Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Emergency testing for antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies combined with a dialog-based policy between clinician and biologist: effectiveness for the diagnosis of ANCA-associated vasculitis

  • IM - ORIGINAL
  • Published:
Internal and Emergency Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A prompt immunosuppressive treatment initiation is crucial in ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) to minimize organ injury. The aim of the present work was to analyze the accuracy of emergency ANCA screening to identify rapidly patients with AAV. In our Institution, emergency ANCA screening is based on a telephone call between a Clinician and a Biologist. Indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) for ANCA detection was performed using a commercial kit (Euroimmun® Granulocyte Mosaic 12). Positive serums for c- or p-ANCA at IIF are subsequently screened for antigenic specificity (MPO or PR3) by an immunodot technique (immunodot, D-Tek®.) Positive samples with atypical c- or p-ANCA pattern at IIF are subsequently screened for antigenic specificity by ELISA. Data were retrieved from patients’ medical records and confronted to emergency ANCA screening results. Between 2005 and 2012, 114 patients were screened. IIF was positive in 27.2 % of patients, but c-/p-ANCA anti-MPO/-PR3 was detected in 13.2 % of patients. The sensibility and specificity of IIF combined with immunodot for newly diagnosed AAV were 83.3 and 100 %, respectively. Ten patients were newly diagnosed with AAV. In these patients, a specific AAV treatment was initiated less than 24 h following ANCA screening. Emergency ANCA screening based on a clinical gating policy was relevant to identify patients with AAV diagnosis, and was associated with a rapid treatment initiation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beauvillain C, Delneste Y, Renier G, Jeannin P, Subra JF, Chevailler A (2008) Antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies: how should the biologist manage them? Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 35(1–2):47–58. doi:10.1007/s12016-007-8071-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jennette JC, Falk RJ, Hu P, Xiao H (2013) Pathogenesis of antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody-associated small-vessel vasculitis. Annu Rev Pathol 8:139–160. doi:10.1146/annurev-pathol-011811-132453

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tervaert JW, van der Woude FJ, Fauci AS, Ambrus JL, Velosa J, Keane WF, Meijer S, van der Giessen M, van der Hem GK, The TH et al (1989) Association between active Wegener’s granulomatosis and anticytoplasmic antibodies. Arch Intern Med 149(11):2461–2465

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Subra JF, Michelet C, Laporte J, Carrere F, Reboul P, Cartier F, Saint-Andre JP, Chevailler A (1998) The presence of cytoplasmic antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (C-ANCA) in the course of subacute bacterial endocarditis with glomerular involvement, coincidence or association? Clin Nephrol 49(1):15–18

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tur BS, Suldur N, Ataman S, Tutkak H, Atay MB, Duzgun N (2004) Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: clinical, biological, and radiological correlations. Jt Bone Spine : revue du rhumatisme 71(3):198–202. doi:10.1016/j.jbspin.2003.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Aslam A, Newman TL, Misbah SA (2003) Audit of the clinical usefulness of a rapid qualitative ELISA screen for antimyeloperoxidase and antiproteinase 3 antibodies in the assessment of patients with suspected vasculitis. J Clin Pathol 56(10):775–777

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Savige J, Gillis D, Benson E, Davies D, Esnault V, Falk RJ, Hagen EC, Jayne D, Jennette JC, Paspaliaris B, Pollock W, Pusey C, Savage CO, Silvestrini R, van der Woude F, Wieslander J, Wiik A (1999) International consensus statement on testing and reporting of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA). Am J Clin Pathol 111(4):507–513

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Savige J, Dimech W, Fritzler M, Goeken J, Hagen EC, Jennette JC, McEvoy R, Pusey C, Pollock W, Trevisin M, Wiik A, Wong R, International Group for Consensus Statement on T, Reporting of Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic A (2003) Addendum to the international consensus statement on testing and reporting of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies. Quality control guidelines, comments, and recommendations for testing in other autoimmune diseases. Am J Clin Pathol 120(3):312–318. doi:10.1309/WAEP-ADW0-K4LP-UHFN

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Arnold DF, Timms A, Luqmani R, Misbah SA (2010) Does a gating policy for ANCA overlook patients with ANCA associated vasculitis? An audit of 263 patients. J Clin Pathol 63(8):678–680. doi:10.1136/jcp.2009.072504

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mandl LA, Solomon DH, Smith EL, Lew RA, Katz JN, Shmerling RH (2002) Using antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody testing to diagnose vasculitis: can test-ordering guidelines improve diagnostic accuracy? Arch Intern Med 162(13):1509–1514

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sinclair D, Saas M, Stevens JM (2004) The effect of a symptom related “gating policy” on ANCA requests in routine clinical practice. J Clin Pathol 57(2):131–134

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Robinson PC, Steele RH (2009) Appropriateness of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody testing in a tertiary hospital. J Clin Pathol 62(8):743–745. doi:10.1136/jcp.2009.064485

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Russell KA, Wiegert E, Schroeder DR, Homburger HA, Specks U (2002) Detection of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies under actual clinical testing conditions. Clin Immunol 103(2):196–203. doi:10.1006/clim.2001.5200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tsiveriotis K, Tsirogianni A, Pipi E, Soufleros K, Papasteriades C (2011) Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies testing in a large cohort of unselected greek patients. Autoimmun Dis 2011:626495. doi:10.4061/2011/626495

    Google Scholar 

  15. Moroni G, Ponticelli C (2014) Rapidly progressive crescentic glomerulonephritis: early treatment is a must. Autoimmun Rev 13(7):723–729. doi:10.1016/j.autrev.2014.02.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Catanoso M, Pipitone N, Magnani L, Boiardi L, Salvarani C (2011) New indications for biological therapies. Intern Emerg Med 6(Suppl 1):1–9. doi:10.1007/s11739-011-0667-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-François Augusto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sayegh, J., Poli, C., Chevailler, A. et al. Emergency testing for antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies combined with a dialog-based policy between clinician and biologist: effectiveness for the diagnosis of ANCA-associated vasculitis. Intern Emerg Med 10, 315–319 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-014-1141-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-014-1141-0

Keywords

Navigation