Skip to main content
Log in

Eudaimonism in the Mencius: Fulfilling the Heart

  • Published:
Dao Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper argues that Mencius is a eudaimonist, and that his eudaimonism plays an architectonic role in his thought. Mencius maintains that the most satisfying life for a human being is the life of benevolence, rightness, wisdom, and ritual propriety, and that such a life fulfills essential desires and capacities of the human heart. He also repeatedly appeals both to these and to morally neutral desires in his efforts to persuade others to develop and exercise the virtues. Classical Greek eudaimonists similarly regarded the life of virtue as both objectively good and subjectively desirable, and appealed to the desire for eudaimonia or happiness to motivate a commitment to the virtues. Mencius offers a carefully crafted, teleological account of human nature that appears designed in part to support his eudaimonism. In contrast with proposals by other scholars, I argue that Mencius’ notion of happiness, analogous to the Greek eudaimonia, is expressed by the construction jìn xìng 盡性, “fulfilling human nature” or the nearly equivalent jìn xīn 盡心, “fulfilling one’s heart.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Annas, Julia. 1993. The Morality of Happiness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ______. 1998. “Virtue and Eudaimonism.” Social Philosophy and Policy 15: 37–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. 1999. Nicomachean Ethics. Trans. by T. Irwin. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Joseph. 2013. Confucian Perfectionism: A Political Philosophy for Modern Times. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Foot, Philippa. 2001. Natural Goodness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, A. C. 1989. Disputers of the Dao: Philosophical Argument in Ancient China. Peru, IL: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • ______. 1990. “The Background of Mencius’ Theory of Human Nature.” In Studies in Chinese Philosophy and Philosophical Literature. Albany: SUNY Press.

  • Huang, Yong. 2010. “Confucius and Mencius on the Motivation to be Moral.” Philosophy East and West 60.1: 65–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huff, Benjamin. 2013. “The Target of Life in Aristotle and Wang Yangming.” In Virtue Ethics and Confucianism, edited by Stephen Angle and Michael Slote. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hursthouse, Rosalind. 1999. On Virtue Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanhoe, Philip J. 2002. Ethics in the Confucian Tradition. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • ______. 2007. “Heaven as a Source for Ethical Warrant in Early Confucianism.” Dao 6.3: 211–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ______. 2010. “The Values of Spontaneity.” In Taking Confucian Ethics Seriously, edited by Yu Kam-por, Julia Tao, and Philip J. Ivanhoe. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ______. 2013a. “Happiness in Early Chinese Thought.” In Oxford Handbook of Happiness, edited by Susan A. David, Ilona Boniwell, and Amanda Conley Ayers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ______. 2013b. “Virtue Ethics and the Chinese Confucian Tradition.” In Cambridge Companion to Virtue Ethics, edited by Daniel C. Russell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. 1981. Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. James W. Ellington. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.

  • Kraut, Richard. 2007. What is Good and Why. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lau, D. C. 2000. “Theories of Human Nature in Mencius and Xunzi.” In Virtue, Nature, and Moral Agency in the Xunzi, edited by T. C. Kline and P. J. Ivanhoe. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.

  • ______, trans. 2003. Mencius. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.

  • Leys, Simon, trans. 1997. The Analects of Confucius. New York: W. W. Norton.

  • MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1984. After Virtue. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ______. 1999. Dependent Rational Animals. Peru, IL: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, John. 1980. “The Role of Eudaimonia in Aristotle’s Ethics.” In Essays on Aristotle’s Ethics, edited by Amélie Oksenberg Rorty. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, John Stuart. 2002. Utilitarianism. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, David K. 2010. “Xenophon and the Enviable Life of Socrates.” In The Cambridge Companion to Socrates, edited by Donald R. Morrison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato. 1987. Gorgias. Trans. by David J. Zeyl. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • ______. 1989. Symposium. Trans. by Alexander Nehemas and Paul Woodruff. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ______. 1993. Euthydemus. Trans. by Rosamond Kent Sprague. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Daniel C. 2013. “Virtue Ethics, Happiness, and the Good Life.” In Cambridge Companion to Virtue Ethics, edited by Daniel C. Russell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sim, May. 2007. Remastering Morals with Aristotle and Confucius. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Slingerland, Edward, trans. 2003. Analects. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.

  • Slote, Michael. 2009. “Comments on Bryan Van Norden’s Virtue Ethics and Consequentialism in Early Chinese Philosophy.” Dao 8.3: 289–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ______. 2011. The Impossibility of Perfection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker, Aaron. 2006. Overcoming Our Evil. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanton, Christine. 2005. Virtue Ethics: A Pluralistic View. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Norden, Bryan. 2007. Virtue Ethics and Consequentialism in Early Chinese Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ______, trans. 2008. Mengzi, With Selections from Traditional Commentaries. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.

  • ______. 2009. “Response to Angle and Slote.” Dao 8.3: 305–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ______. 2013. “Toward a Synthesis of Confucianism and Aristotelianism.” In Virtue Ethics and Confucianism, edited by Stephen C. Angle and Michael Slote. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waley, Arthur. 1939. Three Ways of Thought in Ancient China. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Matthew. 2013. “Structured Inclusivism about Human Flourishing: A Mengzian Formulation.” In Virtue Ethics and Confucianism, edited by Stephen C. Angle and Michael Slote. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, Burton, trans. 2003. Xunzi: Basic Writings. New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Yearley, Lee. 1990. Mencius and Aquinas: Theories of Virtue and Conceptions of Courage. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Jiyuan. 2007. The Ethics of Confucius and Aristotle: Mirrors of Virtue. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin I. Huff.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huff, B.I. Eudaimonism in the Mencius: Fulfilling the Heart. Dao 14, 403–431 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-015-9444-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-015-9444-z

Keywords

Navigation