Skip to main content
Log in

A pre-diffusion growth model of intentions and purchase

  • Original Empirical Research
  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate whether information on the history of purchase intentions is useful in predicting actual purchase behavior. The research is motivated by two factors. The first factor is the empirical finding in the literature that measuring intentions just prior to purchase provides better predictions of actual purchase as compared to when these intentions are measured earlier. The second factor is the role of the timing of the formation of intentions prior to purchase. While one stream of literature based on preference fluency predicts that early formation of intentions is more likely to lead to actual purchase, the other stream based on the memory-based “recency” effect predicts that formation of intentions just prior to purchase is more likely to lead to actual purchase. Together, these two factors motivate the potential need to account for the entire history of intentions prior to purchase. A canonical example of a market where intention histories are tracked is the movie industry, where “first choice” movie watching intentions are tracked up to (and in some cases beyond) the time of release. Accommodating the history of intentions in an econometric model that predicts actual box office performance is challenging due to the differing numbers of observations for the movies, the large numbers of observations for certain movies, as well as the role of various time-invariant and time-varying covariates influencing intentions. We propose a two-part model where the first part involves a hierarchical growth model that summarizes the trajectories of intentions via “growth factors.” These growth factors also reflect the role of the various covariates. The second part is a regression of the box office performance on the growth factors and other covariates. The models are simultaneously estimated within a Bayesian framework. Consistent with the previous literature, we find that including information on intentions improves our ability to predict behavior, with the recent intentions being the most informative. Importantly, when the history of intentions is accounted for, our results indicate that the data support the “recency” literature—intentions grow over time leading up to purchase, and this growth has a positive impact on opening box office performance. While a linear growth model performs best for most movies, there exists a subset of movies for which the quadratic growth model better captures the “spike” in intentions just prior to purchase. Further, accounting for information on the history of intentions dramatically improves model fit and forecasting performance relative to when only the intentions at one point in time (e.g., the ones just prior to purchase) are accounted for.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. While not all reported, in our empirical analysis we examined a number of alternative specifications.

  2. In a typical two-step estimation approach where the growth model is estimated first and the box office model subsequently, it will be important to account for the growth factors being estimated and not observed quantities.

References

  • Ainslie, A., Drèze, X., & Zufryden, F. (2005). Modeling movie lifecycles and market share. Marketing Science, 24, 508–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aitkin, M., & Longford, N. (1986). Statistical modeling issues in school effectiveness studies. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 149, 1–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action control: from cognition to behavior (pp. 11–39). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, T. E. (1987). The development of the hierarchy of effects: a historical perspective. In Leigh, J.H., Martin, C. Jr. (eds.), Current issues and research in advertising, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 10, 251–96

  • Basuroy, S., Chatterjee, S., & Ravid, S. A. (2003). How critical are critical reviews? the box office effects of film critics, star power and budgets. Journal of Marketing, 67, 103–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, I. E., & Mitchell, A. A. (1989). The effect of advertising on attitude accessibility, attitude confidence, and the attitude-behavior relationship. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 269–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A., & Curran, P. J. (2006). Latent curve models: a structural equation perspective. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

  • Broemeling, L. D., & Cook, P. (1993). Bayesian estimation of the mean of an autoregressive process. Journal of Applied Statistics, 20, 25–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Congdon, P. (2003). Applied bayesian modelling. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

  • Congdon, P. (2006). Bayesian statistical modelling. 2nd ed., Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

  • Deb, P., Munkin, M. K., & Trivedi, P. K. (2006). Bayesian analysis of the two-part model with endogeneity: application to health care expenditure. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 21, 1081–1099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dellarocas, C., Zhang, X., & Awad, N. F. (2007). Exploring the value of online product reviews in forecasting sales: the case of motion pictures. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21, 23–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhar, R. (1997). Consumer preference for a no-choice option source. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 215–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elberse, A. (2007). The power of stars: do star actors drive the success of movies? Journal of Marketing, 71(4), 101–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elberse, A., & Anand, B. N. (2007). The effectiveness of pre-release advertising for motion pictures: an empirical investigation using a simulated market. Information Economics and Policy, 19(3–4), 319–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elberse, A., & Eliashberg, J. (2003). Demand and supply dynamics for sequentially released products in international markets: the case of motion pictures. Marketing Science, 22, 329–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eliashberg, J., Elberse, A., & Leenders, M. (2006). The motion picture industry: critical issues in practice, current research and new research directions. Marketing Science, 25, 638–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (1995). Bayesian data analysis. New York: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, A., & Meng, X. L. (1996). Model checking and model improvement. In W. Gilks, S. Richardson, & D. Spiegelhalter (Eds.), Practical Markov chain Monte Carlo (pp. 189–201). London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackman, S. (2009). Bayesian analysis for the social sciences. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

  • Kaplan, D. (2000). Structural equation modeling: foundations and extensions. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luan, Y. J., & Sudhir, K. (2010). Forecasting marketing-mix responsiveness for new products. Journal of Marketing Research, 47, 444–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manchanda, P., Rossi, P. E., & Chintagunta, P. K. (2004). Response modeling with nonrandom marketing-mix variables. Journal of Marketing Research, 41, 467–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manski, C. F. (1990). The use of intentions data to predict behavior: a best case analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 934–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marich, R. (2009). Marketing to moviegoers: a handbook of strategies and tactics, Southern Illinois University Press; 2nd edition, page 51.

  • McCulloch, R. E., & Tsay, R. S. (1994). Bayesian analysis of autoregressive time series via the gibbs sampler. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 15, 235–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miniard, P. W., Obermiller, C., & Page, T. J. (1982). Predicting behavior with intentions: a comparison of conditional versus direct measures. In A. Mitchell (Ed.), Advances in consumer research (pp. 461–464). Ann Arbor: Association for Consumer Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miniard, P. W., Obermiller, C., & Page, T. J. (1983). A further assessment of measurement influences on the intention–behavior relationship. Journal of Marketing Research, 20, 206–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, D. G. (1979). Purchase intentions and purchase behavior. Journal of Marketing, 43(2), 65–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morwitz, V. G. (1991). The link between purchase intentions and purchase behavior: predicting across individuals and over time. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.

  • Morwitz, V. G., Steckel, J., & Gupta, A. (2007). When do purchase intentions predict sales? International Journal of Forecasting, 23, 347–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moul, C., & Shugan, S. M. (2005). Theatrical releases and the launching of motion pictures. In A concise handbook of movie industry economics. Cambridge Press

  • Muthén, B. (2000). Methodological issues in random coefficient growth modeling using a latent variable framework: applications to the development of heavy drinking. In J. Rose, L. Chassin, C. Presson, & J. Sherman (Eds.), Multivariate applications in substance use research (pp. 113–140). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B. (2004). Latent variable analysis: growth mixture modeling and related techniques for longitudinal data. In Kaplan, D. (Ed.), Handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

  • Nedungadi, P. (1990). Recall and consumer consideration sets: influencing choice without altering brand evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 263–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neelamegham, R., & Chintagunta, P. K. (1999). A bayesian model to forecast new product performance in domestic and international markets. Marketing Science, 18, 115–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newsweek (2002), The inside track. February 7, 2002 from the Newsweek web archives <http://www.newsweek.com/id/63415/page/1>.

  • Newton, M. A., & Raftery, A. E. (1994). Approximate bayesian inference with the weighted likelihood bootstrap. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 56, 3–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novemsky, N., Dhar, R., Schwarz, N., & Simonson, I. (2007). Preference fluency in choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 44, 347–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ntzoufras, I. (2009). Bayesian modeling using winbugs. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Potthoff, R. F., & Roy, S. N. (1964). A generalized multivariate analysis of variance model useful especially for growth curve problems. Biometrika, 51, 313–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pringle, L. G., Wilson, R. D., & Brody, E. I. (1982). NEWS: a decision oriented model for new product analysis and forecasting. Marketing Science, 1, 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rangan, V. K., & Bell, M. (1994). Nestle refrigerated foods: contadina pasta & pizza (A). HBS No. 595–035, Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing.

  • Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravid, S. A. (1999). Information, blockbusters, and stars - a study of the motion pictures industry. Journal of Business, 72, 463–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray, M. L., Sawyer, A. G., Rothschild, M. L., Heeler, R. M., Strong, E. C., & Reed, J. B. (1973). Marketing communications and the hierarchy-of-effects. In Sage Annual Reviews of Communication Research, Ed. Peter Clarke, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 147–176.

  • Rossi, P. E., Allenby, G., & McCulloch, R. (2005). Bayesian statistics and marketing. John Wiley and Sons.

  • Shugan, S. M., & Swait, J. (2000). Enabling movie design and cumulative box office predictions using historical data and consumer intent-to-view. ARF Conference Proceedings.

  • Spiegelhalter, D. J., Best, N. G., Carlin, B. P., & van der Linde, A. (2002). Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 64, 583–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyson, J. (2000). How movie distribution works. HowStuffWorks.com: <http://entertainment.howstuffworks.com/movie-distribution.htm>

  • Warshaw, P. R. (1980). Predicting purchase and other behaviors from general and contextually specific intentions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 26–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. R., DeSarbo, W. S., & Morwitz, V. G. (1998). The stochastic modeling of purchase intentions and behavior. Management Science, 44, 188–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zellner, A. (1971). An introduction to bayesian inference in econometrics. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zufryden, F. (1996). Linking advertising to box office performance of new film releases - a marketing planning model. Journal of Advertising Research, 36, 29–41.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pradeep K. Chintagunta.

Additional information

The authors thank Elisabeth Honka, Pranav Jindal and Navdeep Sahni for their comments. Chintagunta thanks the Kilts Center for Marketing at the Booth School of Business, University of Chicago for financial support. The usual disclaimer applies.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chintagunta, P.K., Lee, J. A pre-diffusion growth model of intentions and purchase. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 40, 137–154 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0273-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0273-2

Keywords

Navigation