Skip to main content
Log in

A variation pixels identification method based on kernel spatial attraction model and local entropy for robust endmember extraction

  • Mechanical Engineering, Control Science and Information Engineering
  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A variation pixels identification method was proposed aiming at depressing the effect of variation pixels, which dilates the theoretical hyperspectral data simplex and misguides volume evaluation of the simplex. With integration of both spatial and spectral information, this method quantitatively defines a variation index for every pixel. The variation index is proportional to pixels local entropy but inversely proportional to pixels kernel spatial attraction. The number of pixels removed was modulated by an artificial threshold factor a. Two real hyperspectral data sets were employed to examine the endmember extraction results. The reconstruction errors of preprocessing data as opposed to the result of original data were compared. The experimental results show that the number of distinct endmembers extracted has increased and the reconstruction error is greatly reduced. 100% is an optional value for the threshold factor a when dealing with no prior knowledge hyperspectral data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. CHANG C I. Hyperspectral data processing algorithm design and analysis [M]. USA, New York: John Wiley and Sons, 2013: 201–206.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. CHANG C I, PLAZA A. A fast iterative algorithm for implementation of pixel purity index [J]. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2006, 3(1): 63–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. GRUNINGER J H, RATKOWSKI A J, HOKE M L. The sequential maximum angle convex cone (SMACC) endmember model [C]// Algorithms for Multispectral, Hyperspectral and Ultra-spectral Imagery. USA, Washington: SPIE, 2004: 3885–3895.

    Google Scholar 

  4. HARSANYI J C, CHANG C I. Hyperspectral image classification and dimensionality reduction: An orthogonal subspace projection approach [J]. Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1994, 32(4): 779–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. NASCIMENTO J M, BIOUCAS-DIAS J M. Vertex component analysis: A fast algorithm to unmix hyperspectral data [J]. Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2005, 43(4): 898–910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. WINTER M E. N-FINDR: An algorithm for fast autonomous spectral end-member determination in hyperspectral data [C]// Imaging Spectrometry V. Denver, USA: SPIE, 1999: 266–275.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. IORDACHE M D, BIOUCAS-DIAS J M, PLAZA A. Sparse unmixing of hyperspectral data [J]. Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2011, 49(6): 2014–2039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. MIAO Li-dan, QI Hai-rong. Endmember extraction from highly mixed data using minimum volume constrained nonnegative matrix factorization [J]. Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2007, 45(3): 765–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. MOUSSAOUI S, HAUKSDOTTIR H, SCHMIDT F, JUTTEN C, CHANUSSOT J, BRIE D, DOUTE S. On the decomposition of Mars hyperspectral data by ICA and Bayesian positive source separation [J]. Neurocomputing, 2008, 71(10/11/12): 2194–2208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. CHANG C I, WU C C, LO C S, CHANG M L. Real-time simplex growing algorithms for hyperspectral endmember extraction [J]. Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2010, 48(4): 1834–1850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. HEINZ D C, CHANG C I. Real-time processing of an unsupervised constrained linear spectral unmixing algorithm [C]// International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Piscataway, USA: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc, 2001: 372–374.

    Google Scholar 

  12. SOMERS B, ASNER G P, TITS L, COPPIN P. Endmember variability in spectral mixture analysis: A review [J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2011, 115(7): 1603–1616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. KESHAVA N, MUSTARD J F. Spectral unmixing [J]. Signal Processing Magazine, 2002, 19(1): 44–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. CHANG C I, WU C C, LIU W M, OUYANG Y C. A new growing method for simplex-based endmember extraction algorithm [J]. Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2006, 44(10): 2804–2819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. PLAZA A, MARTINEZ P, PÉREZ R, PLAZA J. Spatial/spectral endmember extraction by multidimensional morphological operations [J]. Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2002, 40(9): 2025–2041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. LIU Jun-ming, ZHANG Jiang-she. A new maximum simplex volume method based on householder transformation for endmember extraction [J]. IEEE Transaction on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2012, 50(1): 104–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. REZAEI Y, MOBASHERI M R, ZOEJ M J V, SCHAEPMAN M E. Endmember extraction using a combination of orthogonal projection and genetic algorithm [J]. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2012, 9(2): 161–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. CHANG C I, WU C C, TSAI C T. Random N-Finder (N-FINDR) endmember extraction algorithms for hyperspectral imagery [J]. Image Processing, 2011, 20(3): 641–656.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. CALLICO G M, LOPEZ S, AGUILAR B, LOPEZ J F, SARMIENTO R. Parallel implementation of the modified vertex component analysis algorithm for hyperspectral unmixing using OpenCL [J]. Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2014, 7(8): 3650–3659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. ZHANG J K, RIVARD B, SÁNCHEZ-AZOFEIFA A, CASTROESAU K. Intra-and inter-class spectral variability of tropical tree species at La Selva, Costa Rica: Implications for species identification using HYDICE imagery [J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2006, 105(2): 129–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. ZARE A, HO K C. Endmember variability in hyperspectral analysis: addressing spectral variability during spectral unmixing [J]. Signal Processing Magazine, 2014, 31(1): 95–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. ROBERTS D A, GARDNER M, CHURCH R, USTIN S, SCHEER G, GREEN R O. Mapping chaparral in the Santa Monica mountains using multiple endmember spectral mixture models [J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1998, 65(3): 267–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. ASNER G, BUSTAMANTE M, TOWNSEND A. Scale dependence of biophysical structure in deforested areas bordering the Tapajs national forest [J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2003, 87(4): 507–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. BATESON C A, ASNER G P, WESSMAN C A. Endmember bundles: A new approach to incorporating endmember variability into spectral mixture analysis [J]. Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2000, 38(2): 1083–1093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. JIN Jing, WANG Bin, ZHANG Li-ming. A novel approach based on fisher discriminant null space for decomposition of mixed pixels in hyperspectral imagery [J]. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2010, 7(4): 699–703.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. MIANJI F A, ZHANG Y. SVM-based unmixing-to-classification conversion for hyperspectral abundance quantification [J]. Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2011, 49(11): 4318–4327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. CASTRODAD A, XING Z M, GREER J B, BOSCH E, CARIN L, SAPIRO G. Learning discriminative sparse representations for modeling, source separation, and mapping of hyperspectral imagery [J]. Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2011, 49(11): 4263–4281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. MARTÍN G, PLAZA A. Spatial-spectral preprocessing prior to endmember identification and unmixing of remotely sensed hyperspectral data [J]. Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2012, 5(2): 380–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. ZORTEA M, PLAZA A. Spatial preprocessing for endmember extraction [J]. Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2009, 47(8): 2679–2693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. ZORTEA M, PLAZA A. Spatial-spectral endmember extraction from remotely sensed hyperspectral images using the watershed transformation [C]// Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Piscataway, USA: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc, 2010: 963–966.

    Google Scholar 

  31. LOPEZ S, MOURE J F, PLAZA A, CALLICO G M, LOPEZ J F, SARMIENTO R. A new preprocessing technique for fast hyperspectral endmember extraction [J]. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2013, 10(5): 1070–1074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. MERTENS K C, BASETS B D, VERBEKE L P C, WULF R R D. A sub-pixel mapping algorithm based on sub-pixel/pixel spatial attraction models [J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2006, 27(15): 3293–3310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. BEZDEK J C. Cluster validity with fuzzy sets [J]. Journal of Cybernetics, 1973, 3(3): 58–73.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. CHANG C I, DU Q. Estimation of number of spectrally distinct signal sources in hyperspectral imagery [J]. Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2004, 42(3): 608–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chun-hui Zhao  (赵春晖).

Additional information

Foundation item: Projects(61571145, 61405041) supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China; Project(2014M551221) supported by the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, China; Project(LBH-Z13057) supported by the Heilongjiang Postdoctoral Science Found, China; Project(ZD201216) supported by the Key Program of Heilongjiang Natural Science Foundation, China; Project(RC2013XK009003) supported by the Program of Excellent Academic Leaders of Harbin, China; Project(HEUCF1508) supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, Ch., Tian, Mh., Qi, B. et al. A variation pixels identification method based on kernel spatial attraction model and local entropy for robust endmember extraction. J. Cent. South Univ. 23, 1990–2000 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-016-3256-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-016-3256-0

Key words

Navigation