Arbitrary Category can Always be Replaced by Forcing Over a Complete Heyting Algebra

  • Published:
Logica Universalis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is assumed that a Kripke–Joyal semantics \({\mathcal{A} = \left\langle \mathbb{C},{\rm Cov}, {\it F},\Vdash \right\rangle}\) has been defined for a first-order language \({\mathcal{L}}\). To transform \({\mathbb{C}}\) into a Heyting algebra \({\overline{\mathbb{C}}}\) on which the forcing relation is preserved, a standard construction is used to obtain a complete Heyting algebra made up of cribles of \({\mathbb{C}}\). A pretopology \({\overline{{\rm Cov}}}\) is defined on \({\overline{\mathbb{C}}}\) using the pretopology on \({\mathbb{C}}\). A sheaf \({\overline{{\it F}}}\) is made up of sections of F that obey functoriality. A forcing relation \({\overline{\Vdash}}\) is defined and it is shown that \({\overline{\mathcal{A}} = \left\langle \overline{\mathbb{C}},\overline{\rm{Cov}},\overline{{\it F}}, \overline{\Vdash} \right\rangle }\) is a Kripke–Joyal semantics that faithfully preserves the notion of forcing of \({\mathcal{A}}\). That is to say, an object a of \({\mathbb{C}Ob}\) forces a sentence with respect to \({\mathcal{A}}\) if and only if the maximal a-crible forces it with respect to \({\overline{\mathcal{A}}}\). This reduces a Kripke–Joyal semantics defined over an arbitrary site to a Kripke–Joyal semantics defined over a site which is based on a complete Heyting algebra.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goldblatt, R.: Topoi: the Categorial Analysis of Logic, Volume 98 of Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, New York, Oxford (1979)

  2. Kock, A., Reyes, G.E.: Doctrines in categorical logic. In: Barwise, J. (ed.) Handbook of Mathematical Logic, from the series Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, pp. 283–313. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, New York, Oxford (1977)

  3. Grayson R.J.: Forcing in intuitionistic systems without power-set. J. Symbolic Logic 48(3), 670–682 (1983)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Ščedrov, A.: Forcing and Classifying Topoi, Number 295 of Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society. American Mathematical Society, Providence (1984)

  5. Lambek J., Scott P.J.: Introduction to Higher Order Categorical Logic, Number 7 in the series Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mac Lane S., Moerdijk I.: Sheaves in Geometry and Logic: A First Introduction to Topos Theory. Springer, New York (1992)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Huber-Dyson V.: Gödel’s Theorems: A Workbook on Formalization. B.G. Teubner Verlagsgesellschaft, Stuttgart (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Barušs, I.: An Examination of Cohen’s Forcing in a Topos-Theoretic Framework. Master’s Thesis, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Imants Barušs.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barušs, I., Woodrow, R. A Reduction Theorem for the Kripke–Joyal Semantics: Forcing Over an Arbitrary Category can Always be Replaced by Forcing Over a Complete Heyting Algebra. Log. Univers. 7, 323–334 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-013-0084-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-013-0084-y

Mathematics Subject Classification (2010)

Keywords

Navigation