Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ethnographic analysis on the use of the electronic medical record for clinical handoff

  • EM - ORIGINAL
  • Published:
Internal and Emergency Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study was to understand the social elements of clinical and organizational interactions of the key stakeholders in the specific context of an electronic dashboard used by the emergency department (ED) and inpatient medicine teams at the time of clinical referral and handover. An electronic handover function is utilised at the ED-inpatient interface at this institution and has given clinicians the ability to better communicate, monitor the department and strive to improve patient safety in streamline the delivery of care in the acute phase. This study uses an ethnographic qualitative research design incorporating semistructured interviews, participant observation on the ED floor and fieldwork notes. The setting for this research was in the ED at a tertiary University affiliated hospital. Triangulation was used to combine information obtained from multiple sources and information from fieldwork and interviews refined into useable chunks culminating in a thematic analysis. Thematic analysis yielded five central themes that reflected how the clinical staff utilised this IT system and why it had become embedded in the culture of clinical referral and handover. Efficient time management for improved patient flow was demonstrated, value added communication (at the interpersonal level), the building trust at the ED-inpatient interface, the maintenance of mutual respect across medical cultures and an overall enhancement of the quality of ED communication (in terms of the information available). A robust electronic handover process, resulted in an integrated approach to patient care by removing barriers to admission for medical inpatients, admitted via ED. The value proposition for patients was a more complete information transfer, both within the ED and between departments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gonzalo JD, Yang JJ, Stuckey HL, Fischer CM, Sanchez LD, Herzig SJ (2014) Patient care transitions from the emergency department to the medicine ward: evaluation of a standardized electronic signout tool. Int J Qual Health Care 26(4):337–347. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzu040

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Centre BIDMC, Nathanson LA (2013) http://www.bidmc.org/Centers-and-Departments/Departments/Emergency-Medicine/Meet-Our-Team/Academic-Faculty/Larry-A,-d-,-Nathanson.aspx. Accessed 20 Mar 2014

  3. Thorn SA, Carter MA, Bailey JE (2014) Emergency physicians’ perspectives on their use of health information exchange. Ann Emerg Med 63(3):329–337. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.09.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Apker J, Mallak LA, Gibson SC (2007) Communicating in the “gray zone”: perceptions about emergency physician-hospitalist handoffs and patient safety. Acad Emerg Med 14(10):884–894. doi:10.1197/j.aem.2007.06.037

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Laxmisan A, Hakimzada F, Sayan OR, Green RA, Zhang J, Patel VL (2007) The multitasking clinician: decision-making and cognitive demand during and after team handoffs in emergency care. Int J Med Inform 76(11–12):801–811. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.09.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Eisenberg EM, Murphy AG, Sutcliffe K, Wears R, Schenkel S, Perry S, Vanderhoef M (2005) Communication in emergency medicine: implications for patient safety 1. This study was funded by a generous grant from the National Patient Safety Foundation. Commun Monogr 72(4):390–413. doi:10.1080/03637750500322602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kessler CS, Asrow A, Beach C, Cheung D, Fairbanks RJ, Lammers JC, Tibbles C, Wears R, Woods R, Schuur JD (2013) The taxonomy of emergency department consultations–results of an expert consensus panel. Ann Emerg Med 61(2):161–166. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.07.122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nugus P, Forero R (2011) Understanding interdepartmental and organizational work in the emergency department: an ethnographic approach. Int Emerg Nurs 19(2):69–74. doi:10.1016/j.ienj.2010.03.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hilligoss B, Cohen MD (2013) The unappreciated challenges of between-unit handoffs: negotiating and coordinating across boundaries. Ann Emerg Med 61(2):155–160. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.04.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ahmed J, Mehmood S, Rehman S, Ilyas C, Khan LUR (2012) Impact of a structured template and staff training on compliance and quality of clinical handover. Int J Surg 10(9):571–574. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2012.09.001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Balka E, Tolar M, Coates S, Whitehouse S (2013) Socio-technical issues and challenges in implementing safe patient handovers: insights from ethnographic case studies. Int J Med Inform 82(12):e345–e357. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.11.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Horwitz LI, Meredith T, Schuur JD, Shah NR, Kulkarni RG, Jenq GY (2009) Dropping the baton: a qualitative analysis of failures during the transition from emergency department to inpatient care. Ann Emerg Med 53(6):701–710.e704. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.05.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Collins SA, Stein DM, Vawdrey DK, Stetson PD, Bakken S (2014) Content overlap in nurse and physician handoff artifacts and the potential role of electronic health records: a systematic review. J Biomed Inform 44(4):704–712. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2011.01.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Vidyarthi AR, Arora V, Schnipper JL, Wall SD, Wachter RM (2006) Managing discontinuity in academic medical centers: strategies for a safe and effective resident sign-out. J Hosp Med 1(4):257–266. doi:10.1002/jhm.103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Horng S, Pezzella L, Tibbles CD, Wolfe RE, Hurst JM, Nathanson LA (2013) Prospective evaluation of daily performance metrics to reduce emergency department length of stay for surgical consults. J Emerg Med 44(2):519–525. doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.02.058

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Davidson SJ, Zwemer FL Jr, Nathanson LA, Sable KN, Khan AN (2004) Where’s the beef? The promise and the reality of clinical documentation. Acad Emerg Med 11(11):1127–1134. doi:10.1197/j.aem.2004.08.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ursprung R, Gray JE, Edwards WH, Horbar JD, Nickerson J, Plsek P, Shiono PH, Suresh GK, Goldmann DA (2005) Real time patient safety audits: improving safety every day. Qual Saf Health Care 14(4):284–289. doi:10.1136/qshc.2004.012542

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Classen DC, Bates DW (2011) Finding the meaning in meaningful use. N Engl J Med 365(9):855–858. doi:10.1056/NEJMsb1103659

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nugus P, Braithwaite J (2010) The dynamic interaction of quality and efficiency in the emergency department: squaring the circle? Soc Sci Med 70(4):511–517. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.11.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chamberlain K (2000) Methodolatry and qualitative health research. J Health Psychol 5(3):285–296. doi:10.1177/135910530000500306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Liamputtong P (2013) Qualitiative research methods, 4th edn. Oxfor University Press, South Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  22. Institute of Medicine (2001) Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the twenty-first century. National Academies Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  23. Randell R, Wilson S, Woodward P (2011) The importance of the verbal shift handover report: a multi-site case study. Int J Med Informatics 80(11):803–812. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.08.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Horwitz LI, Parwani V, Shah NR, Schuur JD, Meredith T, Jenq GY, Kulkarni RG (2009) Evaluation of an asynchronous physician voicemail sign-out for emergency department admissions. Ann Emerg Med 54(3):368–378. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.01.034

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Wayne JD, Tyagi R, Reinhardt G, Rooney D, Makoul G, Chopra S, DaRosa DA (2008) Simple standardized patient handoff system that increases accuracy and completeness. J Surg Educ 65(6):476–485. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2008.06.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Vawdrey DK, Stein DM, Fred MR, Bostwick SB, Stetson PD (2013) Implementation of a computerized patient handoff application. AMIA Ann Symp Proc 2013:1395–1400

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rao BS, Lowe GO, Hughes AJ (2012) Reduced emergency calls and improved weekend discharge after introduction of a new electronic handover system. Med J Aust 197(10):569–573. doi:10.5694/mja11.11048

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Li P, Ali S, Tang C, Ghali WA, Stelfox HT (2013) Review of computerized physician handoff tools for improving the quality of patient care. J Hosp Med Off Publ Soc Hosp Med 8(8):456–463. doi:10.1002/jhm.1988

    Google Scholar 

  29. Unertl KM, Johnson KB, Lorenzi NM (2012) Health information exchange technology on the front lines of healthcare: workflow factors and patterns of use. J Am Med Inform Assoc 19(3):392–400. doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000432

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hincapie AL, Warholak TL, Murcko AC, Slack M, Malone DC (2011) Physicians’ opinions of a health information exchange. J Am Med Inform Assoc 18(1):60–65. doi:10.1136/jamia.2010.006502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rudin R, Volk L, Simon S, Bates D (2011) What affects clinicians’ usage of health information exchange? Appl Clin Inform 2(3):250–262. doi:10.4338/ACI-2011-03-RA-0021

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Shapiro JS, Kannry J, Lipton M, Goldberg E, Conocenti P, Stuard S, Wyatt BM, Kuperman G (2006) Approaches to patient health information exchange and their impact on emergency medicine. Ann Emerg Med 48(4):426–432. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.03.032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Millard WB (2010) Electronic health records: promises and realities: a 3-part series part I: the digital sea change, ready or not. Ann Emerg Med 56(2):A17–A20. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.06.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Vest JR, Zhao H, Jaspserson J, Gamm LD, Ohsfeldt RL (2011) Factors motivating and affecting health information exchange usage. J Am Med Inform Assoc 18(2):143–149. doi:10.1136/jamia.2010.004812

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Richter JP, McAlearney AS, Pennell ML (2014) The influence of organizational factors on patient safety: examining successful handoffs in health care. Health Care Manage Rev. doi:10.1097/hmr.0000000000000033

    Google Scholar 

  36. Horwitz LI, Moin T, Krumholz HM, Wang L, Bradley EH (2008) Consequences of inadequate sign-out for patient care. Arch Intern Med 168(16):1755–1760. doi:10.1001/archinte.168.16.1755

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Patterson ES, Wears RL (2010) Patient handoffs: standardized and reliable measurement tools remain elusive. Joint Comm Res 36(2):52–61

    Google Scholar 

  38. Abraham J, Kannampallil T, Patel VL (2014) A systematic review of the literature on the evaluation of handoff tools: implications for research and practice. J Am Med Inform Assoc 21(1):154–162. doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Fernandopulle R, Ferris T, Epstein A, McNeil B, Newhouse J, Pisano G, Blumenthal D (2003) A research agenda for bridging the ‘quality chasm’. Health Aff (Millwood) 22(2):178–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The staff of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Emergency department and the Australian-American Fulbright Commission.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Medical Services, Logan Hospital, Brisbane, Australia

    Philippa Nelson

  2. RBWH Department of Emergency Medicine, Butterfield St, Herston, QLD, 4006, Australia

    Anthony J. Bell

  3. Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, USA

    Larry Nathanson, Leon D. Sanchez, Jonathan Fisher & Philip D. Anderson

Authors
  1. Philippa Nelson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anthony J. Bell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Larry Nathanson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Leon D. Sanchez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jonathan Fisher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Philip D. Anderson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthony J. Bell.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Statement of human and animal rights

Compliance with ethical standards was adhered to through Institutional Review Board approval.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained for clinical staff and other key stakeholders.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nelson, P., Bell, A.J., Nathanson, L. et al. Ethnographic analysis on the use of the electronic medical record for clinical handoff. Intern Emerg Med 12, 1265–1272 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-016-1567-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-016-1567-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation