Skip to main content
Log in

Priority allocation rules for single machine total weighted linear and square tardiness problems

  • Computer Aided Engineering
  • Published:
Production Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The single machine scheduling problems minimizing total weighted tardiness and square tardiness objectives have been studied in literature for many years. Applications of the model include sequencing problems in manufacture and logistics. This paper proposes two new priority allocation rules, PAR 1 and PAR 2, for solving these two problems. Unlike most known dispatch rules and constructive algorithms, our new rules take advantage of not only the jobs’ static characters values such as the process time, the due date and the weight, but also their dynamic characters values, i.e., the slack and the values of the objective function for different choices of some jobs. At any time when a job is being selected to process, some of the unprocessed jobs are delayed while the others are not. It means that the characters of these two sorts of jobs are different from each other. So, combining these characters with the objective function’s value can obtain effective dispatch rule. Experimental analysis based on the instances from the OR-Library discloses that our priority allocation rules, PAR 1 and PAR 2, are efficient and have significant advantages over traditional approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Smith WE (1956) Various optimizers for single-stage production. Naval Res Logist Q 3:59–66

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Townsend W (1978) The single machine problem with quadratic penalty function of completion times: a branch-and-bound solution. Manag Sci 24(5):530–534

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Mason SJ, Fowler JW, Carlyle WM (2002) A modified shifting bottleneck heuristic for minimizing total weighted tardiness in complex job shops. J Sched 5:247–262

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Lenstra JK, Rinnoy Kan AHG, Brucker P (1977) Complexity of machine scheduling problems. Ann Discret Math 1:343–362

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Potts CN, Van Wassenhove LN (1985) A branch and bound algorithm for total weighted tardiness problem. Oper Res 33:363–377

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Vepsalainen AP, Morton TE (1987) Priority rules for job shops with weighted tardiness costs. Manag Sci 33:1035–1047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kanet JJ, Li X (2004) A weighted modified due date rule for sequencing to minimize weighted tardiness. J Sched 7:261–276

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Valente Jorge MS, Schaller Jeffrey E (2012) Dispatching heuristics for the single machine weighted quadratic tardiness scheduling problem. Comput Oper Res 39:2223–2231

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Schaller Jeffrey E, Valente Jorge MS (2012) Minimizing the weighted sum of squared tardiness on a single machine. Comput Oper Res 39:919–928

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Avci S, Akturk MS, Storer RH (2003) A problem space algorithm for single machine weighted tardiness problems. IIE Trans 35:479–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ergun Ö, Orlin JB (2006) Fast neighborhood search for the single machine total weighted tardiness problem. Oper Res Lett 34:41–45

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Bilge Ü, Kurtulan M, Kıraç F (2007) A tabu search algorithm for the single machine total weighted tardiness problem. Eur J Oper Res 176:1423–1435

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Nearchou AC (2004) Solving the single machine total weighted tardiness scheduling problem using a hybrid simulated annealing algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE international conference on industrial informatics INDIN’04, Berlin, Germany, pp 513–516

  14. Geiger M (2011) New instances for the single machine total weighted tardiness problem. http://edoc.sub.unihmburg.de/hsu/volltexte/2011/2808/pdf/RR-10-03-01.pdf

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 61262011 and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province No. 20142BAB207024.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aihua Yin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yin, A., Punnen, A.P. & Hu, D. Priority allocation rules for single machine total weighted linear and square tardiness problems. Prod. Eng. Res. Devel. 10, 471–476 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-016-0680-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-016-0680-9

Keywords

Navigation