Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling of spatial distributions of farmland density and its temporal change using geographically weighted regression model

  • Published:
Chinese Geographical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study used spatial autoregression (SAR) model and geographically weighted regression (GWR) model to model the spatial patterns of farmland density and its temporal change in Gucheng County, Hubei Province, China in 1999 and 2009, and discussed the difference between global and local spatial autocorrelations in terms of spatial heterogeneity and non-stationarity. Results showed that strong spatial positive correlations existed in the spatial distributions of farmland density, its temporal change and the driving factors, and the coefficients of spatial autocorrelations decreased as the spatial lag distance increased. SAR models revealed the global spatial relations between dependent and independent variables, while the GWR model showed the spatially varying fitting degree and local weighting coefficients of driving factors and farmland indices (i.e., farmland density and temporal change). The GWR model has smooth process when constructing the farmland spatial model. The coefficients of GWR model can show the accurate influence degrees of different driving factors on the farmland at different geographical locations. The performance indices of GWR model showed that GWR model produced more accurate simulation results than other models at different times, and the improvement precision of GWR model was obvious. The global and local farmland models used in this study showed different characteristics in the spatial distributions of farmland indices at different scales, which may provide the theoretical basis for farmland protection from the influence of different driving factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anselin L, 1980. Estimation methods for spatial autoregressive structures. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70(349): 120–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai Shuying, Zhang Shuwen, Zhang Yangzhen, 2007. Digital rebuilding of LUCC spatial-temporal distribution of the last 100 years: Taking Dorbod Mongolian Autonomous County in Daqing City as an example. Acta Geographica Sinica, 62(4): 427–436. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunsdon C, Fotheringham A S, Charlton M E, 1996. Geographically weighted regression: A method for exploring spatial nonstationarity. Geographical Analysis, 28(4): 281–298. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1996.tb00936.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunsdon C, Fotheringham A, Charlton M, 2002. Geographically weighted summary statistics—A framework for localised exploratory data analysis. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 26(6): 501–524. doi: 10.1016/S0198-9715(01)00009-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Youqi, Yang Peng, 2001. Recent progresses of international study on land use and land cover change. Economic Geography, 21(1): 95–100. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Claessensa L, Schoorla J M, Verburga P H et al., 2009. Modelling interactions and feedback mechanisms between land use change and landscape processes. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 129(1–3): 157–170. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2008.08.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erik L, Cheng D, 2008. Assessing farmland protection policy in China. Land Use Policy, 25(1): 59–68. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2006.01.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fotheringham A S, Brunsdon C, Charlton M, 2002. Geographically Weighted Regression: The Analysis of Spatially Varying Relationships. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao Zhiqiang, Yi Wei, 2012. Land use change in China and analysis of its driving forces using CLUE-S and Dinamica EGO model. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 28(16): 208–216. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene R P, 1997. The farmland conversion process in a polynucleated metropolis. Landscape and Urban Planning, 36(4): 291–300. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(96)00360-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guan D J, Gao W J, Wateri K, 2008. Land use change of Kitakyushu based on landscape ecology and Markov model. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 18(4): 455–468. doi: 10.1007/s11442-008-0455-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris P, Fotheringham A S, Crespo R et al., 2011. The use of Geographically Weighted Regression for spatial prediction: An evaluation of models using simulated data sets. Math Geosciences, 43(6): 657–680. doi: 10.1007/s11004-011-9323-z

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang C J, Tang Z Q, Zhou Q S et al., 2011. Application of improved error GM (1, 1) model on predicting of cultivated land in Yiyang. Energy Procedia, 5: 1172–1176. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.03.205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurvich C M, Simonoff J S, Tsai C L, 1998. Smoothing parameter selection in nonparametric regression using an improved Akaike information criterion. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 60(2): 271–293. doi: 10.1111/1467-9868.00125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey H D, Barry J B, John C B et al., 2008. Searching for farmland preservation markets: Evidence from the Southeastern U.S. Land Use Policy, 26(1): 121–129. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.02.011

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Qunóu, Deng Xiangzheng, Lin Yingzhi, 2010. Impacts of cultivated land conversion on cultivated land productivity in China: Prediction and analysis. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 21(12): 3113–3119. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jun T, 2011. Spatially varying relationships between land use and water quality across an urbanization gradient explored by geographically weighted regression. Applied Geography, 31(1): 376–392. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.08.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulldorff M, 1998. Statistical methods for spatial epidemiology: Tests for randomness. In: Gatrell A and Løytønen M (eds). GIS and Health for Europe. London: Taylor & Francis, 49–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambin E, Rounsevell M, Geist H, 2000. Are agricultural land-use models able to predict changes in land-use intensity? Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 82(1–3): 321–331. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(00)00235-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X Y, Zhang S W, Wang Z M et al., 2004. Spatial variability and pattern analysis of soil properties in Dehui City of Jilin Province. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 14(4): 503–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pijanowski B C, Brown D G, Shellito B A, 2002. Using neural networks and GIS to forecast land use changes: A land transformation model. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 26(6): 553–575. doi: 10.1016/S0198-9715(01)00015-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu Bingwen, Wang Qinmin, Chen Chongcheng, 2007. Spatial autocorrelation analysis of multi-scale land use in Fujian province. Journal of Natural Resources, 22(2): 311–321. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford V P, 2011. Global and local analysis of fragmentation in a mountain region of Colorado. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 101(2–3): 207–218. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2003.09.005

    Google Scholar 

  • Su Y F, Foody G M, Cheng K S, 2012. Spatial non-stationarity in the relationships between land cover and surface temperature in an urban heat island and its impacts on thermally sensitive populations. Landscape and Urban Planning, 107(02): 172–180. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.05.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szymanowski M, Kryza M, 2011. Application of geographically weighted regression for modelling the spatial structure of urban heat island in the city of Wroclaw (SW Poland). Procedia Environmental Sciences, 3: 87–92. doi: 10.1016/j.proenv.2011.02.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobler W R, 1970. A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography, 46(4): 234–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Xiaoqin, Wang Qinmin, Li Huiguo, 2008. Spatial pattern of LUCC in different micro-geomorphic types of Huanghe River Delta. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 28(4): 513–517. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y J, Cheng H, Edwards R L et al., 2001. A high-resolution absolute-dated late pleistocene monsoon record from Hulu Cave, China. Science, 294(5550): 2345–2348. doi: 10.1126/science.1064618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiangfan Statistical Bureau, 2000; 2010. Xiangfan Statistical Yearbook (1999; 2009). Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie Hualin, Liu Liming, Li Bo, 2006. Spatial autocorrelation analysis of multi-scale land-use changes: A case study in Ongniud Banner, Inner Mongolia. Acta Geographica Sinica, 61(4): 389–400. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu Jianbo, Song Lisheng, Xia Zhen et al., 2012. Spatial variability of available phosphorus for cultivated soil based on GARBF neural network. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 28(16): 158–165. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Likai, Meng Jijun, 2009. Advance in and tendencies of land use and cover change model. Progress in Geography, 28(5): 782–790. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Long Guo.

Additional information

Foundation item: Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 40601073, 41101192, 41201571), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 2011PY112, 2011QC041, 2011QC091), Huazhong Agricultural University Scientific & Technological Self-innovation Foundation (No. 2011SC21)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, H., Guo, L., Chen, J. et al. Modeling of spatial distributions of farmland density and its temporal change using geographically weighted regression model. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 24, 191–204 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-013-0631-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-013-0631-8

Keywords

Navigation