Abstract
This research examines whether preference for certain price presentations observed in past research could be explained by either consumers’ math anxiety or their math abilities. Previous research suggests that math anxiety not only increases tendencies to make computational errors but also influences cognitive abilities to make numerical judgments. In four studies we document an effect of math anxiety whereby price promotions, whose net prices are simply derived, like those in a dollars-off format, were preferred over a competing percentage-off format. We explain this effect in terms of consumers’ inability to expend cognitive resources due to their math anxiety rather than their math ability. We also identify a boundary condition with such effects of math anxiety occurring when price information is presented in a computationally complex manner and when consumers are making important product judgments.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander, L., & Martray, C. (1989). The development of an abbreviated version of the mathematics anxiety rating scale. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 22, 143–150.
Ashcraft, M. H., & Kirk, E. P. (2001). The relationships among working memory, mathematics anxiety, and performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 130, 224–237.
Ashcraft, M. H., & Moore, A. M. (2009). Mathematics anxiety and the affective drop in performance. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 27, 197–205.
Bagozzi, R. P., Baumgartner, H., & Yi, Y. (1992). State versus action orientation and the theory of reasoned action: An application to coupon usage. Journal of Consumer Research, 18, 505–518.
Beilock, S. L., & Carr, T. H. (2005). When high-powered people fail: Working memory and 'choking under pressure' in math. Psychological Science, 16, 101–105.
Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Kao, C. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306–307.
Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford Press.
Chen, H., & Rao, A. R. (2007). When two plus two is not equal to four: Errors in processing multiple percentage changes. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 327–340.
Chen, S., Monroe, K. B., & Lou, Y. (1998). The effects of framing price promotion messages on consumers' perceptions and purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing, 74, 353–372.
Compeau, L. D., & Grewal, D. (1998). Comparative price advertising: An integrative review. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 17, 257–273.
Compeau, L. D., Grewal, D., & Chandrashekaran, R. (2002). Comparative price advertising: Believe it or not. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 36, 284–294.
Dehaene, S., Spelke, F., Pinel, P., Stanescu, R., & Tviskin, S. (1999). Sources of mathematical thinking, behavioral and brain-imaging evidence. Science, 284, 970–974.
Delazer, M., Domahs, F., Bartha, L., Brenneis, C., Lochy, A., Trieb, T., & Benke, T. (2003). Learning complex arithmetic—an fMRI study. Cognitive Brain Research, 18, 76–88.
Della Bitta, A. J., Monroe, K. B., & McGinnis, J. M. (1981). Consumer perceptions of comparative price advertisements. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 416–427.
DelVecchio, D., Krishnan, S. H., & Smith, D. C. (2007). Cents or percent? The effects of promotion framing on price expectations and choice. Journal of Marketing, 71, 158–170.
DeYoung, C. G., Shamosh, N. A., Green, A. E., Braver, T. S., & Gray, J. R. (2009). Intellect as distinct from openness: Differences revealed by fMRI of working memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 883–892.
Fitzsimons, G. J. (2008). Editorial: Death to dichotomizing. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 5–8.
Furst, A., & Hitch, G. J. (2000). Separate roles for executive and phonological components of working memory in mental arithmetic. Memory & Cognition, 28, 774–782.
Grewal, D., Marmorstein, H., & Sharma, A. (1996). Communicating price information through semantic cues: The moderating effects of situation and discount size. Journal of Consumer Research, 23, 148–155.
Hecht, S. A. (2002). Counting on working memory in simple arithmetic when counting is used for problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 30, 447–455.
Hembree, R. (1990). The nature, effects, and relief of mathematics anxiety. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21, 33–46.
Hendel, D. D. (1980). Experimental and affective correlates of math anxiety in adult women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5, 219–230.
Hopko, D. R., McNeil, D. W., Lejuez, C. W., Ashcraft, M. H., Eifert, G. H., & Riel, J. (2003). The effects of anxious responding on mental arithmetic and lexical decision task performance. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 17, 647–665.
Inman, J. J., McAlister, L., & Hoyer, W. D. (1990). Promotion signal: Proxy for a price cut? Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 9–17.
Krishna, A., Briesch, R., Lehmann, D. R., & Yuan, H. (2002). A meta-analysis of the impact of price presentation on perceived savings. Journal of Retailing, 78, 101–118.
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: Springer.
LeFevre, J., DeStefano, D. D., Coleman, B., & Shanahan, T. (2005). Mathematical cognition and working memory. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), Handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 361–378). New York: Psychology Press.
Monroe, K. B. (2011). Some personal reflections on pricing research. In N. K. Malhotra (Ed.), Review of marketing research: Special issue – marketing legends (Vol. 8, pp. 209–241). Bingley, United Kingdom: Emerald Group Publishing.
Morwitz, V. G., Greenleaf, E. A., & Johnson, E. J. (1998). Divide and prosper: Consumers' reaction to partitioned prices. Journal of Marketing Research, 35, 453–463.
Pauwels, K., Hanssens, D. M., & Siddarth, S. (2002). The long-term effects of price promotions on category incidence, brand choice, and purchase quantity. Journal of Marketing Research, November, 39, 421–439.
Perry, A. B. (2004). Decreasing math anxiety in students. CollegeStudent Journal, 38, 321–324.
Peters, E. (2008). Numeracy and the perception and communication of risk. Annual NewYork Academy of Sciences, 1128, 1–7.
Richardson, F. C., & Suinn, R. M. (1972). The mathematics anxiety rating scale: Psychometric data. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 19, 551–554.
Richardson, F. C., & Woolfolk, R. L. (1980). Mathematics anxiety. In I. G. Sarason (Ed.), Test anxiety: Theory, research, and application (pp. 271–290). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Smith, C. A., & Kirby, L. D. (2009). Putting appraisal in context: Toward a relational model of appraisal and emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 23(7), 1352–1372.
Suri, R., & Monroe, K. B. (2003). The effects of time constraints on consumers' judgments of prices and products. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 92–104.
Tobias, S. (1987). Math anxiety. Science, 237, 1556.
Wilkinson, G. S. (1993). Wide range achievement test 3. Wilmington, DE: Wide Range, Inc.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Suri, R., Monroe, K.B. & Koc, U. Math anxiety and its effects on consumers’ preference for price promotion formats. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 41, 271–282 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-012-0313-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-012-0313-6