Abstract
Why should interpretation of conceptual schemes and practices (forms of life) across traditions work at all? In this paper we present the following necessary conditions of possibility for interpretation in comparative and Chinese philosophy: the interpreter must presuppose that there are mutually recognizable human practices; the interpreter must presuppose that “the other” is, on the whole, sincere, consistent, and right; the interpreter must be committed to certain epistemic virtues. Some of these necessary conditions are consistent with the fact that interpretation is not thwarted by the “danger” of relativism or of incommensurability. Some other conditions are suggestive of reorientations of methodologies of comparative and Chinese philosophy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ames, Roger T., and Henry Rosemont. 1998. The Analects of Confucius: A Philosophical Translation. New York: Random House.
Bataille, Georges. 2005. The Cradle of Humanity: Prehistoric Art and Culture. New York: Zone Books.
Cavell, Stanley. 1979. The Claim of Reason: Wittgenstein, Skepticism, Morality and Tragedy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cua, Antonio S., ed. 2003. Encyclopedia of Chinese Philosophy. New York and London: Routledge.
Davidson, Donald. 2001. Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
____. 2004. Problems of Rationality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Fingarette, Herbert. 1991. “Reason, Spontaneity, and the Li 禮—A Confucian Critique of Graham’s Solution to the Problem of Fact and Value.” In Chinese Texts and Philosophical Contexts. Essays Dedicated to Angus C. Graham, edited by Henry Rosemont. Chicago and La Salle: Open Court.
Fraser, Chris. 2014. “Wandering the Way: A Eudaimonistic Approach to the Zhuāngzǐ.” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 13.4: 541–565.
Gibson, James. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Goodman, Nelson. 1972. Problems and Projects. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
Graham, Angus C. 1981. Chuang-Tzu. The Inner Chapters. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
____. 1992. “Conceptual Schemes and Linguistic Relativism in Relation to Chinese.” In Unreason within Reason: Essays of the Outskirts of Rationality, edited by Angus C. Graham. La Salle: Open Court.
Grandy, R. E. 1973. “Reference, Meaning, and Belief.” The Journal of Philosophy 70: 439–452.
Hall, David L., and Roger T. Ames. 1995. Anticipating China: Thinking through the Narratives of Chinese and Western Culture. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Hansen, Chad. 1983. “Preface: [the section] The Coherent Theory Methodology of Interpretation.” In Language and Logic in Ancient China. http://www.philosophy.hku.hk/ch/L&L1.htm (last access August 1, 2016).
____. 1992. A Daoist Theory of Chinese Thought: A Philosophical Interpretation. New York: Oxford University Press.
____. 2007. “Prolegomena to Future Solutions to ‘White-Horse Not Horse’.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 34: 473–491.
____. 2014. “Principle of Humanity vs. Principle of Charity.” In Moral Relativism and Chinese Philosophy: David Wong and His Critics, edited by Xiao Yang and Huang Yong. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Huang, Yong, and Xiao Yang. 2014. “Introduction.” In Moral Relativism and Chinese Philosophy: David Wong and His Critics, edited by Xiao Yang and Huang Yong. Albany: State University of New York Press.
LePore, Ernest, and Kirk Ludwig. 2005. Donald Davidson: Meaning, Truth, Language, and Reality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Li, Chenyang. 2007. “Li as Cultural Grammar: On the Relation between Li and Ren in Confucius’ Analects.” Philosophy East and West 57.3: 311–329.
Ma, Lin. 2008. Heidegger on East-West Dialogue: Anticipating the Event. New York: Routledge.
____. 2014. “A Zhuangzian Response to Heidegger’s Mitsein.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 41.3/4: 487–502.
____. 2015. “Thinking with Zhuangzi and Su Shi against Heidegger on Artwork.” Philosophy East and West 65.3: 809–845.
Ma, Lin, and Jaap van Brakel. 2013. “On the Conditions of Possibility for Comparative and Intercultural Philosophy.” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 12.3: 297–312.
____. 2016. Fundamentals of Comparative and Intercultural Philosophy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
McLeod, Alexus. 2015. “Replies to Brons and Mou on Wang Chong and Pluralism.” Comparative Philosophy 6.1: 169–184.
Rudebusch, George. 2014. “Reconsidering Ren as Virtue and Benevolence.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 40.3/4: 456–472.
Saunders Jr., Frank. 2014. “Semantics without Truth in Later Mohist Philosophy of Language.” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 13.2: 215–229.
Schulte, Joachim. 2010. “Does the Devil in Hell Have a Form of Life?” In Wittgenstein on Forms of Life and the Nature of Experience, edited by Antonio Marques and Nuno Venturinha. Bern: Peter Lang.
Smith, Huston. 1980. “Western and Comparative Perspectives on Truth.” Philosophy East and West 30.4: 425–437.
van Brakel, Jaap. 2014. “Heidegger on Zhuangzi and Uselessness.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 41.3/4: 387–406.
van Brakel, Jaap, and Ma Lin. 2015. “Extension of Family Resemblance Concepts as a Necessary Condition of Interpretation across Traditions.” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 14.4: 475–497.
van Fraassen, Bas. 1989. Laws and Symmetry. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
von Savigny, Eike. 1991. “Common Behaviour of Many a Kind: Philosophical Investigations Section 206.” In Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations: Text and Context, edited by Robert L. Arrington and Hans-Johann Glock. London: Routledge.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1969. The Blue and Brown Books: Preliminary Studies for the Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.
____. 1974. Philosophical Grammar, edited by Rush Rhees. Oxford: Blackwell.
____. 1975. On Certainty, edited by G. E. M. Anscombe and G. H. von Wright. Oxford: Blackwell.
____. 1978. Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics, edited by G. H. von Wright, Rush Rhees, and G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell.
____. 1993. “Remarks on Frazer’s Golden Bough.” In Philosophical Occasions 1912–1951, edited by James C. Klagge and Alfred Nordmann. Indianapolis: Hackett.
____. 2000. Wittgenstein’s Nachlass: Text and Facsimile Version. The Bergen Electronic Edition. Bergen and Oxford: Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen and Oxford University Press.
____. 2009a. Philosophical Investigations. 4th ed. Trans. by G. E. M. Anscombe, P. M. S. Hacker and Joachim Schulte, and revised by P. M. S. Hacker and Joachim Schulte. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
____. 2009b. Philosophy of Psychology—a Fragment. 4th ed. Trans. by G. E. M. Anscombe, P. M. S. Hacker, and Joachim Schulte, and revised by P. M. S. Hacker and Joachim Schulte.. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Wong, David. 2006. Natural Moralities: A Defense of Pluralistic Relativism. New York: Oxford University Press.
____. 2014. “Reply to Hansen.” In Moral Relativism and Chinese Philosophy: David Wong and His Critics, edited by Xiao Yang and Huang Yong Huang. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ma, L., van Brakel, J. A Theory of Interpretation for Comparative and Chinese Philosophy. Dao 15, 575–589 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-016-9522-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-016-9522-x