Skip to main content
Log in

Quantification of Antioxidant Ability Against Lipid Peroxidation with an ‘Area Under Curve’ Approach

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society

Abstract

When oxygen is passed through a linoleic acid (LA) emulsion containing copper(II), primary (hydroperoxides) and secondary oxidation products (aldehydes and ketones) are formed, monitored by ferric thiocyanate (Fe(III)-SCN) and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) colorimetry, respectively. As total antioxidant capacity (TAC) against lipid peroxidation was not quantified before, both methods were adapted to an ‘area under curve (AUC)’ approach. LA peroxidation followed pseudo-first order kinetics in aerated emulsions. Absorbance changes as a function of incubation time exhibited sigmoidal curves, enabling the calculation of ‘area under curve’ (AUC) and net AUC = AUCblank−AUCsample, standard calibration curve as net AUC versus concentration, and trolox-equivalent antioxidant capacity of the tested compounds. Garlic extract showed an antioxidative effect on hydroperoxide formation, but a prooxidative effect on TBARS. Although inhibition of lipid peroxidation was described qualitatively before, it was not evaluated quantitatively, e.g., the trolox-equivalent antioxidant capacities (TEAC values) of antioxidants with respect to their inhibitive effect against lipid peroxidation were not calculated and compared. Additionally, real-time monitoring of lipid oxidation products requires highly sophisticated but costly instrumental techniques, but no single oxidation product is a direct measure of lipid oxidation or its antioxidative prevention. The AUC approach is the first quantitative method measuring antioxidant protection against lipid oxidation, with a slightly different order of antioxidative effectiveness from reductive assays because of interfacial effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

LA:

Linoleic acid

Fe(III)-SCN:

Ferric thiocyanate

TBA:

Thiobarbituric acid

TBARS:

Thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances

MDA:

Malondialdehyde

AUC:

Area under curve

TEAC:

Trolox-equivalent antioxidant capacity

k 1 :

Pseudo-first order rate constant with respect to hydroperoxides formation (measured by Fe(III)-SCN method in the presence of antioxidant)

k 1 :

Pseudo-first order rate constant with respect to aldehydes and ketones formation (measured by TBARS method in the presence of antioxidant)

k 0 :

Pseudo-first order rate constant of the control reaction (in the absence of antioxidant)

I,%:

Percentage inhibition

A :

Absorbance, A 500 nm or A 532 nm, proportional to the total concentration of hydroperoxides or secondary products (aldehydes and ketones)

t :

Incubation time

TocH:

Tocopherol

TR:

Trolox

AP:

Ascorbyl palmitate

HQ:

Hydroquinone

TBHQ:

tert-Butyl hydroquinone

TBQ:

tert-Butyl quinone

QR:

Quercetin

MR:

Morin

CT:

Catechin

AA:

Ascorbic acid

FOX:

Ferrous oxidation xylenol orange

PV:

Peroxide value

HAT:

Hydrogen atom transfer

RG:

Raw garlic

ESR:

Electron spin resonance

CIS-MS:

Coordination ion spray-mass spectrometry

ESI-MALDI-TOF:

Electrospray ionization-matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight

TAC:

Total antioxidant capacity

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

References

  1. Rop O, Mlcek J, Jurikova T, Valsikova M, Sochor J, Reznicek V, Kramarova D (2010) Phenolic content, antioxidant capacity, radical oxygen species scavenging and lipid peroxidation inhibiting activities of extracts of five black chokeberry (Aronia melanocarpa (Michx.) Elliot) cultivars. J Med Plants Res 4:2431–2437

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Draper HH, Squires EJ, Mahmoodi H, Wu J, Agarwal S, Hadley M (1993) A comparative-evaluation of thiobarbituric acid methods for the determination of malondialdehyde in biological-materials. Free Radic Biol Med 15:353–363

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mihaljevic B, Katusin-Razem B, Razem D (1996) The reevaluation of the ferric thiocyanate assay for lipid hydroperoxides with special considerations of the mechanistic aspects of the response. Free Radic Biol Med 21:53–63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cramer GL, Miller JF, Pendleton RB, Lands WEM (1991) Iodometric measurement of lipid hydroperoxides in human plasma. Anal Biochem 193:204–211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tres A, Nuchi CD, Bou R, Codony R, Guardiola F (2009) Assessing rabbit and chicken tissue susceptibility to oxidation through the ferrous oxidation-xylenol orange method. Eur J Lipid Technol 111:563–573

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bakır T, Sönmezoğlu İ, İmer F, Apak R (2013) Polar paradox revisited: analogous pairs of hydrophilic and lipophilic antioxidants in linoleic acid emulsion containing Cu(II). J Sci Food Agric 93:2478–2485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fukumoto LR, Mazza G (2000) Assessing antioxidant and prooxidant activities of phenolic compounds. J Agric Food Chem 48:3597–3604

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lea CH (1952) Methods for determining peroxide in lipids. J Sci Food Agric 12(3):586–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Magalhaes LM, Segundo MA, Reis S, Lima JLFC (2008) Methodological aspects about in vitro evaluation of antioxidant properties. Anal Chim Acta 613:1–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ching SY, Hall J, Croft K, Beilby J, Rossi E, Ghisalberti E (2006) Antioxidant inhibition of oxygen radicals for measurement of total antioxidant capacity in biological samples. Anal Biochem 353:257–265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Apak R, Özyürek M, Güçlü K, Çapanoğlu E (2016) Antioxidant activity/capacity measurement. Hydrogen atom transfer (HAT)-based, mixed mode (electron transfer (ET)/(HAT), and lipid peroxidation assays. J Agric Food Chem 64:1028–1045

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Apak R, Gorinstein S, Böhm V, Schaich KM, Özyürek M, Güçlü K (2013) Methods of measurement and evaluation of natural antioxidant capacity/activity (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl Chem 85:957–998

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Huang D, Ou B, Prior RL (2005) The chemistry behind antioxidant capacity assays. J Agric Food Chem 53:1841–1856

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cao G, Prior RL (1998) Comparison of different analytical methods for assessing total antioxidant capacity of human serum. Clin Chem 44:1309–1315

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pedraza-Chaverri J, Gil-Ortiz M, Albarran G, Barbachano-Esparza L, Menjıvar M, Medina-Campos ON (2004) Garlic’s ability to prevent in vitro Cu2+-induced lipoprotein oxidation in human serum is preserved in heated garlic: effect unrelated to Cu2+-chelation. Nutr J 3:10. doi:10.1186/1475-2891-3-10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Torok B, Belagyi J, Rietz B, Jacob R (1994) Effectiveness of garlic on the radical activity in radical generating systems. Arzneimittelforschung 44:608–611

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Pedraza-Chaverri J, Medina-Campos ON, Avila-Lombardo R, Zúñiga-Bustos AB, Orozco-Ibarra M (2006) Reactive oxygen species scavenging capacity of different cooked garlic preparations. Life Sci 78:761–770

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gorinstein S, Drzewiecki J, Leontowicz J, Leontowicz M, Najman K, Jastrzebski Z, Zachwieja Z, Barton H, Shtabsky B, Katrich E, Trakhtenberg S (2005) Comparison of the bioactive compounds and antioxidant potentials of fresh and cooked Polish, Ukrainian, and Israeli garlic. J Agric Food Chem 53:2726–2732

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Yıldoğan-Beker B, Bakır T, Sönmezoğlu I, Imer F, Apak R (2011) Antioxidant protective effect of flavonoids on linoleic acid peroxidation induced by copper(II)/ascorbic acid system. Chem Phys Lipid 164:732–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bakır T, Sönmezoğlu İ, İmer F, Apak R (2014) Antioxidant/prooxidant effects of a-tocopherol, quercetin and isorhamnetin on linoleic acid peroxidation induced by Cu(II) and H2O2. Int J Food Sci Nutr 65:226–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Miller JC, Miller JN (1993) Statistics for analytical chemistry, 3rd edn. Ellis Horwood, Prentice Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pinchuk I, Lichtenberg D (2002) The mechanism of action of antioxidants against lipoprotein peroxidation, evaluation based on kinetic experiments. Prog Lipid Res 41:279–314

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Watanabe Y, Ishido E, Xu Fang Adachi S, Matsuno R (2005) Oxidation kinetics of linoleic acid in the presence of saturated acyl l-ascorbate. J Am Oil Chem Soc 82:389–392

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Koleva II, van Beek TA, Linssen JPH, de Groot A, Evstatieva LN (2002) Screening of plant extracts for antioxidant activity: a comparative study on three testing methods. Phytochem Anal 13:8–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Porter WL (1993) Paradoxical behaviour of antioxidants in food and biological systems. In: By Williams GM (ed) Antioxidants, chemical, physiological, nutritional and toxicological aspects. Princeton Scientific, Princeton, pp 93–121

    Google Scholar 

  26. Brannan RG (2010) Reactive sulfur species act as prooxidants in liposomal and skeletal muscle model systems. J Agric Food Chem 58:3767–3771

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Janero DR (1990) Malondialdehyde and thiobarbituric acid-reactivity as diagnostic indices of lipid peroxidation and peroxidative tissue injury. Free Radic Biol Med 9:515–540

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Rietjens IM, Boersma MG, Haan Ld, Spenkelink B, Awad HM, Cnubben NH, van Zanden JJ, Hv Woude, Alink GM, Koeman JH (2002) The pro-oxidant chemistry of the natural antioxidants vitamin C, vitamin E, carotenoids and flavonoids. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 11:321–333

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Badary OA, Taha RA, Gamal El-Din AM, Abdel-Wahab MH (2003) Thymoquinone is a potent superoxide anion scavenger. Drug Chem Toxicol 26:87–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Li Y, Seacat A, Kuppusamy P, Zweier JL, Yager JD, Trush MA (2002) Copper redox-dependent activation of 2-tert-butyl(1,4)hydroquinone: formation of reactive oxygen species and induction of oxidative DNA damage in isolated DNA and cultured rat hepatocytes. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen 518:123–133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Yildiz Technical University, Research Fund, YTÜ-BAPK Project No: 29-01-02-03. One of the authors (Dr. Apak) would like to thank Istanbul University–Application & Research Center for the Measurement of Food Antioxidants (Istanbul Universitesi Gida Antioksidanlari Olcumu Uygulama ve Arastirma Merkezi) for the development of antioxidant/prooxidant test methods.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reşat Apak.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bakır, T., Sönmezoglu, İ. & Apak, R. Quantification of Antioxidant Ability Against Lipid Peroxidation with an ‘Area Under Curve’ Approach. J Am Oil Chem Soc 94, 77–88 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-016-2918-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-016-2918-2

Keywords

Navigation